similar to: NEW Samba 4.12.1 and Ubuntu 20.04 (only amd64)

Hai, So as of now, Samba 4.11.8 is available for Debian Buster (amd64/i386/armhf) on my repo. Also available Samba 4.12.2 Ubuntu Focal Fossa 20.04 only amd64. Info : https://apt.van-belle.nl How to use it : # Import my public key wget -O - http://apt.van-belle.nl/louis-van-belle.gpg-key.asc | apt-key add - # Enable the repo Debian Buster samba 4.11 echo "deb

Hai, After some feedback and current upgrades im doing im ok with these packages. So as of now, Samba 4.12.1 is available for Debian Buster amd64/i386/armhf. I've added https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14336 'net ads keytab create' doesn't add the UPN of the host as an entry In these packages. How to use it : # Import my public key wget -O -

On 14/11/2020 15:51, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 14/11/2020 12:56, Joachim Lindenberg via samba wrote: >> Sure. Here they are: >> >> root at cobra:/var/log/samba# cat /etc/apt/sources.list >> # See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to >> upgrade to >> # newer versions of the distribution. >> deb

Sure. Here they are: root at cobra:/var/log/samba# cat /etc/apt/sources.list # See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to # newer versions of the distribution. deb http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal main restricted # deb-src http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal main restricted ## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the ##

Hi, sorry I should be more specific. I'm on Ubuntu 18.04 and using the latest packages from repo.dovecot.com But these are only available for bionic, not focal. So I'm not sure if the bionic packages are working under focal. I did not notice that ubuntu original packages are on 2.3.7 now. So worst thing will be that after the upgrade to focal i need to downgrade to 2.3.7 original ubuntu

Its fixed now. I'll add an extra test so this wont happen again. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > L.P.H. van Belle via samba > Verzonden: maandag 16 november 2020 8:57 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Samba broken after dist-upgrade in > Ubuntu 20.04? >

Hi, is anyone using the "Bionic (18.04 LTS)" packages on Focal Fossa (20.04 LTS) ? I'm not sure if its working after the upgrade Hans -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20200820/b9b00da0/attachment.html>

On 14/11/2020 12:56, Joachim Lindenberg via samba wrote: > Sure. Here they are: > > root at cobra:/var/log/samba# cat /etc/apt/sources.list > # See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to > # newer versions of the distribution. > deb http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal main restricted > # deb-src http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal main

> On 21/08/2020 07:18 Plutocrat <plutocrat at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 21/08/2020 02.53, spamvoll at googlemail.com wrote: > > is anyone using the "Bionic (18.04 LTS)" packages on? Focal?Fossa?(20.04 LTS) ? > > I'm not sure if its working after the upgrade > > Not quite sure what you're saying here, but if you ran the "sudo

Hai, ? Sorry for the Delay, bit overloaded with work, but the end is near. pff, finaly.. soon i take a long vacation.. ? Well, you know the drill.. Ubuntu 20.04 focal, is next. ? For the Raspbian guys, please try how the buster-samba412 works for you and let me know the results. Rapsbian will be last to build so if you in a need for the newer versions, use/try ?buster-samba412? !! and dont

> On Aug 20, 2020, at 11:53 AM, spamvoll at googlemail.com wrote: > > Hi, > > is anyone using the "Bionic (18.04 LTS)" packages on Focal Fossa (20.04 LTS) ? > I'm not sure if its working after the upgrade > > Hans Can you tell us a little more about what isn?t working? I have the feeling that I know already, and it?s related to this:

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 03:38:36PM +0000, Joe Muro wrote: >Hi, > Hi, could you please configure your client to send plaintext version as well? We mainly prefer plaintext on this list ;-) >I am trying to understand libvirt dynamic ownership behavior. I have a VM that >uses a qcow2 image with the following permissions: > >$ ll t257kvxg-10-20-101-40.qcow2 >-rw-r--r-- 1 jmuro

On 21/08/2020 02.53, spamvoll at googlemail.com wrote: > is anyone using the "Bionic (18.04 LTS)" packages on? Focal?Fossa?(20.04 LTS) ? > I'm not sure if its working after the upgrade Not quite sure what you're saying here, but if you ran the "sudo do-release-upgrade -d" command, then it will have upgraded your dovecot packages to the current version of Ubuntu

Not that i know off, but if your on buster, your not using /etc/init.d/samba-ad-dc??and that?should have been purged while upgrading long ago already.? I recommend you check the installed packages on leftovers, and if you find them, use : apt-get remove --purge xxPackagexx You should use systemd and it services: # /lib/systemd/system/samba-ad-dc.service [Unit] Description=Samba AD Daemon

Hai, ? Debian Buster Samba 4.13 is now online on my repo. Info : https://apt.van-belle.nl/ With the release of 4.13 the following changes are going to happen in the repo's. Current (recently sended?list) OS-sambaXXXX with EOL wont be supported anymore, upgrade your OS and/or Samba versions! EOL repo's will stay online for about 6 months, that gives sufficient time to upgrade.

Hi Martin, thanks for the explanation. Now I understand why libvirt doesn't revert the file permissions back to the original. I am running these VMs on an isolated test machine, so I'll disable dynamic file ownership and make sure libvirt has access to image files. Sorry about the message formatting. I modified settings on my client, hopefully it sends plaintext now. (I'll switch to

hai, ? To explain this a bit more. All my repo's are set per os and samba version. So as long you dont change the sambaXXX version, you stay on that version and minimze risk with changes in samba. Its always :? http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian? And all you change is :??? buster-samba412? Current available versions are : stretch-samba410 stretch-samba411 buster-samba411 buster-samba412

<div class="socmaildefaultfont" dir="ltr" style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt" ><div dir="ltr" >&nbsp;</div> <div dir="ltr" ><div dir="ltr" >Hi,</div> <div dir="ltr" >&nbsp;</div> <div dir="ltr" >I am trying to understand libvirt

Hai, I've uploaded 4.12.1 to the buster-experimental repo. Im currently slowly rolling this one out in my production environment. My first server is upgraded from 4.11.7 to 4.12.0 to 4.12.1. This is my print server i started with, why print server, most easy to roll backup. 3 more servers and if im happy, i'll move the packages to the buster-samba412 repo. proxy server next

Oeps, typo below. # The "test" repo for buster samba 4.Latest, now contains #samba 4.12.1 + the depends. echo "deb http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian buster-experimental main contrib non-free" | sudo tee -a > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/van-belle.list Experimentl changed to experimental .. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at