similar to: [Bug 12570] New: Problems with --checksum --existing

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10379 Summary: rsync metadata files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com QAContact:

My understanding is that if I "zfs set checksum=<different>" to change the algorithm that this will change the checksum algorithm for all FUTURE data blocks written, but does not in any way change the checksum for previously written data blocks. I need to corroborate this understanding. Could someone please point me to a document that states this? I have searched and searched

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9812 Summary: Lookahead file-list loading and comparison Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10051 Summary: Improved long file-name handling Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com QAContact:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14371 Bug ID: 14371 Summary: Combined Exclude & Protect Filter Type Product: rsync Version: 3.2.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayne at opencoder.net

> On 27 Jan 2016, at 21:55, Axel Luttgens <axel.luttgens at skynet.be> wrote: > > Hello Haravikk, > > Perhaps could you try to devise an exception based on one (or more) "remote" section(s), as in: > > remote ip.of.webmail.server { > ssl_verify_client_cert = no > [other settings, if needed] > } > > But I guess you would need to combine

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10579 Summary: --xattr internal abbrev error Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: samba at haravikk.com

> Hello, > > FYI. This problem looks similar to the problem I reported in Februari > http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2013-February/019517.html > > Kind regards, > Wim. > > On 06/28/2013 10:02 AM, Matt Fleming wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Jun, at 08:13:03AM, N?meth P?ter wrote: > >> Hi guys! > >> I tried to boot memtest86+ v4.2 (renamed memtest.bin to

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9814 Summary: --cache parameter for storing recent file data Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com

On 02 Feb 2016, at 13:09, Haravikk <dovecot at haravikk.me> wrote: > > So I still haven?t found a way to require client certificates only for port 993/IMAPS while leaving unencrypted IMAP open for local, trusted, services. > > Is there really no way to do this? I just found out how to do the same thing for postfix (turns out it?s fairly easy, just a matter of adding the

Okay, I'd like to start first by saying, awesome work on this project! It's been a few years since I last tracked the progress of WINE on OS X, and it's come on leaps and bounds as I can run most everything I've thrown at it so far, with only minor issues here and there, which is a damned sight better than VMWare Fusion or Parallels which have compatibility issues everywhere,

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9864 Summary: Allow permanent compression of destination files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com

I?m using dovecot to provide encrypted IMAP e-mail support for remote clients and it?s working great. However, I also need to set up a webmail front-end (Roundcube), which I?m hoping to have use unencrypted IMAP on port 143 (as only port 993 is available externally). The problem I?m running into is that I want to require client certificate authentication on port 993, but dovecot is apparently

So I?m looking at setting up some house-keeping for my dovecot mailboxes, specifically deleting messages in trash, spam etc., by deleting Seen messages older than X days. In order to protect against the edge case of a user reading a message right before the deletion task however I?d like to do something like the following: doveadm expunge -A OLD SEEN BEFORE 7d MAILBOX Trash doveadm flags -A

i'm thinking about albums like "dark side of the moon" and also live bands (especially live-pa) and DJs where there's a continuous flow from one song to the next... i could use a MKV file with vorbis or mp3 and include a chapter listing [with named chapters], that would allow listening to the whole thing with no skipping between songs. at the same time, a listener can skip

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10507 Summary: Structured Output (for Simpler Parsing) Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10601 Summary: Retry Delay for Vanished Files/Directories Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: samba at haravikk.com

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10380 Summary: Non-Nested Folder Optimisation Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com

On 06/28/2013 04:25 AM, Ady wrote: > > @Wim and @All, > FWIW, in 2013-February there still were other additional issues with > some kernels, including memory testers, so having a problem to boot > memtest(86|86+|other) might or might not be related to the > "PXE-stack-smasher" bug. > > For example, in v.4.06, the cfg entry could be: > LINUX memtest >

When --checksum is used they're calculated in both ends to see if the file should be transfered. This is of course not necessary if the file doesn't exist in the destination. However, the checksum is still calculated by the sender, which is often a very large overhead. Would it be possible to avoid it?