similar to: Jitter buffer latency

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "Jitter buffer latency"

2008 Jan 14
1
Jitter buffer latency
Hi Jean-Marc, Thanks for your response. Given a worst case scenario, what is the "worst case" latency (in terms of Speex frames) that the jitter buffer algorithm will incur? We're trying to determine the worst case hard number. Sorry for unclear question below; what I was trying to ask is that given a worst case latency (which I'm asking in the first question) inherent in
2007 Jan 15
1
Request for sample snippet of how to use jitter buffer
Hi, sorry for the repost again, but does anyone have a code snippet example of how to use the jitter buffer? Regards, Andy ----- Original Message ---- From: Andy Ngo <ndno72-speex@yahoo.com> To: speex-dev@xiph.org Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 8:09:10 PM Subject: [Speex-dev] Sample snippet of how to use jitter buffer Hi, I searched around in the Speex manual and API but
2007 Jan 26
2
Jitter buffer white paper?
Hi, Is there a white paper describing how the jitter buffer in Speex works and what "side effects" (such as introducing delay) can happen? In the past, I have implemented a similar "dual buffer" algorithm to try to smooth out lost or delayed packets with a fixed know delay (no larger than 2 times the Speex frame). Thanks. Regards, Andy -------------- next part
2007 Jan 29
1
How to reduce jitter buffer size?
Hi, I looked at the jitter buffer code and it seems like the maximum number of frames that Speex can hold up to is 200 (SPEEX_JITTER_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE). This is equivalent to 4 seconds (20msec/frame * 200 frames). Can I just reduce this constant to limit the size? I know I'll reduce the smoothness of delayed frames but I want to reduce the delay in case my audio application isn't
2007 Aug 10
1
Jitter buffer latency
Hi, I'm trying to use the jitter buffer feature that comes with Speex but I'm getting unexpected latency. I wrote a client application that does VOIP-like functions and without using jitter buffer, the end-to-end latency is around 250 ms (I'm using lowband 5.97 kpbs). However, when I tried to incorporate the jitter buffer feature, the latency would grow as time elapsed (up to a few
2007 Jan 04
3
Speex support for TI DaVinci processor
Thanks Jean-Marc. Is there a Speex trunk for the C64xx I can use? Or do I have to figure what options to turn on (in configure) when building the library? Thanks. Regards, Andy Ngo ----- Original Message ---- From: Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> To: ndno72-speex@yahoo.com Cc: jtrantow@ieee.org; speex-dev@xiph.org Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2006 2:52:02 PM Subject:
2004 Nov 10
2
Jitter buffer
Hi Jean and Steve, Can you tell me whether the jitter filter / buffer is adaptive type, I saw the description of speex_jitter.h say it is "adaptive", anyone of the group has implemented it and confirm it. Thank you all. Regards, Danny Chan -----Original Message----- From: speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org] On Behalf Of Jean-Marc Valin Sent: Tuesday,
2007 Mar 18
2
Problem with the svn jitter buffer
I use the speex version of your jitter, and in speex_jitter_get, you always call the jitter_buffer_update_delay. -----Original Message----- From: Jean-Marc Valin [mailto:jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca] Sent: dimanche 18 mars 2007 13:06 To: Ouss Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Problem with the svn jitter buffer > I think that the new Jitter Buffer have a problem. > >
2004 Sep 07
2
Jitter buffer
Hmm, I tried... I completly understand an idea of jitter buffer and I know there is a lot of kinds of this solution (eg. AJB - Adaptive Jitter Buffer). I simply want to know what type is used in speex codec and how could I use that. What is the reason for using jitter buffer implemented in speex against to my own (implemented at lower layer - transmission layer - eg. rtp). Kapul On Tue, Sep
2007 Dec 23
1
Nominal Jitter buffer Configuration.
Hi All, I have a question regarding the nominal jitter buffer configuration: The call was setup as G.729A (annexb=no), ptime=20ms and nominal jitter buffer size = 50ms, and round trip delay is 200ms, the TDM side will experience intermittent one way voice during the call, but IP side can always heard the voice from TDM side. My question is, should this possible caused by the nominal jitter
2007 Mar 18
2
Problem with the svn jitter buffer
Since r12660, the speex_jitter_get with high latency doesn?t works, I have no sound. Before this release, the speex_jitter_get works in all conditions. speex_jitter_get return void, then I cannot know the reason of this problem. Regards Ouss -----Original Message----- From: Jean-Marc Valin [mailto:jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca] Sent: dimanche 18 mars 2007 23:07 To: Ouss Cc:
2005 Sep 18
2
How does the jitter buffer "catch up"?
Thank you for a very good explanation which shed light on some of the questions that I had after reading the source code. Reading your text however, I wonder if I'm perhaps missing an important point on the proper use of the jitter buffer: ... > Now, clearly, if early_ratio is high and late_ratio is very > low, the buffer is buffering more than it needs to; it will > skip a frame
2007 Aug 31
2
Latency, Jitter and Lost packets...
Hi, Does anybody know any software that give me Latencty, Jitter and Lost packets to analyze my Call quality ??? Luis -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070831/47350d13/attachment.htm
2004 Nov 14
1
Jitter buffer
Danny Chan wrote: >Hi Jean and Steve, > >Can you tell me whether the jitter filter / buffer is adaptive type, I >saw the description of speex_jitter.h say it is "adaptive", anyone of >the group has implemented it and confirm it. > > I believe it is adaptive, but no, I haven't used it, because it's coupled only to the speex codec. We're working on a
2004 Nov 15
2
Jitter buffer
Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >>I believe it is adaptive, but no, I haven't used it, because it's >>coupled only to the speex codec. We're working on a generic >>application and codec-independent jitter buffer algorithm, for use in >>asterisk and iaxclient (at least). Some information is available at
2004 Nov 16
2
Jitter buffer
Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >>OK, I'm actually about ready to start working on this now. >> >>If people in the speex community are interested in working with me on >>this, I can probably start with the speex buffer, but I imagine >>there's going to be a lot more work needed to get this where I'd like >>it to go. >> >> > >And where
2004 Aug 06
1
Voip Jitter Buffer
('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) I'm working on a voip project with Speex and the only major design obstacle left (that I'm aware of) is the jitter buffer. Before I attempt to write something of my own I'd like to try out the jitter buffer functions in Speex's unstable release. Can anyone give me a basic run down of how the experimental jitter buffer is
2005 Sep 22
1
How does the jitter buffer "catch up"?
> Hello, Hi :) First off, could you try to set your email client to break long lines before transmitting? In my (somewhat outdated) pine, the lines appear as VERY long lines when I try to reply, making it hard to read :) Minor detail though, I should probably fix pine. Some day. > The way you describe how the jitter buffer should be implemented makes me > wonder: How does the
2009 Dec 30
1
Force Jitter Buffer for SIP to SIP calls
We have a customer on a wireless connection that has very bad jitter. They can hear people fine, but people have a very hard time hearing them. They are connected via a SPA-2102. It is a SIP client going to a SIP trunk. Something like this in sip.conf [general] would be in effect for all SIP clients: jbenable = yes jbmaxsize = 150 jbresyncthreshold = 1000 jbimpl = fixed jblog = yes I only want
2007 Mar 17
2
Problem with the svn jitter buffer
Hello, I think that the new Jitter Buffer have a problem. It works perfectly when I call the speex_jitter_put every 20ms (on my lan) but in other case (with big latency on Internet connexion), it doesn't works. The old version is OK in all cases. Hope it will helps. Thanks Ouss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: