similar to: CELT 0.5.0 is out

Hi Jean-Marc, 1. Why CELT versus Speex? 2. What's the RTP payload for CELT, so we can add it in Yate? 3. What are the SDP declaration parameters? Diana Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm happy to announce CELT version 0.5.0. This release includes > simplifications to the bit allocation code and includes a new > low-complexity mode that can be enabled (without

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Diana Cionoiu a ?crit : >> Hi Jean-Marc, >> >> 1. Why CELT versus Speex? > > There's nearly no overlap between Speex and CELT. CELT is much higher > quality, very low latency, and of course, higher bit-rate than Speex. So > it really depends on the application. > >> 2. What's the RTP payload for CELT,

On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Aymeric Moizard a ?crit : >>> None of that is defined yet, though I'm open to suggestions on how to do >>> the mapping. >> >> CELT/44100 and CELT/48000 >> a=fmtp:105 stereo=on >> >> probably a latency value? > > It would definitely need a frame_size value > >> "CELT"

Diana Cionoiu a ?crit : > Hi Jean-Marc, > > 1. Why CELT versus Speex? There's nearly no overlap between Speex and CELT. CELT is much higher quality, very low latency, and of course, higher bit-rate than Speex. So it really depends on the application. > 2. What's the RTP payload for CELT, so we can add it in Yate? > 3. What are the SDP declaration parameters? None of that

Use Jingle, anyway Jingle kicks SIP on almost every aspect. Especially on the way the standards are made. Diana David Hogan wrote: >> I understand, but CELT would be useless for SIP if one can't >> > read/guess > >> correctly decoder configuration from the RTP data. >> >> One possible way to cope with this would be to have several CELT >>

Aymeric Moizard a ?crit : >> None of that is defined yet, though I'm open to suggestions on how to do >> the mapping. > > CELT/44100 and CELT/48000 > a=fmtp:105 stereo=on > > probably a latency value? It would definitely need a frame_size value > "CELT" doesn't seems to be used for any other existing audio related > stuff? right? Not yet.

Is it all right to discuss CELT here? I haven't seen any specific mailing list for it yet. I would like to ask if someone could provide me one or two sample Ogg CELT files, so I could test detection in ogginfo. I know CELT content isn't really supposed to be around as files since it would lose all the format's latency advantages, but I assume people can create them if need be. -Ivo

Hi all, I am the developer of the llcon software (llcon.sf.net) which is a software making it possible for musicians to play in real-time over the internet. Up to now I have used ADPCM or no audio coding. Gregory Maxwell was pointing me to the great CELT project. Using CELT has the advantage to be able to use higher sample rates, getting lower code rate and better error concealment. I have

hey great job with the celt codec. im very eager to use it. im just wondering how? there is little to no documentation on how to use the celt codec. is there anyway to encode an icecast stream using the celt codec? or is there any software with celt support built in? thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi everyone, I've made several posts recently about CELT being "replaced" by the Opus codec ( http://opus-codec.org/ ) and I thought it was time to give an update on what's going on. As many of you know, I've been involved at the IETF on this new Opus codec, which essentially merge (a modified version of) Skype's SILK codec with CELT. This is more than just two codecs

Hello all, This is slightly off-topic, but should be of interest to some people on this list. I just released version 0.3.2 of the CELT ultra low-delay audio codec (http://www.celt-codec.org/). CELT is designed to encode high quality speech and music with less than 10 ms delay and at rates starting from around 32 kbit/s. This version is "special" in that it is the basis for some

Hello, I am interested in using the CELT codec for an embedded project around the DSP C55x family from TI. Is this someone has already done? Which is necessary to do that, which compiler, is there a specific configuration ? Is it necessary to have an Operating system to run the CELT codec ? Is it possible to instantiate several times the CELT codec ? Thank you in

Hi, Since our device can only handle the Celt part of Opus (due to a MIPS limitation), we have two questions: 1. Is it possible to via SDP force the remote party to send a specific mode of the 32 different possible modes or to force the remote side to use CELT only? 2. In the reference implementation of Opus it looks like the only way to force the encoder to use CELT only

Hi Jean-Marc, I got to this mailing list while trying to use the latest SPEEX version (1.2rc1) VAD capabilities. I had difficulties to successfully distinguish speech from non speech on recorded files (probably doing something wrong). Digging into the code I found out a remark saying :"*The VAD has been replaced by a hack pending a complete rewrite*". In search for answer I found out

Hi, I am an applications engineer for Texas Instruments in the UK. I am trying to port the CELT codec to the C5505, this has HW accelerated FFT engine (http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/tms320vc5505.html). I am having problems with the stack allocation. Do you have any reference code that compiles for the C55x under CCS (code composer studio)? *******************************

Hi everyone, Just wanted to let you know that 0.8.0 is out. You can get it from the usual place and here's the small notes that go with it: "CELT 0.8.0 brings quality improvements for high bit-rates and for transients in general. It also adds the possibility of changing the frame size dynamically, which requires a minor change in the API. At last, the new PLC algorithm from 0.7.1 is

Hi, I'd like to know the reasons why CELT supports only signals with sampling frequency in the range of 32-96 kHz. In effect, it can clearly outperform speex at high bitrates, and has potential to be used in high quality voice communications even for 11, 16 and 22 kHz speech signals. It could also compete with SILK codec (to be soon released by Skype). See this page for more specifications

# make make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/celt-0.7.0' Making all in libcelt make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/celt-0.7.0/libcelt' /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -s -O3 -march=i686 -fvisibility=hidden -W -Wstrict-prototypes -Wall -Wextra -Wcast-align -Wnested-externs -Wshadow -Wno-parentheses

In some conditions (sample rate, frame size, bytes per frame, audio data) the CELT allocator may run out of bits and attempt to place a negative number of pulses in a band. This causes an array underrun and other assorted nastyness. Patch attached. (It should also apply cleanly to 0.5.0 which is also impacted by this bug). -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

What is the best option for beginner to try Celt codec, i will try to test live audio from point a to point b. Is there any windows solution? Ekiga? Kreso -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20100214/5f3e4247/attachment-0002.htm