similar to: Follow symlinks vs bind-mount

So, I have a directory of symlinks that I''m managing and Tidy doesn''t seem to be doing much for me in there. Does Tidy ignore symlinks for some reason? If not, does anyone have the correct syntax? Thanks, Trevor --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To

Am 18.01.2017 um 20:01 schrieb Matthew Delfino via samba: > UPDATE: These commands seem to have addressed my problem, but I don’t know if it’s a lame or elegant hack: > > ln -s /usr/lib/libwbclient.so.0.13 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwbclient.so.0.13 > cd /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ > rm libwbclient.so.0 > ln -s libwbclient.so.0.13 libwbclient.so.0 looks extremely dirty and

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We had 3.0.2a which worked fine. If you tried to open a file that the ACLs wouldn't let you, you'd get access denied. We had follow symlinks=no in smb.conf Now with 3.0.8, and no other changes, we get a message about "The file has moved or otherwise gone away," instead of access denied. And we get this in the log file: [2004/11/16

Hello, Samba version: 3.5.6, OS CentOS 5.5 64-bit. The problem: I have a share with symlinks leading outside the share. After mounting the shared resource (cifs), I can't proceed through symlinks (permission denied). Setting options follow symlinks = yes wide links = yes for the share doesn't change Samba behaviour. Could someone enlighten me on how to handle this? Thanks.

Hi, this issue was discussed here twice in the not so far history (http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-January/028317.html, http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-February/029147.html), but I need to open it again as it makes problems for our users on one side and on the other side we don't want to diverge from the upstream sources in our packages. I agree with Timo that simply

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436145 anyone a clue what is going on here?

OK, I give in, why didn't I get the OPs reply to my post ? On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 13:23:16 -0600 Matthew Delfino via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On 2017.01.18, at 1:16 PM, Reindl Harald via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > Am 18.01.2017 um 20:01 schrieb Matthew Delfino via samba: > >> UPDATE: These commands

Hi gang: I am writing a function to manually install a package from the fileserver, without using the native package management system (in this case, yum). This is useful when we, for whatever reason, don''t wish to install the latest package from yum using the built-in support for installing packages. In the process, I''ve found what appears to be a bug. If a file does not

Hai An other possible workaround, You can also try to add the vfs object in the share share its needed. In you global settings : allow insecure wide links = yes unix extensions = no in the share, there where needed. vfs objects = (yourneeded vfs_objects) and wide links = yes vfs object is normaly set in the share not global. At least thats was `man smb.conf` is telling me. The

Dear all, I am trying to synchronize data from a remote machine (ssh) to my local one using rsync (pure scp would overwrite everything every time). The problem is, however, that due to the size of data and available storage, I have to distribute it over several hdd's. For that I have a script, which moves every single file (typical size ~ 4GB) to a different (randomly selected) hdd, leaving

A while back I posted about issues with flac files that were not able to be decoded. Here's what I do know: I've ripped most of my collection to my hard drive using KAudioCreator and I've specified that they be stored in flac format. All files play without trouble through Amarok. I found out there was a problem when I had selected files in a playlist and picked "burn"

Unfortunately, this is another "I don''t yet know ruby" question, but I''m hoping that someone can help me out. I''ve just tried to write some mount options via puppet and I noticed that, while fstab is written, the managed mounts are not remounted to effect the stated changes. For instance: Original - /home, options: rw Puppet - /home, options: rw,acl

I'm struggling with following symlinks with samba on the recent versions. I cannot use mount -bind as I've seen others suggest. This is for my mythtv backend, so I'm using the rename script to create nice names for the recordings. Anyway, I can map the drive from Windows XP and Windows 7, and see symlinked files, but I cannot open or copy them as I used to be able to do. My

On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 07:58:32PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 06.01.2016 um 19:35 schrieb Andreas Maier: > >Am 06.01.2016 um 19:28 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > >>Can't reproduce this on latest 4.3.x (and I just tried). We did have > >>such a bug, but I remember fixing it :-). What Samba version is > >>running on the Synology ? > > >

Hi list! I'm writing because of an issue I'm having with my Postfix-Dovecot installation. Everything's working fine but when an IMAP client is idle for some time, Dovecot automatically logs it out. Jul 26 14:01:16 mail dovecot: imap(nicolas at devels.es): Disconnected: Logged out bytes=1271/7439 This entails errors when trying to send e-mails after this auto logout, such as:

hey all 'scp -r ' follows symlinks. IMO this is a bug and should be changed - it: a) hampers the use of scp. As it stands, I cannot use 'scp -r' because of this behavior. If someone links to '/', or if I hit a recursive symlink, I'm screwed. b) It is inconsistant with cp. When you 'cp -r' on a file, it does NOT follow the symlink. When you scp

Hi all, Ok, I have: login_log_format_elements = user=<%u> method=%m rip=%r lport=%{lport} mpid=%e %c session=<%{session}> We only allow inbound IMAP, and only SSL on port 993. Looking at the logs, %c is obviously the encryption type, but... Why does it say 'TLS', when it technically (there is a difference after all) should say 'SSL'? Not a big deal, but it is

> On 2017.01.18, at 2:06 PM, Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 2017-01-18 13:41, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > >> OK, I give in, why didn't I get the OPs reply to my post ? >> >> On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 13:23:16 -0600 >> Matthew Delfino via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >> On

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13569 Bug ID: 13569 Summary: --link-dest may follow symlinks and failure to hard link a non-regular file is fatal Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core

Hi all, I have a samba 3 server, and I want my users from Linux to access shares on this server (like everybody:) ) . I have these directories : user1_dir for user1 user2_dir for user2 share for all On the server, I have this directory structure : /home/users/user1_dir /home/users/user2_dir /home/data/share I have a symbolic link in user1_dir and in user2_dir pointing to