similar to: line 521 command not found

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.0.0-1 Hello guys, Ik running Debian stable (squeeze). I run a virtual pfsense firwall in a DomU. I created multiple bridges. The interfaces itself (except eth2 (connected to br_lan)) itself don't have a IP assigned. I use them to connect to other devices. grep my-network /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp (network-script my-network-script) root at

Hi Guys luv your product but ive become stuck since updating to Suse Linux Enterprise 9, Id luv some advice on where i should be looking to resolve this issue.. basically... when shorewall is off all ports are showing to the internet ''25,80,443,ect'' and i can ping my box from an external source. ''with stopped rule created to allow ppp0'' when shorewall is on

I am running version 3.0.7 of Shorewall on a Debian Sarge system, but when I start Shorewall I get this: /usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 204: 4: command not found I looked there and found this: # Run ip and if an error occurs, stop the firewall and quit # run_ip() { if ! ip $@ ; then if [ -z "$STOPPING" ]; then error_message "ERROR: Command \"ip

Hi, I''m running RH9 Linux and I''m having a slight problem with shorewall, i originally set it up as a two card configuration, but i have now bridged the connections in an attempt to get my WiFi network communicating with the wired network (eth0 and wlan0). I have followed the instructions for bridging from http://www.shorewall.net/bridge.html but when I activate shorewall i get

I have three ethernet card and two of them connected to diffrent ISP and has diffrent gateways. And one ethernet card is connected to local lan. I have installed iptables and configured the firwall to work as nat gateway for the users. Now I want to route only mail traffic to the perticular ISP and which I am not able to do it. I have done iproute configuration what ever lartc said. But still I

I have an Asterisk PBX on the private lan, which is protected from the public Internet with a Linux iptables machine. The firwall is it's own seperate box running NAT with SPI. I want to drop a SIP phone at my brothers house, and have it be an extension off my Asterisk box. I've been looking around at some FAQ info on forwarding ports, and also looked at siproxd. Anyway, I'm

Hello, I run Shorewall 2.0.3a backport on a debian woody box (with 2.4.18 homemade kernel). When I start shorewall I got the following errors. Oct 30 11:13:12 fwr modprobe: modprobe: Can''t locate module ipt_conntrack Oct 30 11:13:17 fwr modprobe: modprobe: Can''t locate module ipt_pkttype Oct 30 11:13:18 fwr modprobe: modprobe: Can''t locate module ipt_pkttype Oct 30

Our Client software used samba protocol,If there is no firewall case , this protocol work properly from remote site.All of firwall configuration open ( this mean is all of port open ). Samba work very well, but if some constrain put in, it doesn't work. 1)I would like to know about port usage of samba protocol. I think snmpd, nmpd daemon used some port number. i can see /etc/service file.

Has anyone gotten Apache 2.0.54 to build on CentOS 4.1? Apache 2.0.52(distrbiuted with CentOS 4.1) compiles file. This is the error: /scratch/apache2.src/httpd-2.0.54/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -pthread -DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -DAP_HAVE_DESIGNATED_INITIALIZER

I do not understand some colums in the output to ''shorewall show connections'' /root> shorewall show connections Shorewall-2.0.2f Connections at firewall - Mon Jan 3 13:12:52 PST 2005 .. tcp 6 353296 ESTABLISHED src=112.129.244.121 dst=224.81.133.205 sport=3647 dport=443 src=224.81.133.205 dst=112.129.244.121 sport=443 dport=3647 [ASSURED] use=1 I would like to know

Hi I am looking at converting a Linux terminal server box to iptables using Shorewall 2.0. (At the moment it uses ipchains). The server currently has scripts which are called as each user logs in which run a series of "ipchains" commands to set the access rights for that user (and again to cancel them when the user logs out). My plan is to replace these scripts with ones that call

>From a diff of my current shorewall firewall script with the new one from the CVS today : $ diff -w /usr/share/shorewall/firewall /usr/src/shorewall/s/firewall [...] 673c910 < for network in $networks; do --- > for networks in $networks; do I don''t think that "for networks in $networks" works well. -- -IAN! Ian! D. Allen Ottawa, Ontario,

I just installed Fedora Core 3 uname -r 2.6.9-1.667 I got the latest shorewall''s rpm: http://www.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2/shorewall-2.2.0/shorewall-2.2.0-1 .noarch.rpm Made my changes Attempted to run shorewall and got: [root@demo shorewall]# shorewall start ERROR: Can''t find iptables executable I haven''t seen this before. I tried to go through all the

Having moved from a "cascading LANs" configuration to two independent LANs on eth0 and eth1, I still get some "state INVALID" for which I am not sure what the cause is. Can somebody help me understand its probable origin? Thanks, Costantino [see attachment]

Tom, I am NOT subscribed (yet). I dropped SuSeFirewall2 in favor of shorewall to get past the configuration hurdles I as experiencing. At the moment, when my SuSe 9.1 starts up, I can see shorewall processing the rules, policies, etc. and I see no errors and then moves on with the rest of the SuSe boot process . However, no traffic passes through using the rules. I run an iptables -L and I

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

Having study a number of documents on linux traffic shaper, I started to setup my shaping rules in my network. My linux box is running RH AS3 U3, shorewall 2.0.9. It is using PPPoE connected to the Internet firewall: eth0: connect to the adsl modem eth1: private net ppp0: virtual dial up interface for pppoe There is a ftp server on the private net It is listen for port 21 and configured

My Shorewall installation was working great until yesterday when it started logging ''REJECT'' to packets that tried to cross the firewall to the internet. I tried to work past the firewall by entering "shorewall clear" but I still can''t get past the gateway / firewall machine. Does this mean the NIC is damaged? When Shorewall is running I can navigate

Hi all, I moved wshaper 1.1 cbq file to tcstart, but none of my tcrules are being observed. The only way I can set the marks is by editing the tcstart file. Is there a way to incorporate for tcstart to read and apply my set marks in tcrules? Thank you, ~Andrew Nady.

Lorenzo Martignoni at Univesita` degli Studi di Milano in Milan has established a mirror of the Shorewall web site. http://italy.shorewall.net http://cert-it.dico.unimi.it/shorewall Thanks Lorenzo! -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \