similar to: Notch Filter in AEC

Hi Jean-Marc, You make that sound like its just a matter of meeting some arbitrary spec. Let's be more specific..... If you use narrow band voice down to deep bass frequencies: - 16 bit linear audio sounds good - alaw or ulaw sounds muddy - low bit rate codecs, like speex or G.729, sound awful. I assume QinBin only listened to some uncompressed audio in his evaluation.

Hi, But in fact, it really affects the voice quality. One of my tester says, "Is your mouth far way from the mic?" Could you explain why we should cut 200hz below? >The notch filter is specifically designed to cut below 200 Hz when >working in narrowband. In wideband, the cutoff is more around 50 Hz. The >reason is that in narrowband operation (irrespective of the

The notch filter is specifically designed to cut below 200 Hz when working in narrowband. In wideband, the cutoff is more around 50 Hz. The reason is that in narrowband operation (irrespective of the codec), you're not really supposed to have anything below ~200 Hz, but a lot of people forget that. Jean-Marc On 2010-03-03 02:40, brant wrote: > Hi, > > The notch filter in

On 03/03/2010 10:22 PM, QianBin wrote: > Hi, > > But in fact, it really affects the voice quality. One of my tester says, "Is your mouth far way from the mic?" > Could you explain why we should cut 200hz below? > We already said it affects the quality when the voice is compressed. Are you asking why that should be? Even with a simple form of lightly lossy

A function I've been using for a while returned a surprising [to me, given the data] error recently: Error in plot.window(xlim, ylim, log, asp, ...) : Logarithmic axis must have positive limits After some digging I realized what was going on: x <- c(10460.97, 10808.67, 29499.98, 1, 35818.62, 48535.59, 1, 1, 42512.1, 1627.39, 1, 7571.06, 21479.69, 25, 1, 16143.85, 12736.96,

Dear community I tried the following code using geom_boxplot() and notch=TRUE. Does anyone know if the command ?notch=TRUE? is at the wrong place in my special code construct? Without notch=TRUE the code provides the planned ggplot. Kind regards Sibylle Code: MS1<- MS %>% filter(QI_A!="NA") %>% droplevels() MS1$Jahr<-as.factor(MS1$Jahr) MS1s <-

I don't see anything obviously wrong here. There may be something subtle, but we probably won't be able to help without a reproducible example ... On 2024-08-16 9:24 a.m., SIBYLLE ST?CKLI via R-help wrote: > Dear community > > > > I tried the following code using geom_boxplot() and notch=TRUE. Does anyone > know if the command ?notch=TRUE? is at the wrong place in

Is there a way to modify the choice of notch size [1] in R's boxplot routine from outlining a 5% significance region, to say 1% or lower? Thanks, Alex [1] McGill, Tukey, and Larsen. "Variations of Box Plots", The American Statistician, Vol. 32, No. 1, 12-16.

Thanks Ben, Here the reproducible example. It works without notch=TRUE, but provides an error with notch=TURE Error in `geom_boxplot()`: ! Problem while converting geom to grob. ? Error occurred in the 1st layer. Caused by error in `ans[ypos] <- rep(yes, length.out = len)[ypos]`: ! replacement has length zero Run `rlang::last_trace()` to see where the error occurred. Warning message: In

That's not really a reprex Sibylle.? I did try to use it to see if I could work out what you were trying to do and help but there is so much in there that I suspect is distraction from the notch issue and its error message. Please can you give us something stripped of all unecessary things and tell us what you want? Something like data that we can read as a tribble() or from a dput() of

PR #7690 points out that if the confidence intervals (+/-1.58 IQR/sqrt(n)) in a boxplot with notch=TRUE are larger than the hinges -- which is most likely to happen for small n and asymmetric distributions -- the resulting plot is ugly, e.g.: set.seed(1001) npts <- 5 X <- rnorm(2*npts,rep(3:4,each=npts),sd=1) f <- factor(rep(1:2,each=npts)) boxplot(X~f) boxplot(X~f,notch=TRUE) I can

Hello. I have the following situation. AEC is used in network chat software over DirectSound API. Echo and reference signals are almost aligned (delay is no more than 30ms). When echo is emulated in notebook (built-in speakers + mic) everything goes fine and echo is cancelled. But when configuration includes stand-alone speakers and mic no echo is removed. Audio is in 22050 hz at 16 bit

Hello, I'm using the code below to generate some notched box plots. The issue is whenever I use log scale, the sides of the bottom part of the box plots don't plot. I've tried it in RStudio Ver 1.1.419 and R version 3.4.3 and I get the same result. The code and link to my data is below. Thank you for your time David MyData <-

Hi I am using speex 1.2-beta-3. I got AEC working on windows CE platform by synchronizing MIC and speaker frames. The AEC is working perfectly fine for default volume but fails miserably for max volume level. Are there any more changes i need to do if we increase volume of device? -- SHAHEER AHMED - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi I'm getting a weird result when I try to switch from a normal box plot to a notched one. The ends of the box fold down toward the median giving a horned appearance. Is just the sample itself? It is small, but the un-notched plot looks okay. Anyway to fix this? e7=as.vector(c(234,37,98,116,47)) boxplot(e7, plot=TRUE, notch=TRUE) Thanks very much.

The problem with different sound cards is that their clocks are not usually synchronized, and therefore the clock drift adds a non-linear factor to the audio path. The AEC can only cancel linear changes to the audio path, and so the AEC never converges.One solution is to measure the clock drift and resample either the input or output signal so that they *are* synchronized, and then the AEC

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20090811/ad615b2a/attachment.htm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: comunip.gif Type: image/gif Size: 1663 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20090811/ad615b2a/attachment.gif

Hi,all I have tested AEC on files, it works well.I have some files,one is echo file, others are echo-added files(an origin file adding echo at different delay,such as 20ms,40ms...120ms,140ms).AEC do wonderfully on those files except echo added at 140ms-delay. But ,when i use AEC in my voip project, it does feebly. Who can give me some hints why caused this.How long can sound be picked up by

Hi, I am looking for AEC software which can be run on the server side. This means there will be a fairly constant 600ms or so gap between sending out an audio frame and getting it back with echo. Could Speex AEC be configured to handle these conditions? If so, how good can I expect it to be? Thanks --------------------------------- Yahoo! Mail is the world's

Hi, I couldn't find a discussion that specifically addresses this, so here it is. I'm using Speex AEC in my mobile VoIP application to cancel speaker echo. The used version is 1.2rc1 from the website, and I'm compiling with fixed-point. On most occasions, the AEC works very well and cancels most of the echo (combined with the preprocessor). On some devices, where the microphone signal