similar to: Troubleshooting RSYNC

Hi raf, I was not aware the network maps were "user experience". Thanks for your tips. I have tried everything I can come up with, but cannot get it to work. I figured out another solution, but thank you very much for your help. Best, Leon On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 9:23 PM raf via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Leon Vanderploeg via rsync wrote: > > >

Hi, sorry for my insistence but this is a big problem for me..my steps for remove card are ok ? Thanks. ------ Salvatore. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sasa" <sasa at shoponweb.it> To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 4:25 PM Subject: [asterisk-users] Remove a TDM Card > Hi, I would like remove a Digium TDM2400P from

grrr. /home/mrm $ gdb /usr/local/bin/doveadm GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for

Hi All, I am trying to use llvm compiler to translate a non-trivial piece of code from C++ to C. I need this because I need to use part of the code as lib for another project that is strictly C. I am working under MSWin and I have choice to use either BCC or MSVC. After a good deal of tries I found out I had to somewhat massage llc -march=c output to make it *almost* compilable. I have one

Hi all, Ok, since 3.1 still isn't in stable, I'm curious if I can just find the equivalent of: rsync -avHP --delete --exclude-from '/home/user/excludes.txt' /mnt/example.com/ /var/vmail/example.com/ But that will ignore differences in permissions - ie, won't recopy everything, just because the permissions on the source are different from the permissions on the target...

Greetings, I have written a C program that runs on Windows servers and does overhead and reporting for backup administration. The program calls rsync for the actual data copy function. It copies data from a remote system to a local drive and that works fine. However, I have recently made changes to copy the data to a mapped drive on a NAS device instead of the local drive. The changes work

Hello Asterisk users, Can someone thwack me with a clue stick please? I am following the Asterisk TFOT book Dial() example trying to get the limit and announcements to work as per below. These settings seem to have no effect. There are no warning messages after 4 minutes or every 30 secs thereafter and the call lasts longer than 5 minutes. gunner*CLI> show dialplan [ Context

Is a normal functionality? when I do #dahdi_cfg -vvvvvv In my Asterisk console shows this.... [Jul 24 13:39:08] NOTICE[30263]: chan_dahdi.c:9461 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 If I do this a lot of times...then [Jul 24 13:39:20] NOTICE[30263]: chan_dahdi.c:9461 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 [Jul 24

What's your dd command? Are you sure you are writing to the raw disk and not inside a partition? On 29/01/2020 16:30, Jerry Geis wrote: > Well after a closer look - Seems like the OLD 8.0 iso image is still on the > USB. Not the new 8.1 > > I have tried to redo the dd command to copy the 8.1 iso - I get no errors - > but it still comes up with the 8.0 > I then tried to

I did the dd if=CentOS-8.1.1911-x86_64-dvd1.iso of=/dev/sdd to a 16G USB disk then tried to use it on an install. The installer said invalid install media. Any way to verify if the "write" to disk was good ? I got no errors on the dd. I did re-download the iso and did a diff and there was no diff. So I think my iso is OK. Jerry

Hi, Some weird problem (or I'm too sleepy) happens with a tdm04B revision G (4fxo) Steps: modprobe zaptel modprobe wctdm ztcfg -vv /etc/zaptel.conf fxsls=1-4 # TDM04B defaultzone=us loadzone=us /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf signalling=fxs_ls group=1 context=incoming channel => 1-4 modprobe zaptel and wctdm load fine, however ztcfg -vv shows: 0 channels configured Im using centos 4.4 with

I have a large disk full of data that I'd like to upgrade to SW RAID 1 with a minimum of downtime. Taking it offline for a day or more to rsync all the files over is a non-starter. Since I've mounted SW RAID1 drives directly with "mount -t ext3 /dev/sdX" it would seem possible to flip the process around, perhaps change the partition type with fdisk or parted, and remount as

doveadm -D -vvvvvv index \#ARCHIVE/\* garners the below for ALL mailboxes in the namespace: doveadm(ler): Error: Mailbox #ARCHIVE/2013/04/clamav-rules: Status lookup failed: Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information. [2016-11-01 13:25:21] doveadm(ler): Error: lucene: Failed to sync mailbox INBOX: Mailbox isn't selectable doveadm(ler): Error: Mailbox

Hi, In 3.0.4, encountered a problem with dot-dir path (e.g. , foo/./bar) inside a -files-from file when the root of the transfer isn't in the current directory. This was fixed in 3.05 (well, partially). 3.0.5 bug fixes release info: - Fixed the use of a dot-dir path (e.g. foo/./bar) inside a --files-from file when the root of the transfer isn't the current directory.

Leon Vanderploeg via rsync wrote: > Greetings, > > I have written a C program that runs on Windows servers and does overhead > and reporting for backup administration. The program calls rsync for the > actual data copy function. It copies data from a remote system to a local > drive and that works fine. However, I have recently made changes to copy > the data to a mapped

clamav-rules is NOT a directory, nor are any of the others: thebighonker.lerctr.org ~/MAILARCHIVE $ cd 2016/10 thebighonker.lerctr.org ~/MAILARCHIVE/2016/10 $ ls -l total 72106 -rw-r--r-- 1 ler ler 440461 Nov 1 00:05 Amplify_Mail -rw-r--r-- 1 ler ler 104102478 Nov 1 14:53 INBOX drwxr-xr-x 3 ler ler 4 Nov 1 00:05 SA -rw-r--r-- 1 ler ler 21083767 Nov 1 00:05 SENT

Greetings, I am using cygwin/rsync to backup windows data to a linux server. I recently upgraded an implementation of rsync from 2.6.8 to 3.0.4 and have encountered a problem. In the previous version of rsync a /./ in the from file would cause the previous path information to be dropped for the destination directory. In 3.0.4, it appears the . is being translated into the current (working)

Hello, I am using rsync to do daily backups on another filesystem. Whenever a folder has been renamed or moved on the source, rsync will delete all the recursive files on the destination filesystem, and then recopy them to the newly named/moved folder. This can take a long time. Is there a way to get rsync to simply re-link the files instead? It looked like maybe the -H option might, but I am

How do I minimize the amount of disk activity? I'm copying a large number of files: rsync -av -W /from/here/. /to/here/. I'm using rsync because I need the incremental updates and other features. Otherwise, I'd use tar piped to tar or some similar technique. Note: Both the source and destination are "local". Well, not really. The source is a network-mounted partition

According to man page, the only way it can return EINVAL (22) is either bad filter, or bad timeout. I can't see how the filter would be bad, so I'm guessing ts must be bad. Unfortunately I forgot to ask for it, so I am going to have to ask you run it again and run p ts if that's valid, then the only thing that can be bad if the file descriptor 23. Aki > On October 23, 2016 at