similar to: What is the default compression level for local synchronisation?

On 05/10/15 17:30, rsync-request at lists.samba.org wrote: >> Should we use --compress-level=0 for local synchronisation? We >> are using rsync 3.0.9 and 3.1.1. > You should not use compression at all on local copies. It is nothing > but wasted CPU cycles. ... - -- ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._., - -*~

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:49 PM Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> wrote: > Nothing there should be preventing incremental indexing. That means it > should start copying as soon as it finds a file that needs to be copied. > Doesn't it tries to create all (empty) directories first? > On 03/20/2018 02:33 PM, Bráulio Bhavamitra wrote: > > > > > > Em seg, 19

First, a little background: I successfully migrated the samba PDC funtionality from an old Suse machine to a new debian-based one. The old machine was named PHOENIX and had an ip address of 10.10.10.4. The new one has the same name but is on 10.10.10.14. Everything is working just fine with this new domain (authentication, adding users, computers, printing etc), except for one laptop. Since the

OK. Thanks. Where can I find information regarding how to interpret —itemize-changes? The timestamps aren’t changing, so the target must not be storing them, which I have no idea why. The directory I’m writing to is 777. What is the flag to tell rsync to ignore the timestamps? Thanks, Blake On 6/2/16, 6:18 PM, "rsync on behalf of Kevin Korb" <rsync-bounces at lists.samba.org on

Em seg, 19 de mar de 2018 11:34, Kevin Korb via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> escreveu: > The performance of rsync with a huge number of files is greatly > determined by every option you are using. So, what is your whole > command line? > rsync -avP /data-old/ /data > > On 03/19/2018 09:05 AM, Bráulio Bhavamitra via rsync wrote: > > Hi all, > > > >

Thank you! I run --times when I use rsync (I actually use the -a flag) but the times do not transfer over and if I run rsync dryrun with -i I can see that it wants to transfer the files because of times. When I run rsync a second time with your suggestion the times do transfer over. I don't know why... B ________________________________________ From: rsync [rsync-bounces at lists.samba.org]

Thanks Kevin! I¹m unclear how to read the ‹itemize-changes output. Can you provide some insight? This is a local transfer from an external drive to an internal drive all attached to one computer. rsync -aPh --itemize-changes -n /Volumes/shuttle_05/2012_79_1_14_1__1199_Workprint /Volumes/3TB_LTO/LT003A/ sending incremental file list >f..t.......

How do I transfer just the modification times with rsync? I now the file content is the same but the modification times are different. Is there a way to do this? Every way that I have tried causes the whole file to transfer as well. Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Help me Tell it is possible to make double-side synchronisation of two servers? So that it passed only on time. For example at an identical set of files on two servers any file on the first to change, i.e. for it time modify will exchange. It means becomes newer and it is necessary to transfer it to other server. And on the contrary, if modification time for any file of the second server it to

Cool Thanks! Specifically, the timestamps on both <src> and <dest> match for "ls -l" but do not match for "ls -lu" or "ls -lc” The storage is just an regular HDD in a mac pro tower. I can’t imagine why it wouldn’t handle timestamps. Also of note - this problem doesn’t exist for every file, just the vast majority. So, that just makes it more confusing. Yes,

Hi Kevin, I haven't specified --whole-file. After entering an rsync command the terminal always reads "delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file" but I assume that is just a standard phrase that always appears. So, if I am running partial (-P) and not using --whole-file or disabling the delta-transmission, why would an incomplete file be deleted and the

All, I'm working in an environment *very* restricted by space, and need to sync from that location to another location. So I'd like to be able to sync from a source that is not a filesystem, like a compressed tarball. Is this possible with the --files-from argument (or some other such argument)? If not, what approach would people suggest in adding it? thanks much for any support, ed

If I do not add "ress" into the data frame "res", there is no quote in the data frame. However, I add "ress", all column were found the quote. How to remove it? If you can delete the quote in the file "ress", that is better. Thanks. > ress[1:10] [1] "ABHO.ABNE" "ABHO.ACBA" "ABHO.ACGI" "ABHO.ACKO"

I have a command (setup by someone else of course) that reads: [code] rsync [OPTIONS....] rsync://<user>@<host>/<server> <destination> [/code] I don't get the <server> bit. There's no folder by the name <server> anywhere on <host>. <server> is in fact an external server which <host> has ethernet access to. It's shares are mounted

I guess cwRsync is now a paid package. It looks like the last no-charge edition was 4.2. I see BackupAssist.com has 4.1 Server available on their site: https://www.backupassist.com/rsync/ I'd like to find both the Server and Client to 4.2 or 4.1, clean (safe) copies. Any ideas where I can find these installers? -- View this message in context:

Given the structure… /foo/bar/want-this.txt /foo/bar/want-this-2.txt /bar/foo/ /do-not-want-to-transfer/test.txt With the desire to ‘include items with foo in their path’... I understand that the closest I can get to a satisfactory filter ruleset is something like: + **foo** + */ - * … and setting --prune-empty-dirs. However, /bar/foo/ is empty, and of course should be copied.. but is pruned.

rsync in daemon mode is very powerful, yet it comes with one big disadvantage: data is sent in plain. The workarounds are not really satisfying: - use VPN - one needs to set up an extra service, not always possible - use stunnel - as above - use SSH - is not as powerful as in daemon mode (i.e. read only access, chroot, easy way of adding/modifying users and modules etc.) Why was encrypted

Hi, I see some warnings like the following. Could anybody explains what they mean? Thanks. 19/31274477.pdf 257,169,119 0% 1.26MB/s 0:03:15 (xfr#121, to-chk=848309/1043298)WARNING: 18/32281577.pdf failed verification -- update retained (will try again). WARNING: 19/28879866.pdf failed verification -- update retained (will try again). -- Regards, Peng

is there a script which analyses rsync output with --itemize-changes ? i.e. i would like to have extended information on number of deleted files, created directories, changed files.... i know rsync 3.1.x is better with this, but it`s still not in centos 5/6/7 and i don`t want to update tons of systems to get extended statistics, so i wonder if anbody did an analyze script to get that information

You could try using an automounter, like autofs, in combination with sshfs. It'll be slower, possibly a lot slower, but it should be more reliable over an unreliable connection. I've been using: remote -fstype=fuse,allow_other,nodev,noatime,reconnect,ServerAliveInterval=15,ServerAliveCountMax=40,uid=0,gid=0,ro,nodev,noatime :sshfs\#root at remote.host.com\:/ BTW, I'm not sure