similar to: setting SSE at runtime (speex_set_asm)

Hi, Ok, what you suggest sound logical to me. Currently, I have done a small trick to prevent this problem. What I did is that whenever windows request a voice packet from me and if I do not have the voice packet, I repeat the previous packet. Hence, all the breaking portion is filled with previous packet. This trick seems to work so far. I am not sure what is the side effect. I think jitter

Hi, I've been getting reports of stuttering audio in my VoIP application that uses Speex 1.1.11. Since I haven't had this report with previous versions of Speex I was wondering if one of the bug fixes in 1.1.12 solves a bug which causes the stuttering. To me the stuttering report sounds like the decoder state that speex uses gets messed up. Some info, I use the floating point version of

Hi Jean-Marc, For the residue in the echo_cancel function I pass in a pointer to an array of floats. First I used an array the size of the framesize, but I discovered this causes crashes because the echo_cancel funtion writes framesize+1 floats to the pointer. I find this plus one strange, since almost all things are exactly the framesize. Is this an error in the echo_cancel function or simply

Hi, I saw there is a new release of speex. What is this SPEEX_PLC_TUNING option for? And is there a more complete list of changes? Because I like to determine if it is interesting to update to 1.1.8 Greetings Jeroen de Kleijn (developer of VoIPerized)

Hi, When an audiopacket is received too late I could interpolate this frame. The problem is that I don't know if it is a true bufferloss or just the last audiopacket of a talkspurt. Now my question is if it's harmfull for the audioquality that at the end of the talkspurt one frame is interpolated? Or would this be almost inpossible to hear since the last audiopacket in the talkspurt

Le jeudi 03 mars 2005 ? 20:29 +0100, Kleijn, J.S. de a ?crit : > I use the Intel compiler 7.0 , and it doesn't like it Does it have an option to enable C99? Otherwise, if you're aware of another mechanism that allows it to allocate temporary stuff on the stack, I might be able to support it. Jean-Marc > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Jean-Marc Valin

On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:36:51 +0200, Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin@USherbrooke.ca> wrote: > Source code at: > http://people.xiph.org/~jm/speexclient/ I rewritten my program so it is more similar to yours, I grabbed your code for storing and retrieving echo, and I have better results, I think the echo is cancelled in about 50% but it still can be heared. I think there is a

> Ok, what you suggest sound logical to me. Currently, I > have done a small trick to prevent this problem. What > I did is that whenever windows request a voice packet > from me and if I do not have the voice packet, I > repeat the previous packet. Hence, all the breaking > portion is filled with previous packet. This trick > seems to work so far. I am not sure what is the

Hi everyone, As many noticed, I just released 1.0.5 and 1.1.8 over the weekend. There isn't much new in 1.0.5, except that I added all the API changes from 1.1.x so that it's possible to write code that will work with both 1.0.5 and 1.1.8. As for 1.1.8, here are the changes: - Initial TI C5x port: I integrated a patch from Jamey Hicks - Some fixed-point improvements and fixes - Better

Hi, I implemented the echo cancellation from speex in my Windows VOIP-client VoIPerized --> www.voiperized.com Greetings Jeroen de Kleijn -----Original Message----- From: speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org on behalf of hs Sent: Tue 10/11/2005 4:02 PM To: speex-dev@xiph.org Cc: Subject: Re: R: [Speex-dev] echo cancellation On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:36:51 ?, Jean-Marc Valin

Greetings everyone, I was about to compare AEC performance between 1.1.12 and 1.2beta1 when I noticed something. If I configure (and compile) speex-1.1.12 with ./configure --enable-shared=no --enable-static=yes it compiles and works as expected: I can run a mic and speaker signal through testecho, it runs in a reasonable amount of time (about 23 secs for 3 minutes of audio) and I get back

Hello all, I''m not sure who Camping''s steward is at this point(zimbatm? _why?), but I haven''t seen much activity in quite some time. I really like Camping, and I understand open source projects can fall by the wayside. So, I''d be willing to take over maintenance and releasing. I have experience maintaining my own open source projects, and a history of

I'll try to make some shorter samples later, but for now here are the ones I have tried with: http://www.surfnonstop.com/~bandit/speex/1.2beta1_AEC_garble/ The original recordings are in mic.raw and spk.raw. Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > You may have triggered an instability problem. Can you upload your files > somewhere so I can have a look at them? > > Jean-Marc > > Andras

Hi all, I've just released libshout 2.0. This is the official release, not a beta. Thanks to all the testers who provided feedback during the beta period. http://icecast.org/files/libshout/libshout-2.0.tar.gz Libshout 2.0 adds support for icecast 2, Ogg streaming, and IPv6, as well as bug fixes relative to libshout 1. Ogg and Vorbis are now prerequisites. Changes since beta 3: * Minor

Hi all, I've just released libshout 2.0. This is the official release, not a beta. Thanks to all the testers who provided feedback during the beta period. http://icecast.org/files/libshout/libshout-2.0.tar.gz Libshout 2.0 adds support for icecast 2, Ogg streaming, and IPv6, as well as bug fixes relative to libshout 1. Ogg and Vorbis are now prerequisites. Changes since beta 3: * Minor

Greetings I have a bunch of NAs in a column of categorical variables designating the size classes (e.g., smallest to largest: 1,2,3,4) of cave crickets. I'd like to substitute "U" (for unknown) for the NAs. Can anyone give me an idea how to do this? Thanks in advance. Cheers Kurt *************************************************************** Kurt Lewis Helf, Ph.D. Ecologist

> - set sampling rate to 8 kHz (at least for now) > - make sure the far end signal in the playback signal is always a bit in > advance (never late) compared to the mic signal. > - Set the tail length to something around 100 ms. > > Also, if you're using two different soundcards (as I understand) for the > playback and the capture, you're *never* going to get echo

hi ,all: comiple error with speex-1.2beta1 why!!?? make /gcc version error?or other lib needed???? ------------------------------------ [guor@ppe speex-1.2beta1-install]$ make -v GNU Make 3.80 Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

> There is a big difference between SSE and SSEFP. The SSEFP means > that the CPU supports the xmm registers. All Intel chips with SSE support > do, however no current 32 bit AMD chips support the XMM registers. They > will support the SSE instructions but not those registers. You are right > about the SSE2 not being used. I'm still not sure I get it. On an Athlon

> In the Atholon XP 2400+ that we have in our QA lab (Win2000 ) if you run > that code it generates an Illegal Instruction Error. In addition, an AMD > Duron (Windows ME) does the same thing. There are two possible reasons - > One is that those processors do not support xmm registers or the Operating > System does not support XMM registers. In the morning we will check the >