similar to: preprocessor performance (was Re: Memory leak in denoiser + a few questions)

OK, so the problem doesn't seem to be the VAD specifically. Can you tell me how much audio you had in the test? It may be that nothing's wrong and the code just isn't so fast that you can do 100 channels. Or maybe it just needs a bit of optimization... Jean-Marc Le mer 31/03/2004 à 10:03, Steve Kann a écrit : > Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > > >If you set the denoiser

All, in the light of erratum #573 I''m wondering if we need to tweak or conditionally suppress fsincos emulation. The question is whether there is any possibility for getting the emulator to hit this instruction on AMD (as no real mode emulation ought to be taking place there), i.e. whether there are places where emulation gets continued eagerly in anticipation of the need for emulation

Dear guys, what is the best way to implement a swap of floating point registers in X86? For the integer registers, I am using xchg. Is there a similar instruction for floating point? My function to insert swaps is like: void X86RegisterInfo::swapRegs( MachineBasicBlock & mbb, MachineBasicBlock::iterator mi, unsigned r1, unsigned r2, const TargetRegisterClass

On 7/3/07, Fernando Magno Quintao Pereira <fernando at cs.ucla.edu> wrote: > > what is the best way to implement a swap of floating point registers > in X86? For the integer registers, I am using xchg. Is there a similar > instruction for floating point? FXCH swaps stN with st0, but you'd have to use memory for arbitrary swaps I believe. I have no idea if it's the

Hello , I am compiling SPEC 2000 benchmarks with llvm .Got stuck with calculating "execution time" of all the .bc and native files. The log for nightly test itself gives execution times but I am passing the bytecode files to my pass which gives another bytecode file.I have to calculate execution time of such bytecode and native files as well.If i simply do this: time lli

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > I am compiling SPEC 2000 benchmarks with llvm .Got stuck with > calculating "execution time" of all the .bc and native files. > > The log for nightly test itself gives execution times but I am passing > the bytecode files to my pass which gives another bytecode file.I have > to calculate execution time of such bytecode and

Do anybody could compile app_conference on x86_64??? I tryied with two versions of app_conference and got the same problem on compiling: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared recompile with -fPIC app_conference.o: could not read symbols: Bad value" ENVIRONMENT:

Hello All, Thanks for the reply.I can generate the reports by compiling Spec through llvm, but that couldn't resolve my problem. I m trying to determine execution time for the bytecode and native files , which are obtained as a result of running my pass over the original bytecode .I am running these experiments on spec benchmark. In SPEC we have command line tools such as runspec where

Hi, I have a task to complete and I'm getting stuck. I can't find anything comparable in the documentation. The shortest explanation I can give is as follows: I need to use double-precision floating point values for floating-point multiplies. I'll not go into why: That would take the discussion away from the essential problem. E.g. Replace: fmuls %f20,%f21,%f8 with the

Hi I am having difficulty with eigen() on R-devel_2006-01-05.tar.gz Specifically, in R-2.2.0 I get expected behaviour: > eigen(matrix(1:100,10,10),FALSE,TRUE)$values [1] 5.208398e+02+0.000000e+00i -1.583980e+01+0.000000e+00i [3] -4.805412e-15+0.000000e+00i 1.347691e-15+4.487511e-15i [5] 1.347691e-15-4.487511e-15i -4.269863e-16+0.000000e+00i [7] 1.364748e-16+0.000000e+00i

I have been doing some playing with the patterns that define complex instructions, and I saw a behavior that doesn't look right. I think its a bug in the PPC backend. The 32-bit PPC .td file defines a pattern for the fnmsubs instruction like this: def : Pat<(fsub F4RC:$B, (fmul F4RC:$A, F4RC:$C)), (FNMSUBS F4RC:$A, F4RC:$C, F4RC:$B)>,

Some wheird problem, Target/X86 builds okay now. But there seems to be another problem with the Cygwin build :- make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/build/llvm/lib/Target/SparcV9/ModuloScheduling' llvm[4]: Compiling ModuloSchedulingSuperBlock.cpp for Debug build /usr/src/llvm/lib/Target/SparcV9/ModuloScheduling/ModuloSchedulingSuperBlock.cpp : In member function `virtual bool

Hello, I am fitting a coxph model with factors. I am running into problems when using 'survfit'. I am unsure how R is treating the factors when I fit, say: > DATA<-data.frame(time.sec,done,f.pom=factor(f.pom),po,vo) > final<-coxph(Surv(time.sec,done)~f.pom*vo+po,data=DATA) > final.surv<-survfit((final), individual=T,conf.type="log-log")

Dear experts, I'm attempting to solve a constrained optimization problem using the Rdonlp2 package. I created a Lagrange function (L=f(x)-lambda(g(x)-c)), where x is a vector of 16 parameters. This is what I'm using as objective function in the code below. In addition, I set bounds on these parameters (par.u and par.l). When I run the code, I get the error message shown below. Any idea

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >>Reverberation suppression? >> >> > >Basically, it means that if you are in a room with lots of echo (long >decay), I can reduce it a bit. > > > >>I guess this would help reduce local source echoes? I've never >>_noticed_ that to be a problem in my use, but I would imagine that >>using a notebook's

Dear all,? I am really sorry for this. I have attached the script and a .csv file with an example.? Hope this will help. Many thanks,Maria ???? 11:53 ?.?. ???????, 20 ????????? 2017, ?/? Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> ??????: On 20/11/2017 6:38 AM, Maria Lathouri via R-help wrote: >? Dear all > I know that it is a very simple question but it seems that I cannot

Dear all I know that it is a very simple question but it seems that I cannot change the colour in the bars. I have the following dataframe:? A ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? B ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? C ? ? ? ? ? D ? ? ? ?? E ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? F ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? G ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?0.0.24 ? ? ? ?? 152460 ? ? ? ? 474 ? ? ? 5.5 ? ? ?? 612000 ? ? ? ? ? 59061000 ? ? ? 1540313 and here is the script:

2013/10/19 Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com>: > On 19 October 2013 06:01, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang at gmail.com> wrote: >> I found that access llvm-mc from clang driver is impossible, and I >> want to use llvm-mc to compile assembly files, how to do that? > > Try "clang -integrated-as -c test.s" Thank you very much, I use the

On 20/11/2017 6:38 AM, Maria Lathouri via R-help wrote: > Dear all > I know that it is a very simple question but it seems that I cannot change the colour in the bars. > I have the following dataframe: > A ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? B ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? C ? ? ? ? ? D ? ? ? ?? E ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? F ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? G ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?0.0.24 ? ? ? ?? 152460 ? ? ? ? 474 ? ? ? 5.5 ? ? ?? 612000 ? ?

Hi Bob, are these performance regressions real? They look pretty serious. Ciao, Duncan. On 10/12/11 09:40, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > > bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results > > URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/332/ > Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4 > Name curlew.apple.com > > Run ID Order Start Time End Time >