similar to: Speex or iLBC?

Well, all ARM9E cores use the v5TE architecture, which means Thumb and DSP-friendly instructions. Ettore Benedetti THALES COMMUNICATIONS B.V. Bestevaer 46, 1271 ZA Huizen The Netherlands Unclassified >>> tk <tunkeat@gmail.com> 10/15/05 7:15:20 AM >>> hi, i have searched through the archives but did not manage to find benchmarks of encoding/decoding speex on ARM

Speaking of AEC (thought not quite on topic for this thread), Has anyone on this list played with the GIPS code that google just open-sourced? It looks like their AEC also has code to handle differential sample rates, though I haven't really evaluated it thoroughly. There is really a lot of code in the drop ? basically all of the GIPS DSP stuff (AGC, VAD, Denoise, echo canceller, etc),

Recently, we were notified that the mechanism included in our Asterisk source code releases to download and build support for the iLBC codec had stopped working correctly; a little investigation revealed that this occurred because of some changes on the ilbcfreeware.org website. These changes occurred as result of Google's acquisition of GIPS, who produced (and provided licenses for) the iLBC

Recently, we were notified that the mechanism included in our Asterisk source code releases to download and build support for the iLBC codec had stopped working correctly; a little investigation revealed that this occurred because of some changes on the ilbcfreeware.org website. These changes occurred as result of Google's acquisition of GIPS, who produced (and provided licenses for) the iLBC

i tried asterisk ilbc codec against kphone. when the call got connected, i started to immediately get these kind of message to the console: WARNING[14350]: File codec_ilbc.c, Line 141 (ilbctolin_framein): Huh? An ilbc frame that isn't a multiple of 52 bytes long from RTP (50)? WARNING[14350]: File codec_ilbc.c, Line 141 (ilbctolin_framein): Huh? An ilbc frame that isn't a multiple of

The Asterisk Development Team announces the release of Asterisk 1.8.7.0. This release is available for immediate download at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk/ The release of Asterisk 1.8.7.0 resolves several issues reported by the community and would have not been possible without your participation. Thank you! Please note that a significant numbers of changes and fixes have

The Asterisk Development Team announces the release of Asterisk 1.8.7.0. This release is available for immediate download at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk/ The release of Asterisk 1.8.7.0 resolves several issues reported by the community and would have not been possible without your participation. Thank you! Please note that a significant numbers of changes and fixes have

Hello everybody (I'm new here) I am looking for 2 specific functions. The first one is a variance formula that does not divide by n-1 (I don't want the unbiased formula, that's it). In case it does not exist, how do I modify the default function code? Yes, a workaround would be to multiply the result by n-1 and then divide it by n, but I'd like to use a separate function, if

> 1) May I know how Speex compared with GIPS codec? It seems that Google, > Yahoo, and Skype are licensing from GIPS. Are there any good benchmarking > or fair comparisons? I think these two emails sum up my opinion about Speex vs. iLBC: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2005-June/003410.html http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2005-September/003652.html > 2) In

Hi, We are planning to use Speex as the speech codec for a VoIP application. 1) May I know how Speex compared with GIPS codec? It seems that Google, Yahoo, and Skype are licensing from GIPS. Are there any good benchmarking or fair comparisons? 2) In particular, how is the jitter buffer control for Speex in response to intermitent poor connection hiccups? Is it robust enough to smooth out

Hi, > libclc: http://www.pcc.me.uk/~peter/libclc/ > pocl: https://launchpad.net/pocl > clover: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~steckdenis/clover/ I have pushed our implementation on GitHub: https://github.com/speziale-ettore/OpenCRun I have focused on desiging a modular system, because OpenCRun is intended to be used for research purpose -- not many people, no too much time, so clean

Le jeudi 22 septembre 2005 ? 08:19 +0800, Joe Anny a ?crit : > Thanks, Jean for the clarification. My first name's Jean-Marc, not Jean... > I look forward to delving into your tutorial codes. What we hope is to use > Speex as the primary voice codec. We also hope to get a quick start into > the programming aspects with buffer management, denoising, etc. taken care > of (or

On 06/22/2011 09:30 AM, Steve Kann wrote: > Speaking of AEC (thought not quite on topic for this thread), > > Has anyone on this list played with the GIPS code that google just > open-sourced? It looks like their AEC also has code to handle > differential sample rates, though I haven't really evaluated it > thoroughly. > > There is really a lot of code in the drop ?

Hi, I'm trying to determine the phase of irregularly sampled data. Is there any particular reason why both spec.pgram and spec.ls return phase<-NULL for vectors? Thank you. Lisandro xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx Lisandro Benedetti-Cecchi Associate Professor in Ecology Department of Biology - University of Pisa Via

Then why ONE sound card have different capture and playback rate? It must be ONE single physical clock generator which is used by both ADC and DAC in the sound card, isn't it? If you are a hardware engineer. Will you design two different physical clock for ADC and DAC seperately? What on earth causes this problem? Who knows its intrinsic real reason? Isn't there any other solutions? For

Hi, Maybe this question has already been answered but I could find its answer anywhere. >From here http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/spandsp/, I can see a new 0.0.3pre28 version of spandsp have been added in march. When you open this archive file, you can see a ChangeLog file but its content mentions last change date from may 2006 : "06.05.23 - 0.0.3 - Steve Underwood

Hi, > What compiler are you using to build with? I've made it default to clang with less looking around for llvm-gcc, so there may be an issue there. What is your configure line? What host are you trying to build on? First I have compiled llvm/clang compiled with "gcc (Gentoo 4.5.2 p1.1, pie-0.4.5) 4.5.2". Then I have installed llvm/clang. They are in the path: $ clang

Hello @ll, First a small sketch of my working environment. There is one PDC, W2000 server, which contains an Active directory, so basically all the windows users are maintained there. And the Linux/Unix accounts are stored on a NIS server. My goal would be the following 2 things. Firstly currently all the Linux/Unix servers are setup with individual winbind setups to make the windows users

On Sep 29, 2011, at 12:53 AM, Speziale Ettore wrote: > Hi, > >> What compiler are you using to build with? I've made it default to clang with less looking around for llvm-gcc, so there may be an issue there. What is your configure line? What host are you trying to build on? > > First I have compiled llvm/clang compiled with "gcc (Gentoo 4.5.2 p1.1, > pie-0.4.5)

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Speziale Ettore <speziale.ettore at gmail.com> wrote: > Currently I have implemented an OpenCL backend for i386 and X86_64 CPUs. > I have coded work-item stacks by hand because after some sintetic > benchmarks I have observed that both ucontext and setjmp/longjmp contain > some extra overheads. If you have not already seen it, you (and anyone