similar to: Arstechnica reviews Samba-based iXsystems TrueNAS Core

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 7:47 PM Jeremy Allison via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Really nice write-up on the Samba-based > Open Source project ! > > > https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/07/an-easy-mode-for-zfs-we-test-the-truenas-core-12-0-beta/ > > Congratulations to the FreeNAS/TrueNAS folks ! > > Jeremy. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this

On Nov 18, 2015, at 12:16 PM, Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net> wrote: > > Once upon a time, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> said: >> - They?re serious server-grade machines, not borderline flimsy boxes competing largely on price. Built in and supported from Silicon Valley, not China. :) > > iXsystems sells rebadged SuperMicro stuff, nothing special (not made

On Nov 18, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 11/18/2015 07:31 AM, Tim Evans wrote: >> Would like to hear recommendations here. > > https://www.ixsystems.com/freenas-mini/ For those who don?t know why you?d pay $1000 for a diskless 4-bay NAS box when there are $300-500 boxes that are superficially similar from QNAP, Synology,

Hi! Does the sight of a poorly formatted, though syntactically valid, configuration file make at least one of your eyelids twitch? Have you ever disowned a family member after failing to convince them to back up their systems properly? Have you ever spent an evening compulsively labeling cables in an operational rack? If you answered ?Yes, oh God, yes!!? to at least 2 of the 3 questions above,

I have a Cyber Power LE1000DG UPS I got from Best Buy this weekend. I plan to use it with a TrueNAS scale system, and it is connected via USB. Vendor link: https://www.cyberpowersystems.com/product/ups/battery-backup/le1000dg/. TrueNAS has you pick a UPS driver. I could not find any "LE" related models on https://networkupstools.org/stable-hcl.html (which is the list TrueNAS uses). Per

I have a Smart-UPS RT 3000 XL connected via serial cable to TrueNAS TrueNAS-9.2.1.2-RELEASE-x64 (002022c) which runs on FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE-p3. When I start the NUT service, I get the message: Oct 20 01:53:50 truenas notifier: very old or unknown APC model, support will be limited Which I interpret as an indicator of less than optimal operating mode. I suspect that the model identifier is not

Are any plans for an API that would allow ZFS commands including snapshot/rollback integrated with customer''s application? Thanks, Cherry

That isn't how rsync should work with -a. Is something preventing it from backdating the file? What is the filesystem? Can you try copying your 2015 file with cp -a? On 10/9/24 14:56, McDowell, Blake wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > The -a flag in this instance is not back-dating the timestamp of the > copied file to the source file. It is modifying it to the time of > transfer

Hi everyone. I'm looking to solve an issue with Samba on a NAS being accessed with TreeSize Pro. Using that program to scan through millions of files is eating up memory on swap and eventually crashing the system. It's scanning mounted CIFS shares on the NAS running TrueNAS with samba version 3.6.9 We have a test case and have been able to replicate the issue on another machine. The

Hi I have a bunch of FreeNAS servers and a TrueNAS HA server all spamming the logs with these messages every minute about their own source name (examples below). These boxes are on two physically separate networks, and I find it unlikely both networks should have some sort of undetected loop. Any ideas on how to debug this? Samba version is 4.1.18. FreeNAS box on network A " Jan 5

In another thread recursive snapshot creation was found atomic so that it is done quickly, and more important, all at once or nothing at all. Do you know if recursive destroying and renaming of snapshots are atomic too? Regards Henrik Heino

Hello, I have a question about how/why rsync updates modification times, which I haven?t been able to find an answer to. I have two locally connected storage devices running TrueNAS Core: one is new and empty, while the other is filled with files. When I run the following rsync command: rsync -avPh --itemize-changes --stats "${@}" to transfer files from the full storage to the empty

Hi. While submitting SDR-0149 on ZFS bug I encountered problem with format utility. This is v240 with snv_29 with internal disks. On s0 slices there is zfs pool (which is not imported). I did unload zfs modules then moved zfs driver and run format. Now format quits just because there''s no zfs module (and not even one zfs pool is imported). It shouldn''t behave that

I contacted the author of ''lsof'' regarding the missing ZFS support. The command works but fails to display any files that are opened by the process in a ZFS filesystem. He indicates that the required ZFS kernel structure definitions (header files) are not shipped with the OS. He further indicated that he rummaged through the OpenSolaris source tree and the files doesn''t

Heya, first time posting to a mailing list so please excuse me if I do something wrong :) I'm new to NUT and trying to get things working on my TrueNAS, I have a "Vultech 1500VA" UPS which comes with the software "PowerManager II" and it seems to be using the "richcomm_usb" driver. There are 5 devices in the compatibility list and I tried all of them, sadly to

You are using rsync -a which copies (preserves) the timestamp. Meaning that rsync will copy the file then back-date it to the timestamp of the source file. Most copying tools do not do this though cp's -a does it too. Note that your itemized output says that the timestamp is different meaning that the file has changed since rsync last ran. Without the -a (or the included -t) the

Warren Young wrote: > [...] >>> What do they suggest as a replacement? > > Stratis: https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf Can I use that now? > The main downside to Stratis I see is that it looks like 1.0 is scheduled to coincide with RHEL 8, based on the release dates of RHELs past, which means it won?t have any kind of redundant storage options to

Once upon a time, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> said: > - They?re serious server-grade machines, not borderline flimsy boxes competing largely on price. Built in and supported from Silicon Valley, not China. :) iXsystems sells rebadged SuperMicro stuff, nothing special (not made in Silicon Valley). We bought an iXsystems TrueNAS (commercial version of FreeNAS +

Hi Kevin, The -a flag in this instance is not back-dating the timestamp of the copied file to the source file. It is modifying it to the time of transfer and leaving it that way. Then any time I rerun that command it always updates the timestamp since it is always making it the time of transfer. I have a source file the has a modification date of 2015 and when I rsync it to day with -a the copied

Once upon a time, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> said: > The FreeNAS Mini from iX Systems is a good deal more expensive, but > the ones I've worked with have been reliable and well suited to > running ZFS with good performance. I just retired a TrueNAS (the iX Systems "enterprise" version of FreeNAS, on hardware they sold pre-configured), and I don't