similar to: Fw: failure notice

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "Fw: failure notice"

2005 Aug 30
0
your message submission
Sorry, your message was not sent out to 'sap-r3-apo' because it appears not to have a Subject. If you believe you are receiving this message in error, resend your message with a Subject in it. For your information, the message is quoted below: Return-Path: <r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch> Received: from stat.math.ethz.ch ([203.78.110.26]) by with SMTP (Lyris ListManager WIN32
2007 Dec 19
0
VIRUS (Worm.Mydoom.M): IN UNA E-MAIL DA LEI INVIATA
VIRUS ALERT Il sistema di scansione ha rilevato un problema in una email presumibilmente inviata da Lei -> (<openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org>), per il seguente destinatario: -> agtd09000r at istruzione.it La consegna del messaggio non e' potuta avvenire Di seguito i riferimenti della e-Mail inviata: ------------------------- BEGIN HEADERS -----------------------------
2005 Sep 08
0
Message to Pietenpol-List Contained An Enclosure...
Hello, The message you posted to the List below contained file enclosure data and consequently was not posted to the List. You will notice that the enclosure is quite large and contains data that many mailer programs can't use. This enclosure also adds far too much 'useless' data to the already huge archive file. If you wish to share files such as photos of your project with the
2007 Mar 12
0
BOUNCE discussion@Softimage.COM: Non-member submission from [rsync@lists.samba.org]
>From Discussion-owner@paperboy.global.avidww.com Mon Mar 12 12:01:46 2007 Received: from softgate2.softimage.com (roundrobin.global.avidww.com [172.24.33.31]) by paperboy.global.avidww.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with SMTP id l2CH1k5I028475 for <discussion@softimage.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:01:46 -0500 Received: from psmtp.com
2004 Aug 06
0
Re: Please confirm your message
----- Original Message ----- From: <speex-dev@xiph.org> To: <luis.puchades@fh-duesseldorf.de> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 7:28 PM Subject: Please confirm your message <p>> Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org. > We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of > "". > > Please send a message to the following
2005 Jan 31
0
(no subject)
Sender: EMBROIDERED <tsl2u.c0shr@myweb.cn> Reply-To: meilung1931@yahoo.com.tw Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:08:13 +0800 X-Mailer:Dynamailer V 8.4 X-MimeOLE:Produced By Mircosoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Return-Path:meilung1931@yahoo.com.tw [r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch ] EMBROIDERED PATCHES CUSTOM POLICE , FIRE, SPORTS , CLUBS
2004 Aug 06
0
RE: Please confirm your message
> -----Original Message----- > From: speex-dev@xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev@xiph.org] > Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2003 11:26 PM > To: jk@pageshare.com > Subject: Please confirm your message > > > Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org. > We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of > "Using speex.". > > Please
2004 Aug 06
0
OT spammers was Re:what's happening here?
Ahah. I will end this here. I misread the newsgroup address on the original 'what's happening here', assuming it was for the vox group, which encourages idle rubbish. I hit reply, and believed I was mailing to this group. I apologise for wasting the bandwidth if icecast group members with such things. This is also why I did not hide my headers. If you like, mail me off-list and I
2004 Aug 06
2
OT spammers was Re:what's happening here?
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 11:08:08PM +0300, Gavin White wrote: > > Because the aren't many users here, the list is not monitored, > no rules... I guess IceCast as not as big as I thought... and > infested by bunch of lamers that like to take advantage of it > to advertise. > Since it is Sunday and I am in a good mood, I will presume from your languague and attitude that you
2004 Aug 06
2
OT spammers was Re:what's happening here?
I appreciate everyone's response. It's glad to see there are others out there... However, I still have seen a number of posts that have gone unanswered and some frustrated users (keyword: users) such as myself. Currently my issues are: Unable to start icecast from init.d (error: "You can run, but you can't hide" repeatedly output until it almost crashes my box) Unable to
2007 Sep 25
1
[LLVMdev] Real backend?
Thanks for reply, Tanya. Frankly speaking, I have no good idea. While googling, I could find the term, "real backend", in the articles so wondered how this was different from just backend used in LLVM. (E.g., Mr.Olofson mentioned "glSDL/backend (the "real" backend version; not yet in mainstream SDL releases)" in this article
2006 May 21
3
Re: High pitched whine with Speex
Changing from using floats to shorts did fix the high pitched tone problem. I'm having other problems but I'll look into it more first. SteveK wrote: > > On May 21, 2006, at 6:33 PM, Kevin Jenkins wrote: > >> When I just copy the microphone input buffer to the output buffer the >> sound plays OK. But if I encode and decode the buffer through Speex I >>
2010 Feb 27
2
Possible CPU Denial-Of-Service attack to dovecot IMAP.
Hi All! Some time ago, we received e-mail message, which makes our server CPU exhaustion attack. --- PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 26319 5751796 20 0 2868 1868 1484 R 99.2 0.1 22:04.77 imap --- It happens when I try open mail folder with this buggy message. Our setup: -- slackware 11.0, x86_32 -- linux 2.6.31.6 -- dovecot 1.2.10 -- mailbox(not
2007 Jan 25
1
X-UID gaps cause Dovecot/IMAP to hang
Hi, When the Dovecot 1.0.rc19 IMAP server encounters X-UID headers with gaps in them, it hangs indefinitely. I've attached a sample mailbox (in mbox format) which repeatably exhibits this behavior. The mbox contains only three messages with the following X-UIDs in order: 774, 785, 787. If I remove the X-UID headers from each message, Dovecot handles the mailbox without any problems. UW-IMAP
2004 Apr 12
1
OT appologies to list
[I'm sorry to trouble the list with this, but this is the only way I know to contact the person concerned] This message is for Stephen Karrington - it appears that you have over-agressive 'spam' filters and we can no longer email you. Please rectify this if we are to have meaningful conversation! The original message was received from Linus Surguy
2001 Mar 23
0
Re: Finding functions (eg. 'lag')
Many thanks to those who gave me a loaf, and others who taught me how to fish! Stuart > > > From: "Dr Stuart Leask" <stuart.leask at nottingham.ac.uk> > > To: "R-help" <r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch> > > Subject: [R] 'lag' in R? > > Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:46:18 -0000 > > X-Priority: 3 > > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
2000 Feb 29
0
Re: arima in ts.
> From: "Krassimir Krastev" <krastev at fas.harvard.edu> > To: "R-help" <r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch> > Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 11:56:49 -0500 > X-Priority: 3 (Normal) > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > Importance: Normal > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 > > Does anyone know of any comprehensive literature (like a
2000 Aug 18
0
BeOS (was Parallelism)
Sorry, majordomo mistriggered on the word 'which'. Sigh. Monty ------- Forwarded Message From: "Timothy Wayper" <timmy@r3.co.nz> To: <vorbis-dev@xiph.org> Subject: Re: [vorbis-dev] BeOS (was Parallelism) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 10:17:43 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority:
2001 Feb 27
1
Winamp plugin; http streaming
Sorry, had to foward this. Chris: Majordomo is triggering on the HTML in the message and rejecting it. A minor pain, but that alone catches half the spam that would otherwise show up on the list... ----- Forwarded message from owner-vorbis-dev@xiph.org ----- From: "Chris Moeller" <chris@kode54.net> To: <vorbis-dev@xiph.org> Subject: Winamp plugin; http streaming Date:
2006 Feb 11
1
Spammers on the mailing list?
In respose to my "when is update 3 coming out?" I received the following mail from brian.trudeau at eastek-intl.com offlist. Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is [04E-0B7CC3CC-3842]. Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject (including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue. Thank You, Support Staff