similar to: narrowband embedded in wideband

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "narrowband embedded in wideband"

2004 Aug 06
1
narrowband embedded in wideband
It looks like I'll need to go further into the guts of speex to do this. I do, however, see some lines in nb_celp.c/nb_decode() that look interesting. I guess I'll play with it. I doubt that it will be terribly clean, though. Jean-Marc: Take a look at line 1195 in nb_celp.c (CVS). It reads "speex_warning ("More than to wideband layers found: corrupted
2008 Feb 12
2
Determine number of 20ms frames in packet - without decoding
Hi Alexander, > Here is first attempt. I'm sending it here for review - am I understand > you correctly? If general approach is correct, I'll change code to use > modes from modes.c. I haven't tested, but it looks sane. Just a few comments: - printf("\tERROR not enough bits left after wb\n"); this is actually now an error. It just means you got to the end of the
2004 Aug 06
2
vbr and music
I know speex is not supposed to do a great job compressing music, but I've noticed that the new VBR code chokes completely when you try to compress horns. I've placed a particularly offensive example up at http://www.utdallas.edu/~matthias/ . Take a look at a-16m*{ogg,spx}. a.ogg is the first minute of an ogg created from the source media (in 44khz stereo). The rest have been mixed down
2004 Aug 06
1
cosmetic problems with speex encoder in rc3
Take a look at this: peexenc --vbr -V --quality 4 audiodump.wav a.spx Encoding 32000 Hz audio using ultra-wideband (sub-band CELP) mode (stereo) Bitrate is use: 22400 bps (average -1268444817 bps) I'll take a look at what the problem is later today or tomorrow, but if anyone beats me to the bug, let me know before I spend too much cscope time playing with it. Regards, Matthias --
2009 May 30
0
something wrong with narrowband and ultra-wideband?
I downloaded speex-1.2beta3-win32 binaries, and used the speexenc.exe and speexdec to process the file male.wav download from http://speex.org/samples I used both the narrowband and ultra-wideband mode: >speexenc -n --quality 3 male.wav n3.spx Encoding 8000 Hz audio using narrowband mode (mono) >speexdec n3.spx n3.wav Decoding 8000 Hz audio using narrowband mode (mono) Encoded with Speex
2005 Oct 25
2
Noisy sound quality with Blackfin in WB-mode
Hello all, I'm testing the Speex codec for my diploma thesis on a BF-533 Blackfin under uCLinux (2005R3 RC3 release). I successfully compiled the Speex (1.1.11-svn) and I can encode/decode wav-files on my STAMP-board using the speexenc/speexdec sample apps. But I encountered that the decoded file sounds strange/noisy, when compiling with "--enable-blackfin-asm" +
2005 Aug 26
0
Segmentation fault in narrowband and wideband mode
Hello, playing a little around with speexenc/speexdec, I discovered that if I pass the "-n" or "-w" command line option to speexenc (version 1.1.10), I get a segmentation fault. Looking closely at the code, I found that the line: fprintf (stderr, "Warning: Trying to encode in %s at %d Hz. I'll do it but I suggest you try ultra-wideband instead\n",
2009 Dec 15
2
Regression in wideband encoding quality between b1 and rc1
Hello, To start with, thanks a lot for making such a great voice codec available! Having recently upgrading to speex rc1, It occurred to us that there seems to have been a regression in the quality of encoding since version beta1. We are compressing some 22khz wave files in wb mode with maximum quality / complexity in VBR, and the result was really great with speex beta1. With rc1 (or beta3),
2004 Aug 06
1
Speex, what container?
But using the ACM codec I just need to put the speex content into the wave file data chunk and then windows will play it? Miguel Gomes -----Mensagem original----- De: owner-speex-dev@xiph.org em nome de Matthias Granberry Enviada: qui 04-03-2004 11:53 Para: speex-dev@xiph.org Cc: Assunto: Re: [speex-dev] Speex, what container?
2004 Aug 06
2
Speex 1.0.1 is out
Hi everyone, I just released Speex version 1.0.1 with a major bugfix to the wideband mode. It's highly recommended for people using wideband Speex to upgrade. Also, since the old encoder and decoder had the bug, you may notice that files encoded with 1.0 have a lower quality when decoded with 1.0.1. For that reason, re-encoding might be a good idea. Note that narrowband is not affected by
2003 Jun 30
0
outgoing calls with packet8 and dta310 problems
I'm trying to get asterisk working w/ packet8 (incoming and outgoing) and a dta310 so I can have more control over voicemail. I've looked at the data stream coming from the dta310 and from packet8, but I haven't managed to get the phone to actually place invites through asterisk. On the asterisk end with chan_oss.so, I can make it dial and I hear ringing and the first second of
2004 Aug 06
4
Speex 1.0 RC3 is out
Hi, Just to let you know that Speex 1.0 RC3 is out. It should be the last RC until 1.0 is released (tentative release date is March 16th). Please give RC3 a try and report bugs so they can be fixed before 1.0. As usual, download from http://www.speex.org/download.html Jean-Marc -- Jean-Marc Valin, M.Sc.A. LABORIUS (http://www.gel.usherb.ca/laborius) Université de Sherbrooke, Québec,
2004 Aug 06
2
quality -> bitrate
Use the -V option when encoding and you should get bitrates. "Daniel Vogel" <vogel@epicgames.com> writes: > Could someone post a mapping of quality to bitrate or provide me with a link > where to find this information? > > Thanks, > > -- Daniel, Epic Games Inc. > > --- >8 ---- > List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ > Ogg project homepage:
2004 Aug 06
3
Chopping off the wideband?
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 06:09:43PM -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Le mar 18/02/2003 ? 17:38, John Hayes a ?crit : > > If I encode something in ultra-wideband, can I decode it in wideband by > > chopping off bytes in every frame? > > All you have to do is use the --force-wb switch with speexdec. It will > decode as if the file were wideband, ignoring the ultra-wideband
2004 Aug 06
4
Chopping off the wideband?
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 09:06:16PM -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > BTW, when you have something working and stable, I could include it in > the main Speex distribution. Hmmm, define working and stable :) <braindump topic="speexcat"> It began as a merge between speexdec and speexenc from 1.0beta3, with the encoding/decoding removed, and simply piped in and out from ogg
2009 Feb 13
1
"More than two wideband layers found. The stream is corrupted." problem
Dear Speex developers, I am currently experimenting with Speex on Symbian smartphones. I have compiled the Speex library, and I am now using it in the following way: 1. Record 320-byte buffers of data in PCM16 format, 8000 Hz sampling rate. 2. Feed the resulting buffer to an instance of a narrowband Speex encoder. 3. Send the encoded data over RTP. 4. Upon receiving on the other side, feed the
2010 Jan 14
2
Fwd: Re: Fixed Point on wideband-mode: Single Frame loss on 2000 Hz sine causes "freak off"
Hi Jean-Marc, yes, problem exists in narrowband-mode, too. I already twiddled with max_gain, but did not have real success. I changed line 337 of ltp.c (function pitch_gain_search_3tap_vq) if (sum>best_sum && gain_sum<=max_gain) { to if (sum>best_sum && gain_sum<max_gain) { -- that stabilizes speex for 2000 Hz and 2200 Hz input on quality setting 7 (23800
2006 Mar 14
1
Encoding mode
Hello, In the internet draft describing the SDP parameters for speex I find this: mode: Speex encoding mode. Can be {1,2,3,4,5,6,any} defaults to 3 in narrowband, 6 in wide and ultra-wide. In the documentation I can only find the following request: SPEEX_SET_MODE There is no description though what this request does. I think the mode somehow maps to the bitrate, but I
2006 May 10
2
frame size
Hi, Can someone please tell me how should I go about changing the frame size which is hardcoded to 160 for NB and WB and 320 for UWB. For NB speech(8KHz) the framesize of 160 is 20ms frame but for WB and UWB its 10ms. What are the parameters being affected by simply changing the framesize and sub-frame size in "modes.c" How to change the buffer size and how its affected. can we have a
2004 Aug 06
4
Decoding .spx with 1.0 on ppc produces noise!
Hi, I got my hands on the LCA 2003 CD today and I tried to listen to it on my powerbook running Linux. Instead of getting speech, I got an earfull of noise! Attempting the same experiment on an i386 with the same CD produced understandable speech. It seems that the output routine in speexdec converts the output data to little endian short format, which is incorrect on the ppc architecture. The