similar to: Packing multiple frames in a RTP packet

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "Packing multiple frames in a RTP packet"

2009 Dec 10
1
Packing multiple frames in a RTP packet
Hello Jean-Marc We really appreciate your input. If I understand it right, we should be calling the encoder on the same SpeexBits structure passing it a frame at a time to encode for as many times as the number of frames that we want to pack in the RTP payload. The output then obtained from from the encoder will have the necessary padding at the end without any separators between individual
2009 Dec 10
0
Packing multiple frames in a RTP packet
You cannot concatenate bytes because Speex frames don't necessarily end on octet boundaries. You need to call the encoder multiple times on the same SpeexBits bitpacket. Jean-Marc Manish Jalan wrote: > Hello, > > _*Background:*_ > The RFC 5574 suggests the RTP payload format for the speex codec. The > payload formation is straight forward; the encoded frames are to be >
2007 Sep 17
5
rtp payload lenth
Hello to all speex developers, I have question regarding payload length of narrowband speex in RTP. I were watching tcpdump of the xlite softphone and have found that it uses weird payload length namely 75 Bytes I went through various source and without success. To be clear: For 8000Hz sample in 20 ms that is 160 samples per frame. This makes 50 frames per sec. modes bit-rate 8 kbit/s
2008 Feb 25
1
eos on continued page
On 26/02/2008, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hmm, good point. Maybe it requires a MUST specification... But then, it > would not be conformant to have a partial packet on the last page.... I'd definitely prefer that the recommendation to not have an incomplete packet on a page marked eos is a SHOULD not a MUST, so that eos pages don't need to be
2009 Nov 25
1
SpeexBits ...
Hi Marian, I took a brief look at RFC 5574 and as far as I understand, you can simply do it like this: SpeexBits b; speex_encode(state, some320bytePCM1, &b); speex_encode(state, some320bytePCM2, &b); After that, get the encoded data with speex_bits_write and put it in your packet. Mark -----Original Message----- From: speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev-bounces at
2005 Oct 17
2
OCFS for RHAS4 download
Greetings, I read from archive that OCFS is for kernel 2.6. which means RHAS4.0 is supported. However, I can't find the download for this version. Is the support official and where can I download it. Thanks / regards, Ivan Wong Database Administrator e2Open Inc. (www.e2open.com) Suite 34.03, Level 34, Menara Citibank, 156, Jalan Ampang, 50450 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia DID: +603 2776 6397
2018 Nov 15
4
How to concatenate Ogg in the browser JS?
Thank you, ogginfo returned: ----- Note: Stream 1 has serial number 0, which is legal but may cause problems with some tools. New logical stream (#1, serial: 00000000): type vorbis Vorbis headers parsed for stream 1, information follows... Version: 0 Vendor: ffmpeg Channels: 1 Rate: 22050 Nominal bitrate: 35.333000 kb/s Upper bitrate not set Lower bitrate not set Vorbis stream 1: Total data
2009 Nov 23
2
RFC 5574 and multiple frames
Hello all, I am experimenting with Speex in a mobile VoIP application, and it seems that it is worth stuffing more than one codec frame into a single RTP packet; mainly, that sending several frames per packet relieves the underlying network socket connection, which is notoriously problematic in mobile devices. RFC 5574 defines the exact way how to put multiple Speex frames into a single RTP
2005 Feb 18
1
Asterisk Performance in comparission of SER
How much can be the load (How much register and calls Asterisk can Handle simultaneously by asterisk) and what will be the performance of Asterisk (Call Quality) if all the users are on SIP only and uses same Codec, I have all three codecs loaded G.711, G.723, G.729) without media support i.e. ("canreinvite=yes"), Thanks & Regards Ritesh Jalan -------------- next part
2011 Jul 26
3
More frames in one packet
After searching the mailing list archive (I forgot to do that before posting, sorry!) I found the solutions: 1) The documentation has a mistake: The bit terminator is NOT set automatically! (I'm using the latest speex version!) It has to be set manually using speex_bits_insert_terminator(&bits); 2) speex_decoder_int() has to be called as long, as it returns -1. After that, all frames
2012 Feb 06
2
creating more vectors out of one
Dear R-helpers, I have got a vector which looks like the following: apkz <- c(1,2,3,4,5,6,1,1,2,1,2,3,4) now I am trying to find a way to automatically create several vectors, each starting with the number 1, namely: First vector 1 2 3 4 5 6 Second vector 1 Thrid vector 1 2 Fourth vector 1 2 3 4 Does anyone know how to do that? Thank you very much for your help in advance!
2008 Feb 25
2
eos on continued page
>> There general idea with Ogg has been to distinguish non-fatal from >> fatal errors. libogg reports these by returning -1 while still >> returning the next valid bit of data. > > ok, would non-fatal translate into a SHOULD recommendation in the > spec, and fatal translate into a MUST? I assume there there are cases where a MUST isn't respected, yet libogg is
2008 Dec 05
9
Bar Chart in Rails
Hi Everyone, Can anyone tell me how to draw a bar chart in Rails? Is there any in-built method in Ruby on Rails (or) should i go for 3rd party plugins? I searched and came across this "open flash chart" - i don''t know how to customize it according to my requirement. PS: I have attached my requirement sample for you reference. Thanks, Vasanth Attachments:
2010 Sep 22
1
Bundler picking up wrong version of Ruby with Rails 3 ( possible bundler bug )
Hello All, I am developing a JRuby on Rails 3 application. Standard stuff. I am facing problems getting autotest to run. Here''s the trace: % autotest loading autotest/rails_rspec2 bundle exec /Users/manish/Foo/Foo-Server/jruby-1.5.2/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-core-2.0.0.beta.22/bin/rspec
2005 Dec 16
3
Server crashed with Common/ocfsgencreate.c, Common/ocfsgenvote.c
Hi Experts, We have a 4nodes RAC running and recently one is down due to hardware (fibre optics card) failure. Since running on 3-nodes RAC, the surviving server just keep crashing. We cannot figure out why is this happening but checking /var/log/messages we have these error (notice the msg before crashing at 8:32): Dec 12 08:30:45 x335-142 kernel: (2) ERROR: file entry name did not match inode,
2011 May 03
3
[LLVMdev] Loop-Unroll optimization
Hi, You might want to try running -loops -loop-simplify before loop unroll. >From loop simplify.cpp This pass performs several transformations to transform natural loops into a00011 // simpler form, which makes subsequent analyses and transformations simpler and00012 // more effective. Arushi On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Manish Gupta <mgupta.iitr at gmail.com> wrote: > You
2005 Jun 23
1
smbclient fails to list directory >36 entries
Hi all, I have a problem with smbclient from the samba-client-3.0.14a-2 package supplied with Fedora Core 2. It hangs when listing any directory with over 36 items in it on one particular Windows XP Professional box I'm trying to back up. If I run smbclient -d 3, I get the following output over and over when listing the directory: received 36 entries (eos=0) received 36 entries (eos=0)
2011 May 03
0
[LLVMdev] Loop-Unroll optimization
Even after all the sequence of commands below bit-code is not showing any effect of loop-unrolling *manish at manish:~/Test2$ llvm-gcc-4.2 -O2 -emit-llvm Hello.c -c -o Hello.bc* *manish at manish:~/Test2$ opt-2.8 -loops Hello.bc -o Hello1.bc* *manish at manish:~/Test2$ opt-2.8 -loopsimplify Hello1.bc -o Hello2.bc* *manish at manish:~/Test2$ opt-2.8 -indvars Hello2.bc -o Hello3.bc* *manish at
2011 May 04
1
[LLVMdev] Loop-Unroll optimization
1. You should run the passes in the same opt command, for passes like loops which is an analysis pass provides results to the following passes. 2. You can pass a -debug flag to opt to see the some debugging info. 3. I tried this opt -mem2reg -loops -loopsimplify -loop-unroll -unroll-count=3 -debug loop.o -o tt.bc and got this message. Loop Size = 14 Can't unroll; loop not terminated by
2008 Feb 25
3
eos on continued page
On 25-Feb-08, at 9:34 AM, xiphmont@xiph.org wrote: > I'd say both; libogg should ignore the incomplete packet or flag a > structural error, and the spec should be clarified. I guess libogg should return -1 if you try to ogg_stream_packetout() after the eos packet. The eos flag pretty clearly applies to the *page* not the packet, so I think how that gets translated into the