similar to: Moving to Git

Not a big deal, but the "<http://xiph.org/svn.html>Subversion Access" link on http://www.speex.org/download.html page should probably point to: http://www.xiph.org/svn/ rather than: http://xiph.org/svn.html Tom ______________________________________________ Tom Harper Lead Software Engineer SightSpeed - <http://www.sightspeed.com/>http://www.sightspeed.com/ 918 Parker

Congrats Jean Marc, Just heard you got a new google assistant for the Ghost project! Tom ______________________________________________ Tom Harper Lead Software Engineer SightSpeed - <http://www.sightspeed.com/>http://www.sightspeed.com/ 918 Parker St, Suite A14 Berkeley, CA 94710 Email: tharper@sightspeed.com Phone: 510-665-2920 Fax: 510-649-9569 My SightSpeed Video Link:

re: At 03:22 PM 10/25/2005, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >Are you really sure you didn't have some corruption elsewhere? Totally possible- this is the first time this has happened that I know of in many many hours of usage- On the other hand, this null check isn't in my code base and it was in nb_decode_lost, and nb_encode- so I figured it was just an oversight- Tom

Jean-Marc, So I saw in the latest code that the vad in the preprocessor is gone/going to be re-written. Is there a plan as far as this goes? Just wondering as the current one seems to work pretty well. Thanks! Tom ______________________________________________ Tom Harper Lead Software Engineer SightSpeed - <http://www.sightspeed.com/>http://www.sightspeed.com/ 918 Parker St, Suite A14

Hi, So I got a crash on the following code: k1=SUBMODE(lpc_enh_k1); k2=SUBMODE(lpc_enh_k2); which in the newer codebase is: bw_lpc(SUBMODE(lpc_enh_k1), st->interp_qlpc, awk1, st->lpcSize); bw_lpc(SUBMODE(lpc_enh_k2), st->interp_qlpc, awk2, st->lpcSize); I am not sure if the newer code will have the same issue but the following check is

At 12:35 PM 10/6/2004, Matthias Granberry wrote: >There is some SSE assembly >language, but it's in GCC/AT&T syntax rather than the windows-standard >Intel syntax, so you might have to do some of your own translation to >something your compiler understands. We submitted an intel patch a ways back- maybe it is in the archives somewhere... Tom -- Tom Harper -

Hello The st->zeta pointer isn't freed in the speex_preprocess_state_destroy() function of the preprocess.c file (alloced in line 167). It's in Speex 1.1.4 by the way. I'm trying to make the denoiser work with my application and has got reasonable noise reduction after applying the denoiser. I, however, haven't been able to find any information of what the purpose of

Current SVN compilation fails on Win32 (Intel C++ compiler 9.0): ..\..\libspeex\mdf.c(317): error: declaration may not appear after executable statement in block float adapt_rate; Just moved it up to the variable declaration block to solve it locally, but as it's not valid C, I thought I'd mention it ;) PS: With the same compiler, AGC fails horribly (Zlast goes to several

Jean Marc & list, Following up on this- there seems to be an issue with this calculation in mdf.c (Smooth echo energy estimate over time) Pey += Eh*Yh; Pyy += Yh*Yh; it goes too large for floating point, which seems to be caused by extremely large values in st->Rf[j], st->Yf[j] and smaller values in st->Eh[j], st->Yh[j]- things were relatively quiet

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: preproc_patch_dth_10_26_05.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 8774 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20051026/c27a3ed6/preproc_patch_dth_10_26_05.obj

Hey, thanks for sharing this information. If this is true, it could explain some intermittent problems I've had, since I do encoding and decoding in separate threads. I assumed that Speex was thread-safe because there doesn't seem to be a connection between the encoder and decoder, and the encoder and decoder require separate states for different streams. I'm curious to know

Jean-Marc and others, We are using Speex inside our Video Conferencing application and have some questions about the trade-off of complexity vs bitrate. A little background information is needed: 1. For us the actual bit-rate isn't that big a deal. Speex running at 14kbps or 8 kbps is minor compared to the video traffic running at 128, 256 or 384 kbps. 2. We care a little about

I'm not sure if this is due to the same problem, but I get the same clipping behavior when trying to use VAD+denoiser on a particular mic+speaker setup that has significant background noise (enough to really foul up the codec should the denoiser be turned off.) Leaving VAD off and transmitting continuously seems to be the only way to avoid this clipping. Another person I regularly

Can anyone recommend a good library for performing audio downsampling? I intend to start playing around with "libresample" (http://ccrma-www.stanford.edu/~jos/resample/README-libresample-0.1.3.txt), as well as taking a look at "Secret Rabbit Code" (http://www.mega-nerd.com/SRC/), but I'd love some opinions before I get too involved with either. Free would be best, but

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: speex_vs2008_part2.diff Type: application/octet-stream Size: 11265 bytes Desc: speex_vs2008_part2.diff Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20071128/136ce70d/speex_vs2008_part2-0001.obj

Hi Jean Marc & List, So I have been fiddling with the denoiser (again). While poking around I noticed that nb_preprocess is basically a counter that is mod-ded with 100 (the default), which causes Smin[] to be re- seeded with the value in Stmp[] (min of the previous adaptation period). Smin[] is then used to update the noise probability, which is (probably) less likely when adaptation

Hi, I try to use Speex codec into Win32 platforms. However, I find the CPU bandwidth usage is very heavy on a Pentium 3 machine. Compare to Microsoft's G723.1 codec, speex 8k is using more than 20% cpu bandwidth. Does anyone know what is the best version of Speex to "beat" the Microsoft's G723.1's on CPU bandwidth usage? Does Speex have MMX-enabled codes? thanks very

Hello, Iam being to compile speexenc but I have the following error: LINK : warning LNK4098: defaultlib "LIBCMTD" conflicts with use of other libs; use /NODEFAULTLIB:library libspeex.lib(lsp.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _spx_cos Debug/speexenc.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals Error executing link.exe. Please, help me Guillaume --- >8 ---- List

Tom Harper wrote: > Hi All & Jean Marc, > > Once again I find myself delving into the pre-processing code to fiddle > with the VAD, AGC and denoising code. > > Where i am at is that I have implemented all of Steve Kann's mods, and > they are 90% of the way there in terms of working, except that I am still > having issues denoising open air mics. But that is

There is a port to mingw, which is what many folks use now: http://repo.or.cz/w/git/mingw.git I haven't had a chance to fiddle with it yet so ymmv. Tom At 06:00 AM 6/9/2007, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >Hi everyone, > >I'm currently attempting to move Speex development over to Git. Because >Git is distributed, I means that anyone would be able to do development >and commits