similar to: Speex granulepos definition

On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 08:07:50PM -0400, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Hi Ralph, > > What speexenc does (Speex itself does not know about Ogg) is that it gives > packet N the granulepos "N*frame_size - lookahead". In the case of narrowband, > the first frame would have granulepos "1*160 - 80", so 80. I can't say about > your example because Speex cannot

Hi Ralph, What speexenc does (Speex itself does not know about Ogg) is that it gives packet N the granulepos "N*frame_size - lookahead". In the case of narrowband, the first frame would have granulepos "1*160 - 80", so 80. I can't say about your example because Speex cannot encode a frame of one sample, which is a good thing becuse otherwise, the granulepos would be -79.

Hi all, something which came up recently in relation to the design of Kate's granulepos was whether or not the granulepos of successive Ogg pages is allowed to be the same, ie. whether or not granulepos must be strictly increasing. As this question is more generally about Ogg granulepos, how about we answer it first and then get back to the discussion of Kate's granulepos ... Here is

Hi, I'm the main author of Speex (http://speex.sourceforge.net), an open-source speech codec that uses Ogg for file storage. I'd like to have feedback on the way we store Speex data in Ogg files to make sure we do the right thing. The Speex documentation can be found at http://speex.sourceforge.net/manual/ but here's the part about Ogg: <p><p>Speex bit-streams can be

--- Ingo Ralf Blum <ingoralfblum@gmx.de> wrote: > > currently flac sets all granulepos members of the ogg pages to 0, > when > > embedding a FLAC stream into an Ogg file. Is it possible to change > this > > behaviour to use a more reasonable value, e.g. the bytes written so > far. > So > > when the first packets is 1000 bytes long it gets the granulepos

Hi, I'm wondering if the Dirac granulepos parsing in liboggz and display in the oggz tools is currently correct, as I'd like to do a release of these soon. A couple of days ago David Schleef mentioned there were some problems. David, is that currently true (ie. since David Flynn's recent updates to support Dirac), and if so could you please explain what the problems are, or point me

Hi While implementing OSS Ogg/Vorbis encoding and streaming using RTP/RTCP for both unicast and multicast, I have come across a few issues I need to clear out regarding the numbering of ogg_packets and their granulepos value. Below are the result for two different scenarios. <p>In the first scenario, ogg_packets are generated using a) vorbis_analysis_headerout() b) while

I've made a lot of progress on my lossless Vorbis editing project. I have a few more questions about granulepos issues I don't quite understand. granulepos is a property of Ogg pages, yet it is a field in the ogg_packet struct. When reading packets from an Ogg stream, the granulepos is set to -1 for all packets except the last packet in a page. From this I infer that - for encoding,

2008/11/26 David Flynn <davidf+nntp at woaf.net>: >>>> http://trac.annodex.net/changeset/3801 >>> >>> I'll test this shortly. > > Ok, i've tested muxing some audio and video together and that works fine. > woo. great, thanks :-) So the last remaining tool to check is oggz-chop. I at first assumed it would not work with Dirac's granulepos,

I've got a question about the granulepos in speex packets. >From the speex manual (http://www.speex.org/manual2/node7.html#SECTION00073000000000000000): >The third and subsequent packets each contain one or more (number found in header) Speex frames. These are identified with packetno starting from 2 and the granulepos is the number of the last sample encoded in that packet. In

2008/11/14 David Flynn <davidf+nntp at woaf.net>: > On 2008-11-13, Conrad Parker <conrad at metadecks.org> wrote: >> I'm wondering if the Dirac granulepos parsing in liboggz and display >> in the oggz tools is currently correct, as I'd like to do a release of >> these soon. > > I believe it is -- although if correct support in the rest of the >

On 2008-11-13, Conrad Parker <conrad at metadecks.org> wrote: > I'm wondering if the Dirac granulepos parsing in liboggz and display > in the oggz tools is currently correct, as I'd like to do a release of > these soon. I believe it is -- although if correct support in the rest of the liboggz tools is required, a little more work may need to happen. > Here's some

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 06:06:10PM +0900, Conrad Parker wrote: > A couple of days ago David Schleef mentioned there were some problems. > David, is that currently true (ie. since David Flynn's recent updates > to support Dirac), and if so could you please explain what the > problems are, or point me to a bugtracker where they are reported. eg. I mostly meant what you apparently

2008/11/21 David Flynn <davidf+nntp at woaf.net>: > On 2008-11-21, Conrad Parker <conrad at metadecks.org> wrote: >> 2008/11/15 David Flynn <davidf+nntp at woaf.net>: >>> On 2008-11-14, Conrad Parker <conrad at metadecks.org> wrote: >>>> It seems oggz chop, merge and sort will need some attention to deal >>>> with the Dirac

Hi all, I noticed the following Subversion commit today: r6719 | xiphmont | 2004-05-18 16:04:53 +1000 (Tue, 18 May 2004) | 11 lines Updated doc to reflect current proposal... Not as much a proposal at this point actually; this is the way I'm now implementing it. Although we're still in the 'RFC'/'look for horrible lossage' stage, this is close to being

So Thomas and I have been trying to hash out the seek and mux issues with grouped Ogg streams again, along with Conrad while he was here in Barcelona after Guadec. We'll put a longer proposal up later, but one question for the list: Thomas has suggested changing the theora granulepos so the first data packet the encoder spits out would be labeled 1/0 instead of 0/0, in "frame count of

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > Jahn, Ray (R.) a ?crit : > > > Dear Speex codec community: > > > > I am working on conversion of voice files. I could not figure out how to use speexdec.exe 1.2.3 in piped mode in order to avoid the creation of the potentially large intermediate *.wav or *.pcm files. Any

Hello, I'm just totally confused. In my theora streams encoded using ffmpeg2theora (but also when using my own encoder) I have packets with a granulepos of -1 so I can't identify the packet during a seeking operation correctly. I can also see those strange value when I just print the packet granulepos before sending it to the Theora decoder. I know why there are PAGES with granularpos of

The definition of granule position for an OggDirac elementary stream isn't the same as theora. Index: tools/oggz_tools.c =================================================================== --- tools/oggz_tools.c (revision 3759) +++ tools/oggz_tools.c (working copy) @@ -454,7 +454,15 @@ iframe = granulepos >> granuleshift; pframe = granulepos - (iframe << granuleshift);

Hi, I'm hacking on and off on oggmerge (from ogg-tools). I've added support for Theora, Speex, and Kate, as well as a few other fixes and changes. Now, I've got an issue relating to the ordering of pages as done by oggmerge, and the way oggz-validate tests for presentation time ordering. oggmerge, when deciding what timestamp to assign to a page, uses the previous page's