similar to: VQ: elucidations!

Hi, I am using speex 1.2beta2 on a narrowband 16-bit, 8khz system that has a severe program space problem and will not fit speex in its normal operation. In an attempt to shrink speex I placed a breakpoint in every function and ran a decode and encode and removed the breakpoints that I hit. in the functions that had a breakpoint that I didn't hit I commented out those functions (as well as

for the bits init I am using speex_bits_set_bit_buffer and I don't use the write to or read from because the data is already in the buffer I am reading from and I am writing to the final buffer so I don't need to move arrays around. what part is the vocoder part of the decode? Thanks for your help! -Mike >>> Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> 08/06/07

I'm glad to hear that my data size can be shrunk considerably, however I do not know the minimum values that I would set the static arrays to be. I hate to be a bother but could you tell me the minimum values for these arrays/structures in the state structure? Thanks! encode: stack winBuf excBuf swBuf lagWindow old_lsp old_qlsp mem_sp mem_sw mem_sw_whole mem_exc mem_exc2 pi_gain pitch

Thank you, I really appreciate the help. -Mike >>> Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> 08/07/07 8:34 AM >>> Michael Jacobson a ?crit : > I'm glad to hear that my data size can be shrunk considerably, > however I do not know the minimum values that I would set the static > arrays to be. I hate to be a bother but could you tell me the >

Hello! I'm an Italian student in computer engineering (University "Federico II" of Naples) and I have to write my graduation thesis in the field of signal processing. My teacher (Prof. Giovanni Poggi http://www.diet.unina.it/giovanni.poggi/) has published a research about multiple description vector quantizers by means of the self organizing maps, applying his idea to the images and

Hi, I am using speex 1.2beta2 on a 24bit DSP that has a severe program and data space limitations. I am only interested in the speex decoder for 11kbps narrowband implementation. I am using the following parameters and structures 160, /*frameSize*/ 40, /*subframeSize*/ 10, /*lpcSize*/ 17, /*pitchStart*/ 144, /*pitchEnd*/ /* 11 kbps medium bit-rate

Most asm statements clobber ASTAT bits (shifts, maxes, etc...) but do declare the register as clobbered. Same thing with CC in a few places. Some places make an attempt at clobbering some hardware loop registers, but it's very incomplete compared with how many asm statements actually use hardware loops. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo.org> --- libspeex/bfin.h

Hi, I've attached a patch against SVN r14645 which adds GCC visibility information to all symbols exported from libspeex.so and libspeexdsp.so. It includes a configure.ac change to test that both the compiler flags and __attribute__((visibility)) works, and if so will #define EXPORT __attribute__((visibility("default"))) and if not #define EXPORT I've attached a diff output

Hi, I've attached a patch against SVN r14645 which adds GCC visibility information to all symbols exported from libspeex.so and libspeexdsp.so. It includes a configure.ac change to test that both the compiler flags and __attribute__((visibility)) works, and if so will #define EXPORT __attribute__((visibility("default"))) and if not #define EXPORT I've attached a diff output

Fix a xl/libxl segfault when assigning a device to the guest (bug http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1713). Signed-off-by: Gianni Tedesco <gianni.tedesco@citrix.com> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> diff -r b05892ff0fce tools/libxl/libxl_pci.c --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_pci.c Tue Jan 25 15:14:52 2011 +0000 +++

Hello, The denoiser was good with a car noise or a raod noise before the r11739. But for some situation, the actual version is perfect. That's why I think that if we can adjust the agressivity of the denoiser, we can respond to all of the situations. Maybe two parameters should be enough : high or low. For the AEC, I have to test with older versions because it's another person that

Hello, Is it possible to adjust the level of the denoiser ? In an old beta, before you change the aggressiveness of the denoiser, it works very well with the noise of a car, a road etc... but not now. The AEC too works very well in a old beta, but now, I think there is a problem... I have tested it with the same sound card (WB 16000). In any case, your project is the best VOIP library in this

Kemal, It sounds like you are doing something wrong. I strongly recommend that you profile your application to see exactly where the CPU time is being spent. AMD happens to have a nice profiler called CodeAnalyst that they give away for free. And it's plenty usable on Intel CPUs as well. http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/DevelopWithAMD/0,,30_2252_3604,00.html Make sure you test a

Thank you Bert, and Wichert. I know I can put my iproute2 commands in /etc/rc.local. Is there any other place I can save my commands? I just want know so I do not have to retype all of the command on reboot. Thx again Mike Tedesco _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Hi, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Not sure I understand your question. Change the order of what within what? In cb_search, we iterate nb_subvect times over a codebook, finding nb_subvect codebook entries to quantize the excitation signal. After finding these nb_subvect codebook entries, they're written into the stream: /*save indices*/ for (i=0;i<nb_subvect;i++) {

Hi, I''ve been trying to boot stefano''s minimal dom0 kernel from git://xenbits.xen.org/people/sstabellini/linux-pvhvm.git 2.6.36-rc1-initial-domain-v2+pat On xen-unstable, I get the following WARN_ON()''s from Xen when bringing up the NIC''s, then the machine hangs forever when trying to login either over serial or NIC. (XEN) Xen WARN at msi.c:649 (XEN) ----[

libxenlight exports a function libxl_uuid2string which is used internally in several places but has one external caller in xl. The function mainly implements policy so should not be part of the libxenlight API. The extent to which it can be considered mechanism it is not a xen mechanism since UUID''s are not a concept exlusive to xen. The one caller in xl seems to be an

Hi, All Intel QA conducted a full validation for xen 4.1 rc1, it includes VT-x, VT-d, SRIOV, RAS, TXT and xl tools testing. 24 issues were exposed. Refer the bug list, please. We already assigned 14 bugs to Intel developers (which has an ''Intel'' tag in the bug title), most of the rest 10 bugs are related xl command. For the these bugs, need community''s help to fix

Dear All, I am pretty new to R and thus my question may sound silly. Is there a way to automatically generate a series of separate vectors (so not arranged in a matrix), without typing and changing every time the values, and store them as separate *xlsx file, where the "*" is replaced by the name of the vector itself? What i would like to create is a total of 12 vectors,

Hi, So I see in: split_cb_shape_sign_unquant this call is going wrong: ind[i] = speex_bits_unpack_unsigned(bits, params->shape_bits); ind as a way negative number- basically this should return bet. 0-255 or somesuch right? So seems like I need to reset speex at this point if if (ind[i] > 256) like the note says. So I guess my question is is this range still valid? also what is the