similar to: Trivial cross compilation problem

Jean-Marc, > I've got no problem cross-compiling with gcc for Blackfin. See the > README.blackfin file. Thank you for your help, Jean-Marc. I get no further with that than I did before, I'm afraid. I get: [willmore@l2 speex-1.1.11.1]$ export CC=pic30-elf-gcc [willmore@l2 speex-1.1.11.1]$ ./configure --enable-fixed-point --host=pic30-elf configure: WARNING: If you wanted to set

On 10/1/07, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > I'm aware of Microchip's closed-source port of Speex to the dsPIC. As > far as I know (haven't checked the details), this is perfectly legal, > even though I think it's a dumb decision for a company that's in the > business of selling chips. I say it's dumb because by not contributing

All, I don't know if this is widely known, but it appears that Microchip has just released a library to perform speex compression/decompression on a dsPIC processor. The library is available under their license, so I can only assume that it is a reimplementation of the algo and not a port. Does anyone know otherwise? Cheers, David

Hi, I am running speex wideband for speech. While doing that I am getting Hissing sound during silence. If you want I can give you input and output files. Thanks, Shridhar -----Original Message----- From: speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org] On Behalf Of speex-dev-request@xiph.org Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 12:30 AM To: speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: Speex-dev

Hi Roberto, The PIC24 family of devices share very little commonality with PIC16 beyond the naming convention. They're a register-based 16-bit architecture, unlike the PIC16. That said, that does mean that LLVM is a much more reasonable fit to target the PIC24 (and dsPIC) than it is for PIC16. Modeling your target files after the MSP430 or Blackfin backend is likely your best bet to get up

The test script doesn't seem to stop on error. I noticed this in the logs: ++++++ testing level 1 interface simple iterator on read-only file generating FLAC file for test testing 'metadata.flac'... 0... 1... content... PASSED is writable = 1 ERROR: iterator claims file is writable when it should not be ERROR during test_libFLAC FAIL: ./test_libFLAC.sh Platform is a mobile

Hmmm.... it's a shame.... what are the minimum requirements for Fixed Point Speex? John Villar Gerente de Proyectos Computadores Flor Hard Soft 2058 C.A. www.florhard.com Alain wrote: > Hi, no chance to run it on anything from Microchip, theyr best > processor is 16 Mips 8 bits only. For what I have been readind on this > list for more than a year you need a lot more than

I have been analyzing the implementation for some backend (PIC16, MIPS, SPARC and MSP430) my main problem is that they are so much different, I mean obviously they are describing different architectures, but the file structure is not the same. So it is difficult to get a pattern. I have checked the available documentation files, also the video from Cardoso about how to write a backend for the

Hi, I think this is a very ashamed question I have modified the version of the MSP430, after many problems it compiled, now I want to see is the changes generate what I want, but I don't know how for example with llc -march msp430 foo.ll -o newfoo.ll generates a file for the msp430 and actually did it. but I want to load my changes the --load option is supposed to do that, but the only new

Hi I was wondering if someone may help. We are currently using a DSPic to store speex data on a Smart Card. We have now decided to use a PC to playback the speex data. The only problem is our data does not have the Correct header. Do you know if there is an example in C++ that can take a string of speex frames and construct the correct Header so that it can be played back using a pc based

--- David Willmore <davidwillmore@iamanidiot.com> wrote: > > The test script doesn't seem to stop on error. I noticed this > in the logs: > > ++++++ testing level 1 interface > simple iterator on read-only file > generating FLAC file for test > testing 'metadata.flac'... 0... 1... content... PASSED > is writable = 1 > ERROR: iterator claims file

Hi David! Many thanks for your very encouraging and kind feedback!!! (Hope you don't mind that I made your post public on the Theora channel). I try to be the more sincere as I can in my posts.Some people suggested me to make demo pages to explain how the codec works step by step, and I realize that it would be good, because certainly it will show that the NHW codec is not that complex and

Hi, My company just recently bought a TI DaVinci development board and I'm trying to port Speex to run on it. The TI DaVinci chip has an ARM926 processor and a TMS320C64+ DSP in it. I was able to get Speex somewhat working on a TMS320VC5510 about a year ago but I was wondering is there anything special I need to do to get Speex working on the TMS320C64+ DSP in the DaVinci chip. I

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Fernando Alberto Marengo Rodriguez < fmarengorodriguez at yahoo.com.ar> wrote: > I am asking this because we are studying the OGG Vorbis format and its > applications. We are very interested in constructing an audio player > hardware, based on DSP or DSPic, and the audio files are stored in an SD > card. > What is your motivation for

Hi Jen-Marc, this news were very interesting because of what I intedd to use speex for... Can you make some personal comments about that? Were you involved or consulted about it? Will it make it's way into the official version? I remember that you commented a long time ago that the DSPIC version was too much of a tour-de-force to make it to the official version, but this is a much nicer

Are there any ports of Ogg decoder to dsPIC processors ? Thanks don

HA! Just when I was getting ready to drop myself from this list, along comes a ham radio question! Shoving digital voice down a 100 Hz pipe would be mighty darned tough/impossible. N0YMV has a good suggestion. Try those WSJT modes. They use narrow bandwidth and are fun to play with. There are documented instances where moon-bounce QSOs have been completed with these modes. No, it's

I was browsing through Microchips' website and came upon their Speex library. They are charging for it and looks like it is also not open source. http://www.embeddedstar.com/press/content/2005/6/embedded18391.html scroll down to the paragraph about pricing. - farhan

> What you are looking for is smbwrapper, which is in fact included with Samba > 2.0. However as it is not supported on all systems it is not included > in the default build (it should work nicely on Solaris though). > Essentially smbwrapper is a preloaded library which intercepts system calls and > simulates a /smb filesystem, so you can access /smb/SERVER/SHARE/file.txt.

farhan@phonestack.com wrote: > I was browsing through Microchips' website and came upon their Speex > library. They are charging for it and looks like it is also not open > source. > http://www.embeddedstar.com/press/content/2005/6/embedded18391.html > scroll down to the paragraph about pricing. I'm aware of Microchip's closed-source port of Speex to the dsPIC. As far