similar to: Odd VPN connectivity problem

On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 10:48 +0100, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > Mandi! Jon Gerdes via samba > ? In chel di` si favelave... > > > I think that winbind is binding to an address and claiming to be the wrong one when the VPN is running and hence > > breaking things.? I've tried "bind interfaces only" but that does not work.? > > OpenVPN and Samba on the

(Sorry for delay - hols) On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 09:24 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:33:40PM +0000, Jon Gerdes via samba wrote: > I haven't depended on a AD-DC for my network logons for > many years I'm afraid, so I've not had to depend on this :-). Fair enough and I'd rather not either but this is my last outstanding issue before Linux on the

On 10/28/2020 3:31 AM, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > Mandi! Dan Egli via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > >> Why on earth would samba even CARE about group permissions when user >> permissions are perfectly fine? Help me fix this? > Consider that, if POSIX ACL are enabled on this FS, the group > permission are considered as a 'mask' for all ACL, with

I'm really confused about something. It seems like on my samba server the user AND GROUP permissions must match for me to access any files in my home directory. Here's an example of what I mean: ($ = at unix shell, > = in smbclient) $ mkdir ~dan/test1 $ chmod 700 ~dan/test1 $ smbclient -U dan //localhost/dan > cd test1 > put test1.txt (failure, NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED) > quit

I''ve just discovered that I do not have access to the remote gateways for a set of IPsec tunnels to remote networks. This prevents me from changing the routing table on those gateways. I need "roadwarrior" systems connecting to me local network using OpenVPN (tun) to be able to access those systems. Since the remote gateways don''t know about 10.100.1.0/24, where my

Reding the thread in list about gluster, i've found that in your samba packages 4.5.12+dfsg-2+deb9u2~bpo8+1 there's no vfs_glusterfs module, only the manpage. root at vdmsv1:~# grep glusterfs /var/lib/dpkg/info/samba*.list /var/lib/dpkg/info/samba-vfs-modules.list:/usr/share/man/man8/vfs_glusterfs.8.gz root at vdmsv1:~# grep /vfs/ /var/lib/dpkg/info/samba*.list

Reading here i've understod that for LDAP query it is better to use SAMAccountName as 'login', but today i've found: https://docs.microsoft.com/it-it/windows/desktop/ADSchema/a-samaccountname so, 'SAMAccountName' is a compatibility field with NT mode, limited to 20 chars. Someone here use 21 chars logins? ;-) -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66

I've read all docs on upgrades, from wiki to Louis notes, and i think i'm ready to upgrade. First step, move from stretch to jessie, and from 4.5 to 4.8, upgrade in place. But having a domain with 6 DCs, i'm a bit scared to upgrade all DC in one turn, and i'm think about something like: a) upgrade DC with FSMO roles, then wait 1-2 day to spot troubles b) then upgrade all DC in

On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:51:47 +0100 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I've seen: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/PAM_Offline_Authentication > > I've tried to enable offline logon, and seems to work as expected. > > I've only found a little strange thing, i think related to the fact > that in my DM i've set

Full_Name: M. Edward Borasky Version: 1.2.3 (2001-04-26) OS: Windows 2000 Submission from: (NULL) (206.98.121.224) I have a Celeron with 192 MB of RAM. My paging file is 288 MB, which is the Windows recommended size. Here's the starting screen: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- R : Copyright 2001, The R Development Core Team Version 1.2.3

Samba 4.8 (Louis debian repo), DM. Today i've had to recovery a deleted file in that share, that use 'vfs_recycle' modules: [Work] comment = Spazio di Lavoro Utente map acl inherit = Yes path = /srv/work read only = No store dos attributes = Yes vfs objects = acl_xattr recycle full_audit volume = Work full_audit:failure = none full_audit:success = mkdir rmdir read pread

I'm starting to upgrade my domain members to debian stretch/samba 4.8, using louis packages. Domain controllers still on jessie/samba45. Upgrade went smooth, but after upgrade seems that the DM was not able anymore to retrieve rfc2307 data, eg: root at vdmsv2:~# getent passwd gaio gaio:*:10000:10513:Marco Gaiarin:/home/LNFFVG/gaio:/bin/false root at vdmsv2:~# ldbsearch -H

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... > I hope this clarifies things, Super-clear! Thanks! -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66 Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia'' http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/ Polo FVG - Via della Bontà, 7 - 33078 - San Vito al Tagliamento (PN) marco.gaiarin(at)lanostrafamiglia.it t

I need to close a site. No, no people fired, i've defined sites and DC because i hope that get (re)opened, but... There's some care i need to have to remove a DC (clearly, without FSMO roles)? I've looked on wiki to 'remove a DC' but i was not able to find something... Thanks. -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66 Associazione ``La Nostra

Ahem no one reply me. A little fast-rewind: i need to have some 'aliases' to my servers (DM); seems i need to add in smb.conf: netbios aliases = FILESV but also add a 'SPN'; trying to look around for an examples, lead me to ''nothing'', or to examples that seems to me unrelated. Supposing the domain is 'ad.fvg.lnf.it' and the FQDN of the real host is

I need to do a simple query, against some LDAP data in 'laster draft schema' format i've added to te samba/AD schema. All LDAP query return the same result on all (6) of the DC: root at vdcsv1:~# ldapsearch -H ldap://vdcsv2.ad.fvg.lnf.it -W -D CN=mta,OU=Restricted,DC=ad,DC=fvg,DC=lnf,DC=it -b DC=ad,DC=fvg,DC=lnf,DC=it "(cn=prova123)" rfc822MailMember Enter LDAP Password:

Debian stretch, louis packages 4.9.16+dfsg-0.1~stretch~1 . After some time (roughly: two weeks) my DC with FSMO roles (seems that other DC are unaffected) goes suddenly on trash: memory jump from 50% (3GB) to 100%, container start to swap and slow down (load 10-15) al the phisical server. A simple restart solve all the troubles. Some hint on how to debug that? Thanks. -- dott. Marco Gaiarin

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > Not sure what you are proposing is going to work, AD expects every user > to be a member of Domain Users, even though there is nothing in AD to > show membership. Ah. > Do you require this user to visible on all domain machines ? [...] > It might help if you could explain how you are going to use your new > user

[ I've just asked abut that, here, but now seems a simpler things, so i retry... ] This seems NON a samba touble, but a different behaviour in M$ client OS. But, really, i've not clue how to find an answer... Suppose to have a Win7 and a Win10 machine, both NOT joined to a domain. Suppose to have a share, with guest access enabled, where only readonly access are needed. Suppose also

Following: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Demoting_a_Samba_AD_DC i've demoted and removed a DC. Seems all went as expected: root at vdcud1:~# samba-tool domain demote --server=vdcsv1.ad.fvg.lnf.it -U gaio Using vdcsv1.ad.fvg.lnf.it as partner server for the demotion Password for [LNFFVG\gaio]: Deactivating inbound replication Asking partner server vdcsv1.ad.fvg.lnf.it to synchronize