similar to: Speex compile/rpmbuild issue on x86_64

The flags -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use are currently ignored for GCC compatibility. I would like to enable them and give them similar semantics to GCC. These flags are baked pretty deeply into our build environment, so supporting them at the driver level will make our lives a lot simpler. >From https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html:

I am attempting to get our RSA SecurID tokens working in CentOS: http://www.rsa.com/node.aspx?id=1177 Has anyone had any experience with this? I know CentOS is not supported but one would think that it could be easily implemented... Here's the error I'm receiving: May 13 10:26:21 sshd[1662]: @(#)RSA Authentication Agent 5.3 for PAM [263] May 13 10:26:21 sshd[1662]: Entered

I have one dedicated server for all my various projects (both PHP as well as Rails) and will be getting a second server to run only the Rails apps on. What is the ideal server setup in terms of RAM vs. Processor Speed (more RAM or more processor speed?) and should I use Apace, lighttpd, mongrel, or what? I''ve got the money to afford something pretty solid...just don''t know

On 2015 Jun 17, at 13:53, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote: > The flags -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use are currently ignored > for GCC compatibility. I would like to enable them and give them > similar semantics to GCC. These flags are baked pretty deeply into > our build environment, so supporting them at the driver level will > make our lives a lot

All of the emails I get from the list have the correct time with the exception of the typical list slowness. All of your emails (and only your emails and spam) are approximately 11 or twelve hours in the future. The email I am responding to has the correct day but the time reads 11:13 PM. I am using Thunderbird 2.0.0.5. If using Outlook, I think the time is correct. Thanks, Steve Rehan

Is it possible to define variable at this level. I need to pass the monit config file name ( sometimes its monitrc sometimes in not ). Here is what I have. # /etc/puppet/manifests/nodes.pp node basenode { include postgresql include monit include wiki include apace } node ''freebeerontuesdays.com'' inherits basenode { } -- You received this message because you are

Hi everyone, I am a complete newbie to rsync. Last year I built and setup my own web server based on an old Intel PII box running at 333Mhz. There is plenty of RAM and HD space, but the site is now growing apace. A few weeks ago while upgrading my office equipment I set aside another box running an AMD Athlon at 1.1GHz. Still plenty of RAM and drive space. Both systems are setup us as servers

I assume most people here know what a joke DIDX is -- but in case you didn't already know, please avoid these people. Basic features of their service don't work, their tech support refuses/drags their feet to fix them for a month and if you post publicly about them, they terminate your service. Instead of investing their effort in reading mailinglists to terminate customers maybe they

Alexander Chemeris wrote: > Hi, > > On 5/27/08, Thorvald Natvig <thorvald at natvig.com> wrote: > >> And here's a patch for Intel Math Kernel Library. This allows commercial >> users of Speex to use a high-speed FFT library that isn't GPL'd. (You do >> need to pay for it though). This is 3 times faster than the default FFT in >> speex, and

On 4/9/2011 6:09 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jack, thanks for the numbers. Any chance of analysing why gcc does better on > those where it does much better than dragonegg? > > Ciao, Duncan. Also, does -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns get Dragonegg to match GCC performance where GCC was faster? Marcus

On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 08:56:49AM -0600, Marcus G. Daniels wrote: > On 4/9/2011 6:09 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > > Hi Jack, thanks for the numbers. Any chance of analysing why gcc does better on > > those where it does much better than dragonegg? > > > > Ciao, Duncan. > Also, does -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns get Dragonegg to > match GCC performance

Trying to build today's svn on fc5, gcc-4.1.0,amd64: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -I../include -I.. -I/usr/include -O2 -fPIC -funswitch-loops -ftree-loop-linear -march=k8 -ftree-vectorize -pipe -mfpmath=sse -frename-registers -O3 -msse -MT nb_celp.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/nb_celp.Tpo -c nb_celp.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/nb_celp.o nb_celp.c: In function 'nb_encode':

Hi, I am trying to turn on the new GCC auto-vectorization feature within llvmgcc4. Below is the command I used, but nothing was vectorized. Does it mean that llvmgcc4 has disabled this optimization and all I can do is to embed SSE intrinsics in the source code by hand? Thanks! ./llvm-gcc4-x86/bin/llvm-gcc -c -O2 -ftree-vectorize -msse -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=5 -emit-llvm vec.c -o vec.bc

Viswanath Puttagunta wrote: > I responded to your feedback before I started on RFCv3.. and took your > silence as approval :).. I guess that email got lost in your inbox sea > some where.. so re-posting the responses. Sorry, I did see it but I guess I read it rather more quickly than I thought. Apologies for that. > guidance. I wouldn't know where else to put this. Without

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 19:34, Rehan Allah Wala <rehan at supertec.com> wrote: > Your service is still up and working, Because Suzanne Bowen has better judgment than you. > You did charge back on the payment to us, That is correct. There is $86 balance in my account I did not expect to get back by just asking for it. > We are being nice to you and you do not understand the

Some question. Can I install Xen-3.2.1 with 2.6.18-xen kernel... to my Dom0 and without HVM, starting a debian(DomU) with kernel 2.6.25 from kernel src and compiled with all XEN port / features ? or i need to use the vmlinuz-2.6.18-xen to all my DomU ?? Thanks Crazy _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

Hello All, Anyone here has experience of accepting a ilbc call and sending it on g711 or g729 I am having problem in VOICE , call goes though but there is no voice. Senario: Call is coming in from Machine A to Machine B, sending to Machine C Machine B is an asterisk box, transcoding it from IBLC to G711 and g729. Problem: Voice is not appearing on the sip user sitting on machine A Already

Does llvmgcc4 convert the high-level AST to LLVM (like llvmgcc3x) or does it go from GIMPL to LLVM? If the latter, would it be possible to allow some TreeSSA optimizations before emitting LLVM? --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ On Jul 31, 2006, at 1:10 PM, Devang Patel wrote: > llvmgcc4 emits LLVM byte code before executing GCC optimizations, > so one

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:44 AM Eric Christopher via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016, 6:41 PM Xinliang David Li via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> Sounds fine to me, though I am not a fan of using unstable in the option. >> I think a more meaningful way (that capture the essence of the

Zooming into the command-line option bike-shed: > On 2016-May-24, at 15:41, Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > At its core I don't think -fprofile-instr-generate *implies* FE-based instrumentation. So, I'd like to see the driver do this (on all platforms): > > * -fprofile-instr-generate: IR instrumentation > *