similar to: speex rtp draft feedback

Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:58:17PM -0700, Ralph Giles wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:20:05PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> >>>>> Hi Luca, >>>>> >>>>> Thank you for working on the Theora and Vorbis drafts in the IETF's AVT >>>>> WG. Do you also plan to work on the Speex draft?

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:20:05PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > >>Hi Luca, > >> > >>Thank you for working on the Theora and Vorbis drafts in the IETF's AVT > >>WG. Do you also plan to work on the Speex draft? > > > >other people are working on the speex I-D, Ralph should be able to tell > >you which to contact ^^; > > Hi Ralph,

Hi Jean-Marc, Alfred and Greg, Are you receiving the mails from IETF about draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex The mails are not coming from AVT mailing list, but I think we are all 3 part of a minimal list (draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex at tools.ietf.org) dedicated to latest discussion about the draft. I have answered some questions, but there are small changes and adaptation still required to the ietf

Hi all, Please find below an updated Speex Internet Draft document. It would be good if we could book some time for discussion on Speex at the IETF meeting in Vienna (scheduled for 14th July). The cutoff for submission is 9:00am EDT, (GMT -04:00), 30th June. Comments and feedback welcomed! Regards Phil

All: The latest draft RTP Payload Format for Speex is available via the IETF. See below for details. Greg ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 15:56:23 -0500 From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org To: IETF-Announce: ; Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-herlein-avt-rtp-speex-00.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. <p>

On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Hi Aymeric, > > Yes, I'm receiving the emails but haven't had enough time to look into > the details yet. I've seen you responded to many comments, so what are > the ones for which we still need to respond? Summary is there: https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/ballot/2837/ As I understand: we need to change

Hi all, Apologies in advance, this email is quite long. I've prepared an updated Vorbis RTP Internet Draft, which is a continuation of draft-moffitt-vorbis-rtp-00.txt which can be found below. If this new draft gets the ok I'd like to submit this to the AVT WG later this week. There are a number of changes over the original I-D, notably the changing of the M bit function in the RTP

Hi all, Below is the Vorbis RTP Internet Draft as sent to the AVT working group of the IETF. Comments and feedback is still welcomed from the Vorbis community. Cheers Phil ---------------------------8<-----------------8<------------------------ Network Working Group Phil Kerr Internet-Draft The Ogg Vorbis January 07, 2003 Community / OpenDrama

Hi! What happened to this document? Was it just left dying in the IETF system? Tor --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the

FYI, -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Colin Perkins <csp at csperkins.org> Subject: Working group last call: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-05.txt Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:25:03 +0100 Size: 2054 Url: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20080331/289739db/attachment.eml

Hi, I have a few questions/remarks about the draft, in particular about the SDP usage of Speex (section 5): - Which samplerate should be used if you receive something like m=3Daudio 8008 RTP/AVP 97 a=3Drtpmap:97 speex/8000 a=3Dfmtp:97 sr=3D16000;ebw=3Dultra - There is an inconsistency in the description of the 'penh'parameter. According to the description,

Hi all, Please find below the -01 update to draft-herlein-speex-rtp-profile, as submitted to the IETF. Regards Phil <p>-------------------8<-----------------------------------8<--------------------- <p><p>Internet Engineering Task Force Greg Herlein Internet Draft Jean-Marc Valin

Hello, What's the purpose of the 'sr' sdp parameter ? The sample rate is already given in the a=rtpmap line ? Simon Le dim 29/06/2003 à 12:12, philkerr@elec.gla.ac.uk a écrit : > Hi all, > > Please find below an updated Speex Internet Draft document. > > It would be good if we could book some time for discussion on Speex at the IETF > meeting in Vienna (scheduled

Here my comments: Page 3: To be compliant with this specification, implementations MUST support 8 kHz sampling rate (narrowband)" and SHOULD support 8 kbps bitrate. The sampling rate MUST be 8, 16 or 32 kHz. There is a type above after (narrowband), there is a " extra character. I don't understand what is the motivation to specify "SHOULD support 8 kbps

Hi All, Please find below an updated Vorbis-RTP Internet Draft document for review and discussion at the Xiph IRC meeting on Saturday. The changes in this version have been: Codebook caching mechanism Expanded SDP parameters Expanded MIME section Expanded introduction Packet loss section Minor tweaks and clarity changes to text There are probably some minor tweaks to the formatting needed

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:58:17PM -0700, Ralph Giles wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:20:05PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > > > >>Hi Luca, > > >> > > >>Thank you for working on the Theora and Vorbis drafts in the IETF's AVT > > >>WG. Do you also plan to work on the Speex draft? > > > > > >other people are working

Hi all, Please find below an I-D for the proposed registration of MIME type audio/rtp-vorbis. All comments most welcome. Barry <p>-----------8<------------- Network Working Group Barry Short Internet-Draft The Ogg Vorbis Community / OpenDrama Expires: July 7, 2003 January 7, 2003 <p>

Alfred E. Heggestad wrote: > <...> > > If we don't get any comments in 1 week (by 22. May 2007) we will go ahead > and submit it to the IETF. Of course you can comment on it also after it > has been submitted, but we would like to get the input from the Speex > community first.. > thanks for all the input. please find attached an updated version of the draft. I

Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves wrote: > Do not forget to add the "Copying conditions" to the RFC. > > Check http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments > I would be happy to add this statement. Could you let me know where to insert this statement in the xml document? I am using xml2rfc to generate the draft. Or alternatively point to other documents (.xml sources) that have the

On 6/1/07, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > No, keep as is. It is definitely not public domain, since it's > BSD-licensed and "patent-free" will open futile and unnecessary > discussions (on what it's supposed to mean) at the IETF. I was under the impression that Speex, like Vorbis and FLAC had its specification under the PD, and only the