similar to: Strange dry-run problem

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 60000 matches similar to: "Strange dry-run problem"

2007 Feb 25
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4412] New: --dry-run output inaccurate due to implied symlink
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4412 Summary: --dry-run output inaccurate due to implied symlink Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:
2023 Jun 10
0
[Bug 15393] New: rsync attempts to set extended attributes while in dry-run
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15393 Bug ID: 15393 Summary: rsync attempts to set extended attributes while in dry-run Product: rsync Version: 3.2.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayne
2014 Jun 13
1
--dry-run reliability ?
Hi, I'm using rsync to backup my files. I have also added a pre-backup step where the script checks if there is enough space on the destination for rsync to run successfully. The goal is to make room (delete oldest backups) if that's not the case. I'm running rsync with -ahAXS --numeric-ids --link-dest options. For my pre-backup step, I'm currently using the same options +
2007 Oct 28
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5050] New: rsync tries to --copy-dest in --dry-run mode
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5050 Summary: rsync tries to --copy-dest in --dry-run mode Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: hashproduct+rsync@gmail.com
2013 Oct 30
1
[Bug 10238] New: --dry-run does not change directory, causes --link-dest failure on symlinks
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10238 Summary: --dry-run does not change directory, causes --link-dest failure on symlinks Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at
2003 May 16
0
Dry run missing files
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:40:21PM -0500, Lee Eakin wrote: > > Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 20:11:09 -0700 > > From: jw schultz <jw@pegasys.ws> > > Subject: [RFC] report options > > > > I have hinted in the past of wanting to go to a more > > selective control of the output of rsync. Here it is. > > > > Sounds very cool. I'm guessing that a
2014 Aug 30
1
Cleanest way to find out if it was a --dry-run
Hi, As far as I can see, the only way you can tell it's been a dry-run at the receiver-side, is to parse RSYNC_ARGs in the pre-xfer script. I think the only way is to crawl through the RSYNC_ARGs to find a value which: - starts with a single dash, and; - contains 'n', and; - comes prior to the "." value, signifying the start of the 'path args' (which seem inherently
2003 Oct 22
1
rsync --dry-run --link-dest problem
I am trying to use rsync for making snapshots, sharing hardlinks at the destination using the --link-dest option. In conjunction with this, I would like for --dry-run to report some reliable-ish number for how much space it is going to consume at the destination so that I can arrange to free such space prior the launching rsync "for effect". Right now, that isn't working: #
2005 Mar 28
2
"batched dry-run"... sort of
I'd like to know if it's possible to run rsync in batch mode, but avoiding transferring the deltas, just generating the batch file. I'm looking for such a behaviour because overnight backup sessions are often interrupted and daily snapshots (--link-dest) of remote servers are truncated. Specially the ones using slow links. Options: 1) Using -write-batch when mirroring volume
2012 Sep 17
1
[Bug 9167] New: --dry-run --stats --link-dest provides incorrect stats
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9167 Summary: --dry-run --stats --link-dest provides incorrect stats Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: michele.giacomoli
2013 Oct 16
1
[Bug 10209] New: rsync in dry run reports it will create a backup dir even though it already exists
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10209 Summary: rsync in dry run reports it will create a backup dir even though it already exists Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo:
2020 Mar 10
0
Question/comment about -n (dry run) flag of rsync
T. Shandelman via rsync wrote: > Rsync is a remarkably handy tool that I use virtually every day. > > But there is one thing about rsync that drives me totally crazy. > > Under the -n (dry run) flag, rsync seems to produce exactly the same output > as without that flag. > > I cannot tell you how many times I sit and scratch my head long and > hard,after I discover
2007 Nov 11
1
dry-run bytest to be transferred?
Is there anyway on a dry-run to actually see per file how many bytes are to be transferred? On a normal run I use --log-format=/%f/%l/%b/%i which shows the total file size and the actual bytes transferred. Also, during a dry-run, is there anyway to show the Literal Data? Basically, I'm trying to calculate something before the actual run takes place. Dry-run is telling me which files have
2018 Dec 30
1
--dry-run won't say where the files are going to go
Try as we may (--dry-run), it still won't tell us where it intends to put the files, $ rsync --dry-run --remove-source-files --relative --verbose --itemize-changes -Cavz Maildir/new /tmp/ sending incremental file list delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file cd+++++++++ Maildir/ cd+++++++++ Maildir/new/ >f+++++++++ Maildir/new/1546157908.1392_1.jidanni7 total:
2020 Mar 10
1
Question/comment about -n (dry run) flag of rsync
raf via rsync wrote: > T. Shandelman via rsync wrote: > > > Rsync is a remarkably handy tool that I use virtually every day. > > > > But there is one thing about rsync that drives me totally crazy. > > > > Under the -n (dry run) flag, rsync seems to produce exactly the same output > > as without that flag. > > > > I cannot tell you how
2008 May 30
1
[LLVMdev] PATCH: -dry-run option for llvmc2
This implements -dry-run for llvmc2: $ llvmc2 -dry-run main.c llvm-g++ -c -x c main.c -o /tmp/llvm_bGw2gN/main.bc -emit-llvm llc -f /tmp/llvm_bGw2gN/main.bc -o /tmp/llvm_bGw2gN/main.s llvm-gcc -c -x assembler /tmp/llvm_bGw2gN/main.s -o /tmp/llvm_bGw2gN/main.o llvm-gcc /tmp/llvm_bGw2gN/main.o -o a.out $ llvmc2 -dry-run -opt main.c llvm-g++ -c -x c main.c -o /tmp/llvm_UGZtwL/main.bc -emit-llvm opt
2007 Nov 05
1
Rsync shouldn't display a meaningless speedup on a dry run
On a dry run, rsync displays a speedup value calculated from the total size of the source file data and the amount of data sent over the connection, but this value is meaningless and grossly misleading because the file data is not sent over the connection. Example: [matt@mattlaptop2 test]$ rsync -avi -n ~/eclipse/releases/eclipse-SDK-3.3-linux-gtk.tar.gz . sending incremental file list
2005 Feb 25
0
[Bug 2390] New: some dry run stats inaccurate
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2390 Summary: some dry run stats inaccurate Product: rsync Version: 2.6.4 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: woodd@deshaw.com QAContact:
2014 Sep 06
1
[Bug 10799] New: Feature request: detail --dry-run mode when --debug=exit
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10799 Summary: Feature request: detail --dry-run mode when --debug=exit Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
2015 Apr 01
3
[Bug 11189] New: dry run gives incomplete log
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11189 Bug ID: 11189 Summary: dry run gives incomplete log Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: riquet at