similar to: [Bug 12367] New: temporary lines in --progress output are not cleared

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11635 Bug ID: 11635 Summary: make fails for out-of-tree build Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: andrey.gursky

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11588 Bug ID: 11588 Summary: missing option: preallocate for all files except for sparse Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12305 Bug ID: 12305 Summary: --fallocate and --sparse works wrong Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13044 Bug ID: 13044 Summary: On macOS 10.12.6 with the new Xcode 9, `make check` is full of failures Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: x86 OS: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P5 Component: core

I installed MSWord 2000 with Wine1.2 several weeks ago with no problem; now something has been "upgraded" in Ubuntu so that I cannot install MSWord 2000 anymore on another computer; I get an error message about a security bit being "set". I also tried Wine1.3 Beta, with similar results. Is there any work-around for this? Thank you, krt

rsync-2.6.6 manpage says: --delete [...] This option has no effect unless directory recursion is enabled. True. In fact, I noted that --delete doesn't delete anything if --dirs is used rather than --recursive. Is there any reason for --delete not to delete when used with --dirs? Is there a way to get rsync to actually delete files on the receiving end when using

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11521 Bug ID: 11521 Summary: rsync does not use high-resolution timestamps to determine file differences Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core

On Wed 20 Jan 2016, Andrey Gursky wrote: > > I was just about to implement the same, since nanoseconds are taken > into account when transferring, thus making it obvious not to ignore Really? I thought the protocol only transmits seconds. Paul

Hi all, I've tried to plot a vector which has two peaks in the density. This link shows the figure. http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dcvdrfrh_1dk9r2rc7 The red line is normal curve and green line is gamma curve. Notice that red line can correctly fit the histogram that has two peaks (i.e. red curve also has two peaks). But the gamma curve there only has one curve. Is there a way I can

I wrote on Fri, 02 Jan 2015 16:02:27 +0100: > --- a/generator.c 2014-06-14 01:05:08.000000000 +0200 > +++ b/generator.c 2015-01-02 15:50:30.000000000 +0100 > @@ -588,7 +588,14 @@ > if (ignore_times) > return 0; > - return cmp_time(st->st_mtime, file->modtime) == 0; > + return cmp_time(st->st_mtime, file->modtime) ==

Unless you suppress all output with the -q option, rsync will always print an initial "building/receiving file list ... done" line. In my opinion, this is a bit superfluous. When I want to see a progress indication, I can use the --progress option. Another issue is the 3-line transfer speed and speedup factor report at the end. So every rsync invocation produces at least four lines of

Hi, I'm trying to help my friend run this Japanese game on Mac OSX. The installation process was as instructed in the AppDB, but when the Schoolmate.exe is clicked, the following message pops up: "Buffer overrun detected! Program: C:\illusion\Schoolmate\SchoolMate.exe A buffer overrun has been detected which as corrupted the program's internal state. The program cannot safely

... > Getting the approval for a relicensing I think the contributions to > rsync have to be analyzed in detail to approach a reasonable number of > contributors. > > I experienced that finding a responsible person that is willing to > discuss such a case in an organization that contributed source code is > nearly impossible. > > Looking at the source code (my short

Hi, I am having stability problems setting up dovecot to authenticate virtual users against Active Directory on Win2k3. If the correct userid and password are used, everything works fine, see first logfile snippet below. If an unknown userid is used, again everything works fine. If I try logging in with a valid userid but get the password wrong, that connection is rejected (see second logfile

I am trying to change my subscription option to a daily digest but am unable to log in to change my options.... -- Ed Gurski (ed at gurski.com) Registered Linux User 458454

in one of my apps i am currently using redcloth to use textile formatting on my content. i am wanting to add reporting to the system, but the content that prints out doesn''t have the formatting obviously that i can have with html. what''s a good solution for some kind of formatting where i can use it on both web and print? i''m using pdf/writer right now and i think

I am wondering if anyone has any procedural documentation for installing and using Rails from the standalone packages rather then via ''gem install''. It seems there should be some steps outside of simply unpacking the tar ball in order to integate it with your Ruby installation. Seems every bit of installation documentation I can find has ''gem install

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #25 from Andrey Gursky <andrey.gursky at e-mail.ua> --- On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 22:20:16 +0000 samba-bugs at samba.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 > > --- Comment #23 from dajoker at gmail.com --- > Looking for this capability prior to entering it as an enhancement request > myself, I found

Hello All, The link to the binary & installation instructions (tar.gz binary not an ipk I'm afraid) is as follows: http://students.bath.ac.uk/enpsgp/Zaurus/#R It eventually dawned on me that the WORDS_BIGENDIAN define (or lack thereof) was causing the problems (after testing ieee NaN compliance that is). When cross-compiling it's probably fair enough that the configure script

Hi Andrey, 2016-01-23 4:02 GMT+01:00 Andrey Gursky <andrey.gursky at e-mail.ua>: ... > If they don't want to bother with just discussing, why would they take a > big effort to claim? And your proposition for LGPL is not very > different in opposite to BSD or public domain. Yes, I agree. The risk of having a future lawsuit against my project would be pretty small if I