similar to: performance speex on ARM

Well, all ARM9E cores use the v5TE architecture, which means Thumb and DSP-friendly instructions. Ettore Benedetti THALES COMMUNICATIONS B.V. Bestevaer 46, 1271 ZA Huizen The Netherlands Unclassified >>> tk <tunkeat@gmail.com> 10/15/05 7:15:20 AM >>> hi, i have searched through the archives but did not manage to find benchmarks of encoding/decoding speex on ARM

Hi I want to port speex to my pocket PC iPAQ1945 which has a Samsung processor 2410, an ARM9-based processor. I would like to write the specific optimized code for this chip. I had some experience at DSP chip and fixed-point coding but know nothing about embedded system and ARM. Could someone tell me some hint how to write optimized code for this pocket PC. If you can give me some links that will

Hi there, I've just started to work with the great speex encoder on ARM9-based embedded platform. This is my configuration: CPU: Cirrus Logic EP9315 @ 200 MHz (ARM920T) o.s.: Linux 2.6.9-rc2-ep93xx GCC: gcc version 3.3.3 (DENX ELDK 3.1 3.3.3-10) without MaverickCrunch support ogg library: 1.0 speex command line configuration: ./configure --enable-fixed-point --enable-arm4-asm The code is

We are in the process over the next week to implement the Fixed Point algorithms into a 200 MHz ARM9 CPU with MMU and I was wondering if you had any experience/knowledge with possible pitfalls. We are running Fixed Point compilation on PC based system (P4 processor) and are noticing that the audio gets "noisy" and then comes back to a more normal voice. Are you aware of any issues with

Hi, I'm writing a Speex-based IP interview tool. What's cool (and unique) about it is that since the goal is a perfect _recording_ of an interview, rather than a perfect real-time experience, I can afford to skimp on jitter buffer and redundant speech samples in favor of lower interactive latency ... and incorporate a speech sample retransmission protocol so that the receiver can ask

Hi all Speexers, I've done some optimization to current SVN fixed-point on ARM9E platform. If the RVDS simulator gives the MCPS(Million Cycle Per Second) value A, then actual MCPS on real CPU will be around 2*A. I don't know what cause the big gap between the simulator and real CPU. What do you think? BR, Lianghu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hello everyone, Can any body please tell me the compiler options to optimise the speex code for ARM TE architecture. Fixed point is enabled. It currently takes about 700ms to encode 5 sec worth of voice. I need to get it down to under 10ms. Is the option --enable-arm5te-asm supported? I am using speex 1.1.12 version. The configure.ac file does not seem to support --enable-arm5te-asm

I have been trying to find information and possible issues with running a cluster of dovecot server with different versions without any luck. We have an existing cluster with dovecot v1.1.10 and tried migrating to a new cluster with dovecot v2.0.12. We ran into some issues when we moved traffic to the new cluster and have been unable to reproduce it in our own testing. We may need to put real

ACE issued following PR: http://www.ace.nl/news/aces-cosy-compiler-framework-outperforms-llvm-arm9-processor Weird that they don't give any number and use ARM 9, do they mean cortex-a9 ?

diffed against http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/speex r9583 Index: libspeex/sb_celp.c =================================================================== --- libspeex/sb_celp.c (revision 9583) +++ libspeex/sb_celp.c (working copy) @@ -272,7 +272,6 @@ st->g0_mem=speex_alloc((QMF_ORDER)*sizeof(spx_word32_t)); st->g1_mem=speex_alloc((QMF_ORDER)*sizeof(spx_word32_t)); -

Hello, I am trying to build a speex library file for armv6 on intel MAC OS. I've also put -enable-arm5e-asm whether arm5e-asm works or not. ./configure -prefix=/Users/mijin/temp -disable-shared -enable-static - enable-fixed-point -enable-arm5e-asm This gives below errors. gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -I../include -I.. -g - O2 -fvisibility=hidden -MT cb_search.lo -MD

> I followed your advice on running the trivial case. The float version > started cancelling sounds out within a second. The fixed point > version also worked, but took a little longer before the effect was > noticeable. Since I now realized the fixed point version might need a > little more tweaking than the float version, I started modifying some > things and ended up with the

Hi, I am getting the following dump while trying to build for arm ./configure --prefix=/root/dump --host=arm-linux --with-gnu-ld --disable-static --enable-fixed-point --enable-arm-asm -enable-arm5e-asm configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --enable-arm-asm Type "make; make install" to compile and install Speex root at rony-ubuntu:~/speex# make make all-recursive make[1]:

Itay, >I am trying these things, but the main problem that has been bothering >me recently is that the fixed-point algorithm works "sometimes". Meaning >that sometimes it will work well, and other times it will not work at >all. > >I think I've found the source of the problem. The speex_alloc() >function, called by speex_echo_state_init(), calls calloc() and

Hello, I'll start a voip project, but i don't know which DSP is more indicate for the project. Any one can help me??? Which processor is more indicate for speex use ??? Thank you!! Rafael V. Gon?alves

Hi, I'm trying a quick port of this terrific codec to uClinux, a Linux-derivate for mmu-less systems. I'm particulary interested in the alloc()'s the library does, and it's stack usage. In nb_celp.c I found two lines of code doing memory allocation : nb_celp.c: st = (EncState*)speex_alloc(sizeof(EncState)+8000*sizeof(float)); nb_celp.c: st =

Hi I am currently trying to port speex v1.1.6 to a microcontroller with very limited memory (<64Kbyte RAM). what I found when initialising the encoder, a chunk of 32Kb was attempted to be alloced, which failed: src/nb_celp.c: void *nb_encoder_init(const SpeexMode *m) { /* snip */ st = (EncState*)speex_alloc(sizeof(EncState)+8000*sizeof(spx_sig_t)); /* snip */ } same goes for the

Hi, I am attempting to port the speex library to TI Davinci DM35x Family. My questions are: 1. What is the best ./configure option for it? Is it ARM5e / ARM4 ? when I tried these two the during the compiled a warning "I suppose you can have a [ARM4/ARM5E/Blackfin] that has float instructions?" 2. is there any available demos for the echo cancellation because I can get it

I was trying to using llvm to targeting ARMv5TE -- 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180314/b9dadc37/attachment.html>

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: maleout12may.wav Type: audio/wav Size: 95884 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20050524/57112d0c/maleout12may-0001.bin