Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send"
2024 Feb 09
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #39 from andy <andy at digitalsignalperson.com> ---
> This feature request is so old it has lost relavence because btrfs/zfs/etc are more optimal backup solutions than rsync.
Funny I am doing exactly this, but I came to rsync looking for a backup for
when ZFS fails. Many consider zfs/btrfs/snapshots as "not a backup".
2005 Feb 11
2
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
------- Additional Comments From blackb1rd@seat-ibiza.nl 2005-02-11 01:58 -------
I totally agree this one. With this enhancement there would be no longer
unnecessary traffic when some user has moved / copy'ed a large directory (which
is really annoying).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You
2011 Jan 29
5
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
------- Comment #12 from phr-samba at nightsong.com 2011-01-28 20:38 CST -------
Hi, I was about to enter a similar suggestion to this. My very frequent use
case is moving files from one directory to another. In that situation the file
name does not change--just the directory path leading to it. These are often
quite large files (0.2 to
2016 Mar 06
1
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #23 from dajoker at gmail.com ---
Looking for this capability prior to entering it as an enhancement request
myself, I found everything here and basically have the same use case. My
version is that I am creating a regular backup of logs from many servers'
services onto a single box, and doing so with rsync. Some of those services
2016 Mar 07
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #24 from Karl O. Pinc <kop at meme.com> ---
On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 22:20:16 +0000
samba-bugs at samba.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
>
> --- Comment #23 from dajoker at gmail.com ---
> Looking for this capability prior to entering it as an enhancement
> request myself, I found everything
2016 Mar 07
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #25 from Andrey Gursky <andrey.gursky at e-mail.ua> ---
On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 22:20:16 +0000
samba-bugs at samba.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
>
> --- Comment #23 from dajoker at gmail.com ---
> Looking for this capability prior to entering it as an enhancement request
> myself, I found
2007 Jul 11
0
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
boris@folgmann.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |boris@folgmann.de
------- Comment #6 from boris@folgmann.de 2007-07-11 09:50 CST -------
I'm using rsync 2.6.9 to archive rotated
2005 Feb 01
0
[Bug 2294] New: Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
Summary: Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of
delete/re-send
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.3
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2008 Nov 30
0
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
------- Comment #8 from bill+samba@bfccomputing.com 2008-11-30 17:24 CST -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Thanks. This will be especially useful for log directories where logrotate is
> incrementing the filename number at each rotation period (httpd.10.gz ->
> httpd.11.gz).
Since I mentioned this specific use case, I should
2014 Mar 02
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #20 from kevin.layer at gmail.com 2014-03-02 03:08:37 UTC ---
I've been playing with the --detect-renamed patch
https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync-patches.git;a=blob;f=detect-renamed.diff;h=c3e6e846eab437e56e25e2c334e292996ee84345;hb=master
I can't get seem it to work. Does it rely on other patches?
Anyway, in a simple test, using
2016 Dec 30
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #26 from Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson at gmail.com> ---
### What's the diff between --fuzzy and --detect-renamed ?
If I understand correctly, --fuzzy looks only in destination folder, for either
a file that has an identical size and modified-time, or a similarly-named file,
and uses it as a basis file.
Whereas --detect-renamed looks
2017 Jan 22
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #27 from Wolfgang Hamann <wolfgang at maas-noten.de> ---
Hi,
I recently ran into the problem that a large file set got renamed and then
re-sent. I tried to fix after the fact, so I went the obvious way of comparing
sizes and modtimes on the destination and calculate checksums for potential
matches. I would have preferred to use a
2024 Feb 09
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #40 from roland <devzero at web.de> ---
> This feature request is so old it has lost relavence because btrfs/zfs/etc are more optimal backup solutions than rsync.
sorry, but this comment is totally nonsense, as btrfs and zfs are filesystems
(i.e. places to store data) whereas rsync is a tool to sync data from one place
to
2024 Apr 03
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #41 from Mihnea-Costin Grigore <mihnea at zulu.ro> ---
The discussion about file systems like ZFS/BTRFS/etc. and their various
snapshot mechanisms is off-topic relative to this feature request, since they
are very different technologies used for different purposes.
rsync is used commonly to synchronise at the *file level* between
2013 Jan 29
0
detect-renamed questions
Hello,
I was looking for "detect renamed" feature in rsync
(https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294) so used rsync-3.0.9
with patches detect-renamed.diff and detect-renamed-lax.diff.
I have 2 questions, not sure if I'm missing something (options) or if
it is working as intended and could be improved.
1) It does not detect a rename when a file is moved into another
2014 Mar 28
4
[Bug 10522] New: --detect-renamed patch is causing deletions as if a 'delete flag' was supplied, when none have been
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10522
Summary: --detect-renamed patch is causing deletions as if a
'delete flag' was supplied, when none have been
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Platform: x86
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
2014 Oct 14
2
[Bug 2294] New: parsing known hosts files with tabs doesn't work
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
Bug ID: 2294
Summary: parsing known hosts files with tabs doesn't work
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 6.7p1
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: ssh
Assignee: unassigned-bugs
2009 Nov 11
1
--detect-renamed --detect-moved and -b
Hi,
I played around with the combination of rsync --detect-renamed
--detect-moved and -b.
Given the following tree:
src/dir/file
dest/src/dir/file
I renamed src/dir to src/dir2 and ran the following command:
rsync -a --detect-renamed --detect-moved --delete -b --backup-dir=bak src dest
ending up with:
dest/bak/src/dir/file
Is it supposed to do that? I was expecting it to detect the renamed
2016 May 23
2
samba4 AD - winbind Could not write result
Hello,
I have two samba 4.2.7-SerNet-Debian-8.wheezy AD servers. since few days
now I have some winbind errorsthat block the server...
It seems that they appears more and more frequently... ( about one time
per day )
I have about 200 clients pc with windows 10, seven and XP. Last month
I've migrated about 30 pc from seven to 10. Is there a relationship?
In the following logs, you can see
2007 Oct 12
0
detect-renamed.diff fixes and improvements
Wayne,
The detect-renamed.diff in the current CVS rsync appears to be very
badly broken. I have fixed it and made some other improvements:
Crash fixes:
- Move misplaced the_fattr_list initialization hunk back to recv_file_list
- Send --detect-renamed to the sender so it knows to disable incremental
recursion
- With --partial-dir=. , look_for_rename returns rather than crashing
Improvements: