similar to: Due to CVE in windows, disable SMB3 compression.

Hello Rowland, > cache directory = /local/samba-config/common/cache > lock directory = /local/samba-config/common/lock > log file = /local/samba-config/common/log/%m > pid directory = /local/samba-config/common/pid > private dir = /local/samba-config/common/private > state directory = /local/samba-config/common/state > You will

Hi, I saw https://blog.rapid7.com/2020/09/14/cve-2020-1472-zerologon-critical-privilege-escalation/ and https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1472 today and I am wondering what impact if any this has on samba AD domains in particular and samba in general? Is samba using the "vulnerable Netlogon secure channel connection"? Will samba continue to

The SMB3 POSIX extensions is different from the old Unix extensions. The Unix extensions can only support vers=1.0, but the new SMB3 POSIX extensions can support SMB3.1.1, vers=3.1.1. You can check this 2018 presentation slides: https://www.snia.org/sites/default/files/SDC/2018/presentations/SMB/Steve_French_SMB311.pdf Page 12 shows that POSIX extensions has been added. Page 22 shows that SMB3

Hi, I want to use the SMB3 POSIX extensions in the latest Samba (with SMB3.1.1, vers=3.1.1). By following the user manual, I have added the "posix" mount option when mounting, but it shows the following error messages. Error messages: [xxxxx] CIFS VFS: Server does not support mounting with posix SMB3.11 extensions. [xxxxx] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -95 Mount option:

On 05/10/2019 06:49, Chris Han via samba wrote: > Hi, I want to use the SMB3 POSIX extensions in the latest Samba (with > SMB3.1.1, vers=3.1.1). By following the user manual, I have added the > "posix" mount option when mounting, but it shows the following error > messages. > > Error messages: > [xxxxx] CIFS VFS: Server does not support mounting with posix SMB3.11

On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 16:14:44 +0200 Thomas Glanzmann <thomas at glanzmann.de> wrote: > Hello Rowland, > > > cache directory = /local/samba-config/common/cache > > lock directory = /local/samba-config/common/lock > > log file = /local/samba-config/common/log/%m > > pid directory = /local/samba-config/common/pid > >

Hi, I have an Informix program that unload data to a file in a samba directory. Problem is although the file has changed, I still see the old data from my Windows 98 SE PC. I only see the updated data after refreshing the snmba directory numerous times. Sometimes I have to wait for more that 10 minutes !! Funny thing is this problem does not apply to my friend's PC. Why is this so and

Hello everyone, when using samba 4.9.1 as a standalone filer, I need to start smbd and nmbd, don't I? I'm using: /local/samba/sbin/smbd -s /local/samba-config/common/smb.conf /local/samba/sbin/nmbd -s /local/samba-config/common/smb.conf However smbd. Seems to ignore my lock directory: (infra) [/local/samba-config/common] grep gencache_notrans.tdb log/smbd Opening cache file at

Hello, since we install the most recent windows updates from 07/2023 Test-ComputerSecureChannel -Verbose show False [4]. Moved the machine to local workgroup, deleted machine account on the ad controller and rejoined it (which works), but Test-ComputerSecureChannel -Verbose show again False. I'm not sure this is an issue on the samba or on the windows side. Affected samba versions so far:

I have setup an samba 4 AD DC. The Domain Administrator SAMDOM\Administrator can't create GPO (access denied). SAMDOM\Administrator is member of Domain Admins group. I have try samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --reset-well-known-acls --fix samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix without success.

Hi, I have to do a four point logistics for a dataset. All I have is the absorbance value for different proteins and need to get the four Point values. I have no idea where to start. Any suggestions would be much helpful. Thanks Ramya -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Four-paramete-logistics-tp3265251p3265251.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at

I know SMB2 support was added for the smbclient in samba 4.1.0, but was SMB3 support also added ? Is there a way to just make smbclient ? Mike

Hi all I am facing the following issue : I 've just installed a fresh windows 2003 server and want to add it to a samba 3 domain. netbios is ok on windows, I can log onto the smb server shares... but if I try to add the 2003 server to the domain it echoes the an error saying that the PDC for the domain XXX (netbios domain format, not dns) can't be found. I don't understand why

Hi, I am running samba-4.1.4 on my Fedora OS. I have provided the "client max protocol = SMB3" and "server max protocol = SMB3" parameters in smb.conf file I'm able to get only SMB2.1 packets using wireshark after fileshare access from my windows 7 machine. And not SMB3 packets. SMB2->NegotiateProtocol Response 0x0202 0x0210 Samba-4.1.4 is supporting SMB3 also. So

Hi, is there an option in samba 4.1.x to have an smbd require SMB3 encrypted transport on share level? I can't seem to find anything like it. Thanks, -- Michael Weiser science + computing ag Senior Systems Engineer Geschaeftsstelle Duesseldorf Faehrstrasse 1 phone: +49 211 302 708 32 D-40221 Duesseldorf fax: +49 211 302 708 50

On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are working alright. > > Following the smb.conf man page, I use: > > unix extensions = no > wide links = yes > > Unfortunately this still does not work for me - can you really make a symbolic link ("ln -s ...") when you are connected with smb2/3? Does

On 23.01.15 22:16, Ralph B?hme wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:08:31PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: >>> On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: >>>> I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are working alright. >>>> >>>> Following the smb.conf man page, I use:

On 23.01.15 22:37, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:23:15PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: >> On 23.01.15 22:16, Ralph B?hme wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:08:31PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: >>>>> On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: >>>>>> I

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:54:58AM +0100, Ralph B?hme wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:20:05PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:16:34PM +0100, Ralph B?hme wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:08:31PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: > > > > > > >

Hai,   ( not all on samba topic but one i wanted to share. )   I did read :  https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/LinuxCIFSKernel mainly because of, from that page, 4.7 Kernel Fix badlock regression for guest mounts (mount with -o guest can fail to Samba servers when patched for badlock). I encountered such a problem yesterday. Luckly not in the office..   The fix. Cifs.ko version