similar to: Samba vs Windows - File sharing in a domain setting

Hi Louis, The idea I had with this thread is to just get an honest comparison between Windows and Samba when it comes to file sharing needs in the Windows world, the missing Windows Search capability was just an example to get the discussion going. If I understand your reference correctly, there is a solution, compatible with Apple's Spotlight, to index files on a Samba server using

Hai Viktor, I dont know or can't tell if this setup can use the windows indexing, i havent looked in to that. I dont use windows indexer. But i do know if you setup as shown and you add a webpage to the server, that makes is also usable for Windows users to search. There was some work done in the area

I dont know if you want this but i think, its close to what you. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Spotlight_with_Elasticsearch_Backend Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Viktor Trojanovic via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 2 juni 2020 15:32 > Aan: samba > Onderwerp: [Samba] Samba vs Windows - File

Hi Louis, I used your excellent packages but also tried building from source. I?m trying to get Tracker working. Elasticsearch was simpler to get going but it doesn?t really suite the use case due to limitations in fscrawler. I actually created the mdssvc user but also tried directly under root once the dedicated user didn?t work. The problem might be somewhere in D-Bus configuration but I

Let me guess. You accessing your server like : \\servername\netlogon of \\servername\sysvol Well thats protected by windows these these days. Try with \\servername.domain.tld\netlogon or \\servername.domain.tld\sysvol Does that work? Yes, There is a whole chaper of this on the list somewhere.. Best is to read howto override this. https://adsecurity.org/?p=1405 and for you

I’m currently trying to install a new (primary) AD DC in a Linux container. It seems to me that being in a container, the DC is easier to maintain and backup than on bare metal, and I prefer a container over a VM for performance reasons. If the container setup will prove to be too much of hassle, I’ll switch to a VM, though. The first issue I’m facing is time synchronization. An container cannot

I?m trying to setup Spotlight with Tracker (2.3 from Ubuntu repo) backend in Ubuntu 20.04 and Samba 4.12.7. I?ve followed the wiki closely but every time I try to search I get this in the logs: [2020/10/02 10:43:42.078242, 0] ../../source3/rpc_server/mdssvc/mdssvc_tracker.c:403(mds_tracker_search_start) mds_tracker_search_start: no connection to Tracker [2020/10/02 10:43:42.079897, 0]

Here are my (little) view regarding shares accesses. I write that to clarify things. And it could really be of-topic as Louis seems to have gave solution. There are 2 levels of authorisation for accessing shares: the share level and FS level. For Sysvol I would keep everyone or replace it by "authenticated users" in paranoid mode as the latter refuse non-authenticated users. They are

On 17/11/15 16:57, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > Hi Mathias, > > Thanks for replying. It seems you're describing the situation on the > AD DC. Computer and user mode access to my DC works fine and without > any issues but I can't access the shares of my *member* server *in > computer mode*. In user mode, it all works just fine. > > Viktor > > On 17.11.2015

On 22.09.2019 15:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 22/09/2019 13:53, Viktor Trojanovic via samba wrote: >> I just ran "apt upgrade" on my DC (Ubuntu 18.04, Samba 4.10 from Louis >> Repo) and it ended with error messages about unmet dependencies in >> regards >> to libldb1. >> > Yes, but did you run 'apt-get update' first ? > >

On 22.09.2019 15:30, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 22/09/2019 14:10, Viktor Trojanovic via samba wrote: >> On 22.09.2019 15:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 22/09/2019 13:53, Viktor Trojanovic via samba wrote: >>>> I just ran "apt upgrade" on my DC (Ubuntu 18.04, Samba 4.10 from Louis >>>> Repo) and it ended with error messages

On 25.01.2016 14:13, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > Hi Ole, > > Unless you want to add functionality that is new since 1511, I don't > think that's necessary. I have already added a Win10 machine to a domain, where only Win7 clients were joined before that. I have managed this domain from Win7 only, so far. Therefore I believe that e.g. the Windows Update policy is not fit for

Hi Noel, As we discussed on the list, I busy getting the bits and pieces in place to be able to test your windows search work. I am running all my stuff on Debian Bullseye, with Samba code in 3 lxc-containers. Two are for the DCs, one is the fileserver. Everything is managed by Ansible code, I try to avoid manual changes to my environment(s) as much as possible. Generally manual changes are

On 11/16/2015 11:15 AM, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > > > On 16.11.2015 16:54, Ole Traupe wrote: >> Is this your first-and-only DC ever for that domain? >> >> Did you try to re-join the Win clients with deleting the client >> objects after the 'leave'? >> >> Ole >> > > Yes, first and only. As I said, it's more or less a lab setup

On 16.11.2015 14:44, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 16/11/15 13:25, Ole Traupe wrote: >> >> >> Am 16.11.2015 um 14:06 schrieb Viktor Trojanovic: >>> >>> >>> On 16.11.2015 13:48, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>>> See replies below >>>> >>>> On 16.11.2015 12:39, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>> On 16/11/15 11:19,

I was experiencing problems with Group Policy Objects. The Windows Event Viewer spits out so many different errors, most of them less than helpful, so Iwas seeking help here with some of those messages. In the end, and after many hours and even days of researching this problem, I seem to have pin-pointed the main issue to some simple permission irregularities that I don't know how to

There is nothing wrong with your policies. Test if it all works and if it does, ignore these messages. I having the same message. ( samba 4.2.5 ) Gr. Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Viktor Trojanovic > Verzonden: maandag 16 november 2015 15:54 > Aan: Rowland Penny; samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp:

Viktor, thanks again! Now that I did this (added the Win10 1511 ADMX files to the central store), I probably will have to recreate the policies that will be applied to Win10 machines, right? Ole On 21.01.2016 17:16, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > Hi Ole, > > I've been using Samba with Win10 clients for a while now, so I'm happy > to share some of my findings. > > See

Hai Victor, Sorry for these, i did not know there was still one going on in the ubuntu package. These are known since 26 july.. What i need/want to know here from which version to which version did you upgrade. I'll fix that in the next update. There where 2 things going on here. - one file moved from package. (apt --fix-broken install) - The othere was due to the changes in ldb with

Is this your first-and-only DC ever for that domain? Did you try to re-join the Win clients with deleting the client objects after the 'leave'? Ole Am 16.11.2015 um 16:26 schrieb Viktor Trojanovic: > > > On 16.11.2015 15:59, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >> There is nothing wrong with your policies. >> >> Test if it all works and if it does, ignore these messages.