similar to: Priority when merging source directories

I have found an unwanted feature of rsync 2.5.5. It has to do with soft links and the --delete option in archive mode. The following shows how to reproduce the error. Provide a soft link that refers to a parent directory. %> /bin/ls -lR /tmp/src /tmp/src: total 16 16 drwxrwxr-x 2 wke sys_admin 239 Sep 17 16:18 dir1/ /tmp/src/dir1: total 32 16 lrwxrwxrwx 1 wke

Hallo I thought that I need to use `--delete' option for that, but it looks like not. Problem explanation: prompt# ls /tmp/dir1/ /tmp/dir2/ /tmp/dir1/: fil1.txt /tmp/dir2/: fil1.txt fil2.txt prompt# rsync --delete /tmp/dir1/* /tmp/dir2/ prompt# ls /tmp/dir1/ /tmp/dir2/ /tmp/dir1/: fil1.txt /tmp/dir2/: fil1.txt fil2.txt # fil2.txt still exists My question is,

Hi, I'm running rsync-3.0.4 on my UNIX system. I've just updated from rsync-2.6.9. I'm facing a general problem with the execution of files during a transfer process. The situation: 2 Directories (dir1 and dir2) on one machine with a some files in dir1 which shall be translated to dir2. rsync does not correctly recognize dir1 and dir2 as directories. It tries to transfer dir1 as a

Hi, I'm using the following command to move files from a to b: rsync -avvvv --remove-source-files --ignore-existing /path/to/dir1/ /path/to/dir2 >> logfile dir2 isn't empty so I only move files from dir1 to dir2 that don't exist already. Every so often rsync stops in the middle and doesn't continue with the result that I have to kill it. The last time it happened, rsync had

Hello, I would like to have a full repository, say, holding files full/a.txt (version 1) full/b.txt (version 1) full/c.txt (version 1) and a repository of updates, for example new/b.txt (version 2 - newer) Then, I would like to call rsync [flags] new/ full/ destination to get destination/a.txt (v.1) destination/b.txt (v.2) destination/c.txt (v.1) This simple case works

Is there a way to know where is the source, so as to make a source call inside another source smarter? As an example: file1.R is in directory /files/dir1/ file2.R is in directory /files/dir1/dir2/ In file1.R, there is this line: source("dir2/file2.R") So, if I setwd to /files/dir1/, and then I call source("file1.R"), it will run correctly. However, if I setwd to /files,

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7922 Summary: rsync not using delta blocking when the source file different to partial file. Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

I have noticed that the contents of per-directory .cvsignore files apply outside their subtrees when using --cvs-exclude in rsync 2.6.0. In the results below, notice how dir1/.cvsignore is applying to a file in dir2. There is no ~/.cvsignore, and the CVSIGNORE variable is unset. % ls -AFR .: dir1/ dir2/ ./dir1: .cvsignore file1 ./dir2: file2.foo % cat dir1/.cvsignore *.foo % /usr/bin/rsync

On 24 Nov 2003, Dirk Pape <pape@inf.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > Dear Martin Pool, > > I tried to ask via the rsync-mailing list but never got an answer. So I > contact you directly. > > I refer to the rsync syntax > > rsync [OPTION]... SRC [SRC]... DEST > > with more than one SRC, which is mentioned in the man-pages. > We use this form to "overlay"

Hello, I'm totally new to this list, so I hope I don't break all the rules. :) I've looked through the archives (and google), and I really can't find the answer to my question. I'm trying out the 'detect-renamed'-patch, and I've encountered some odd behavior. I've applied the patch to both rsync-2.6.9 and rsync-3.0.0pre7, and it's the same behavior.

Good morning all, We are moving our web server from novell to unix (solaris) and will be using samba to allow users to edit web pages. Our samba instance authenticates using ADS and the users do not necessarily have accounts on the server itself. We are attempting to allow users to map a single samba share but only see the directories they have read access to (see configuration below). Any

Does rsync -aAXv /dir1 /dir2, where dir2 is a mounted FAT formatted SD card, and then: rsync -aAXv /dir2 /dir1, to restore the files in dir1 from the FAT formatted SD card, restore the ACL and owner/permissions of the files and directories in dir1? Thanks, John -- John Conover, conover at rahul.net, http://www.johncon.com/

When I do rsync -av --backup --backup-dir=/dir1/dir2/Backup \ /dir1/dir2/dir3 machine:/dir1/dir2/dir3 I get /dir1/dir2/Backup/dir3/... /Backup/dir3/dir4/... i.e. the tree under 'dir3' (my source tree) gets created under .../Backup. This is fine. But when I do the same thing with a single file like rsync -av --backup --backup-dir=/dir1/dir2/Backup \ /dir1/dir2/file

I want to send a subset of directories sepcified in "include" arguments to a client, but I am creating all the peer and parent directories as well, although they are empty - here is basically what I'm doing. assuming I have /staging/upgrade/dir1, /staging/upgrade/dir2 and /staging/upgrade/dir3 on the source tree. --include "*/" -include upgrade/dir1/** -include

Full_Name: Michael Bauer Version: 2.7.0 OS: Solaris 10 (sparc) Submission from: (NULL) (130.64.21.7) When running 'make check' on a fresh R 2.7.0 build on Solaris 10 (sparc), reg-tests-1.R fails consistently because the test directory /tmp/R<random> cannot be deleted. The reason for the deletion failure is because the file system thinks that the directory is still full, as its

This is not general on Solaris 10 -- it works for others, as the R-admin manual told you. What sort of file system is the test being run on? It does look very like a Solaris file system bug. On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, mjbauer at eecs.tufts.edu wrote: > Full_Name: Michael Bauer > Version: 2.7.0 > OS: Solaris 10 (sparc) > Submission from: (NULL) (130.64.21.7) > > > When running

My systems: rh61, 2.2.14 + smbfs-nls.patch. I refer to 2.0.7pre3 as 2.0.7 === 1) "ls" of an empty dir 1a) 1.9.18 doing "ls" to an empty samba dir: smb: \> ls 49550 blocks of size 16384. 33754 blocks available 1b) 2.0.7 doing "ls" to an empty samba dir: smb: \> ls ERRDOS - ERRbadfile (File not found.) listing \* <=======

Hi all!! I'm experimenting a set of problems when trying to connect Samba client to windows. I don't have admin rights on the windows side, so I should trust all my winSA admin is telling me. Windows side (server): In the server Side (win2k3), the SA defined a shared resource. The share-permissions tab the "domain users" group has typical permissions, and in the security

Guys, I'm bumping into some stupid problem, really need some fresh ideas. Samba version samba-client-2.2.7-3.7.2 samba-2.2.7-3.7.2 samba-swat-2.2.7-3.7.2 samba-common-2.2.7-3.7.2 The goal is to upload all *.gz files only from dir* dirs. I do mask *.gz recurse mput dir* See the detailed output below But mput keeps grabbing non *.gz files ignoring the mask *.gz command. Am I doing

Guys, I really need some help. Samba version samba-client-2.2.7-3.7.2 samba-2.2.7-3.7.2 samba-swat-2.2.7-3.7.2 samba-common-2.2.7-3.7.2 I'm trying to upload all *.gz files only from dir* dirs. I do mask *.gz recurse mput dir* See the detailed output below But mput keeps grabbing non *.gz files IGNORING the mask *.gz command. Am I doing something stupid here? Thanks, Ruslan. [root at