similar to: Microsoft RTAudio

Hello Jean: Big mistake!! One of the three things that a supplier should never discuss is politics ... that's business 101. Speex may be a very good product, but we will never use it because of the politics that you espouse ... some of us out here believe strongly in the free market. And we also know that monopolies can't exist because entrepreneurs will always exploit the

> Just wondered what your thoughts are on Microsoft's RTAudio codec > that they use in their Unified Communications stuff: > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=5D79B584-79C9-42A8-90C4-4AB3F03D19C4&displaylang=en The document is interesting... So it took them 6 years to come up with a codec that has almost the same structure as Speex (sub-band CELP --

Hello Ivo: One more from me and I suppose a retort by you and that's it ... no flame war please. Let's see if we can keep this discussion objective. I've had enough life experience to have seen and heard the mistakes you've made many times. Point by point: * This is a tech list that I joined a number of years ago because of a serious intent to use the Speex product in my

B. Mitchell Loebel wrote: Firstly when you talk about the main Speex developer, you should call him his proper name "Jean-Marc" rather than "Jean". > I now choose to probably not use the product > because I choose not to support anti free market thinking. Choice is good. > * Free Market is not an American Capitalist > "buzz word" as you

Hello Mr Loebel, > that's business 101 Speex is a not business, nor is Jean-Marc selling a product. The Xiph.Org Foundation, of which Jean-Marc is a member with his Speex project, is a non-profit organization. > Speex may be a very good product, but we will never use it because of > the politics that you espouse If you would like to pay for a special US$1000 Speex license,

Hello LWATCDR: OK with me, but 1) I'm a Microsoft stockholder and 2) I'm not going to stand still for people trashing Capitalist successes!! 'Nuff said. At 03:34 PM 9/4/2007 -0400, LWATCDR wrote: >1. I really HATE POLITICS. >2. I think Speex is a great solution to the problem of compressing >human speech. >3. Good heavens people can we please stop throwing around words

Hello Monty: I'm OK with not continuing this on the Speex tech list. In fact, I've deliberately responded off list to the various posters. I do think, though, that your admonitions to be non political should go to both sides ... that Jean-Marc founded Speex doesn't give him license to denigrate other efforts. Thomas Leigh asked a perfectly legitimate question and Jean-Marc's

B. Mitchell Loebel wrote: > Hello LWATCDR: > > OK with me, but 1) I'm a Microsoft stockholder and 2) I'm not going to > stand still for people trashing Capitalist successes!! 'Nuff said. How about if I sell you a copy of speex. Buy low, sell high seems like a good capitalist plan, and then you could feel good about using Speex! Ben -- Ben Greear

1. I really HATE POLITICS. 2. I think Speex is a great solution to the problem of compressing human speech. 3. Good heavens people can we please stop throwing around words like communist and socialism. 4. Government funded research has done a lot for the US and other countries. Going all the way back to the NACA cowling and airfoils that where vital in the development of airliners and the fighters

Firstly, thanks Dave for all your hard work. Ferret Rocks!, I am just testing 0.11.4.win32 and it seems to work just fine, however the index creation phase of my app is perhaps 3x slower under 0.11.4 vs 0.10.9 Details follow: System: windows xp sp2, index on local hard disk, Ruby 1.8.6 Run #1, Ferret 0.10.9 - Reboot - Build index, 35,000 rows added in 297 seconds - Run #2, Ferret 0.11.4 -

[Note to R. Wolff -- thanks for the pointers and the program. As I understand its workings, it would run as root and bind a listen port to a particular program -- with a list being supplied in /etc/portadmin or other file. Basically, a listen wrapper. Hopefully this message will address your cleanup concerns in my previous message. Thanks. Also, you may want to provide a moderator''s

Hi, all!!! What will Asterisk do in the following case: For example, we have 4 licenses, and have 4 simultaneous calls, using G729. Will asterisk allow incoming calls from peer, that can talk G729 and ulaw, and will it force it somehow to use ulaw in this case? All phones there in LAN behind Asterisk prefer GSM codec, so it does transcoding. So, what I mean is will Asterisk fall back to use

Dear All: lme(sbp ~ cengirth, data = family, random= ~ 1 | familyid) converges but lme(sbp ~ cengirth, data = family, random= ~ cengirth | familyid) does not. I get the following message: Error in lme.formula(sbp ~ cengirth, data = family, random = ~cengirth | : iteration limit reached without convergence (9) The data has 488 rows and 154 familyid levels. For

For an analysis of data from twins, I'd like to do some rearranging in my dataframe. Currently, each twin has his or her own row. I'd like to add several columns of the co-twin's data to each row. In other words, this is the current situation: FamilyID ParticipantID IQ Digit_span 1 1 95 6 1 2 93 7 2 3 102 8 2

Dear all, When calling rlm with the following data, I get an error. (R v.1.8.1, WinXP Pro 2002 with service pack 1.) > d <- na.omit(data.frame(CPRATIO, HEIGHTZ, FAMILYID)) > c <- tapply(d$CPRATIO, d$FAMILYID, mean) > h <- tapply(d$HEIGHTZ, d$FAMILYID, mean) > c 1 2 3 6 7 9 10 11 6.000000 2.500000 3.250000

Hi List I need a quality US 800 DID over IAX for my Asterisk server, preferably one that doesn't cost the earth. Any suggestions please? Thanks -- Chris Blunt Entropy IT Ltd -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061220/4919f3cb/attachment.htm

Hello, I have a problem with using read.csv(). I want to read a table from the ONS neighborhood statistics website which has an address:

On 10/26/20 10:26 AM, Gregory Heytings wrote: > I too would strongly advise you to use Google Workspace (the recent new > name for G Suite, previously known as Google Apps).? It's cheap, very > reliable, and has all features you can dream of, including an > autoresponder.? It's unrealistic to think that it's possible to beat a > service that costs a mere USD 6 / user

Dear R users I am analysing data from a group of twins and their siblings. The measures that we are interested in are all correlated within families, with the correlations being stronger between twins than between non-twin siblings. The measures are all calculated from survey answers and by definition have limited ranges (e.g. -5 to +5), though within the range they are approximately normally

Hi Reid, > Jeff, can you provide a test case that we can use to > reproduce this problem? Looks like I'm finally going to > force myself into a windows build (i.e. cough up the money > for VC++ 7.1). You can also download MS Visual C++ Toolkit 2003 - contains the VC++ 7.1 compiler/linker as well as all the standard libraries and headers. No gui, no debugger though: