similar to: transferring large encrypted images.

Hi, My company have been using rsync to sync our file to a backup server (running rsync daemon), and now we would like to store them encrypted. I found some thread that discussed this issue but they are pretty old (about 10 years ago). So I send this question again and looking for any new approach. Is there any option or module for rsync to encrypt file on the destination? Thanks a lot, Dat Le

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Xen <list at xenhideout.nl> wrote: > > As I said before, just rsyncing the lower layer (encrypted) of an eCryptfs >> volume may work well -- no multiple decryption-encryption cycles and what >> not.. Say you have an eCryptfs folder named ~/Private, then just keep your >> images in ~/Private and rsync the lower layer in ~/.Private. If

Anyone got any experience/suggestions for a way to store a directory of sensitive information on a CentOS box? This directory contains many scripts and output files, I need it backed up but not unencrypted and don't want to store it in a tar file type archive as when it needs to be accessed and have scripts executed/data generated, it needs to be untarred/unencrypted and I don't know the

Hi Folks, I was wondering if I could ask this question here. Initially when I was thinking up how to do this I was expecting block encryption to stay consistent from one 'encryption run' to the next, but I found out later that most schemes randomize the result by injecting a random block or seed at the beginning and basing all other encrypted data on that. In order to prevent

Hi, I had named a module as "global" and it appears not to be recognized. It appears a section [global] path=xxx etc. is interpreted as global parameters and not as a module named global. Is that the expected behaviour? Any pointers as to what names are allowed for modules will be appreciated. Thanks, Selva -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

I am now investigating encrypting our IMAP user spool files. Does anyone have experience with handling encrypted data stores using either or both of the subject methods and would care tio share their observations? Which is the preferred method (I know: it depends, but on what?)? What administrative pain does each cause? Our IMAP host is a KVM guest so spinning up a duplicate and simply

Hi, I have setup NUT in netserver mode on debian wheezy with two APC UPS units connected to it by usb. lsusb identifies the units as Smart-UPS 1000 and Smart-UPS C1500. It appears these do not use the smart protocol and usbhid-ups is the correct driver to use. System: Debian wheezy with stock version of nut (Version: 2.6.4-2.3+deb7u1) Everything works rather well, except that the

Hi, I wonder if there is interest/intention to allow for encrypted .RData files? One can certainly do that outside R manually but that will leave a decrypted RData file somewhere which one has to remember to delete. Cheers, Michael

Hi all, I recently came across a possible requirement of backing up certain files on a remote server ... in an encrypted format. This got me seriously thinking about the possibility of doing such a thing with rsync. I am not too knowledgable about encryption and the mechanisms of the rsync algorithm (at least as yet :), but I would like to know whether this is attainable or 'far fetched'

Hi Charles, Thanks for your response. > For the 1000, do the values match this page? > > > http://buildbot.networkupstools.org/~buildbot/cayman/docs/latest/ddl/APC/Smart-UPS_1000.html > > Yes it does (except that mine is a 120 V model, so input/output voltage is about 125) It doesn't look like we have an entry for a C1500 yet. Would you care to > submit the output of

Hi, Is it possible to configure Dovecot to reject mail that is not encrypted. In other words: 1. If the user tries to send an unencrypted message from their MUA, the server rejects it. 2. If a third-party tries to send an unencrypted message to the user, the server rejects it. The end result would be that no mail stored on the server can be decrypted by the administrator. I am aware that: *

Rainy Days via rsync wrote: > Hi, > > My company have been using rsync to sync our file to a backup server (running rsync daemon), and now we would like to store them encrypted. > I found some thread that discussed this issue but they are pretty old (about 10 years ago). So I send this question again and looking for any new approach. > Is there any option or module for rsync to

Hello, I have asked on the postfix mailing list for a solution, how to encrypt incoming emails with public gpg key My original idea was to use a smtpd-milter, which would encrypt all incoming plaintext messages of given user, using the users public gpg key. This way, it would look as if the original sender has sent the message encrypted. Somebody suggested this might be better done in Dovecot,

On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:38:35 -0400, Selva Nair wrote: > As with any dedup solution, performance does take a hit and its often > not worth it unless you have a lot of duplication in the data. This is so only in some volumes in our case, but it appears that zfs permits this to be enabled/disabled on a per-volume basis. That would work for us. Is there a way to save cycles by offering zfs

Hello Why is it necessary to specify encrypt passwords = no to make Samba server start using solely /etc/passwd? Isn't it possible to tell Samba server that on the way between a client and the server, the passwords sould be encrypted, and after decryption, they will be checked against /etc/passwd and not smbpasswd, tdb or whatever backend? Cl<

rje writes: > I'm looking into ways to encrypt the stored email on my server. The idea is > to make it impossible for my hosting provider (who has access to my VPS) to > read the mail from the disk. Just to be clear, if at any point your VPS has access to the plaintext mail (or keys that decrypt mail), then the VPS provider could access your decrypted mail. To make it unfeasible

Why are you encrypting the files and not the filesystem and the channel? On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Xen <list at xenhideout.nl> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I was wondering if I could ask this question here. > > Initially when I was thinking up how to do this I was expecting block > encryption to stay consistent from one 'encryption run' to the next, but I >

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 4:48 PM, < dbonde+forum+rsync.lists.samba.org at gmail.com> wrote: > That doesn't make sense. Both the source and destination path contains > simple alphanumeric characters, no more no less. Why would it matter > whether the path is /abc/ or /def/ or even /123/? Hmm.. I thought your are the one who has been asking for help. It does very much matter

Hi Chris, thanks for your answer. It is the first time I decided to encrypt my lvm. I choosed to encrypt the volume group, not every logical volume itself, because in case of doing lvm snapshots in that group they will be encrypted too? And how do I create a new encrypted volume group? Regards Tim Am 6. M?rz 2015 01:58:23 MEZ, schrieb Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com>: >On

Hi all, I'm looking for a way to recreate the functionality of PGP Disk (under Win32). Basically, create an encrypted file, which contains a filesystem which can then be mounted in any mount point. I know I can use GELI in FreeBSD 6 - as I understand, it performs the encryption at the partition level (the whole partition is encrypted). I'd like to be able to simply unmount my