similar to: Upgrade 4.9 -> 4.11 oups

Hi All, can anyone make any sense of the error below, please advise if I need to log this as a bug but I'm not sure how to further diagnose what is happening. This is from my winbindd log file, thanks Andy. [2003/11/07 17:47:59, 1] nsswitch/winbindd.c:main(832) winbindd version 3.0.0 started. Copyright The Samba Team 2000-2003 [2003/11/07 17:48:00, 1]

Hello, I found the reason why "refuse options" is ignored on the server side. When then 5th argument (int val) in the poptOption struct is set to zero, the parsing function poptGetNextOpt() just continues with the next arg, without returning. So check_refuse_options() is simply not called in such cases. The attached patch makes "refuse options" work with checksum and

Hello, A few months ago the distribution I use (Debian Testing) moved from Samba 3 to Samba 4 - I started seeing a lot of problems. Since then there are two bugs I find occurring on a regular basis: 1. Consistent dumping core on a regular basis (very rarely, if ever occurred with Samba 3) a. $ ls -ltr *core*smbd* |wc -l b. 1297 c. $ du -ach *core*smbd*|tail -n 1

Our computers in our office ceased being able to print to a shared cups printer today. Could not find the cause. Seems the smbd processes are dying. Below is the stack trace produced by gdb bt full. The Samba 'panic action' script, /usr/share/samba/panic-action, was called for pid 5839 (/usr/opt/samba-3.0.2rc2/sbin/smbd). 0x40150a59 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6 #0 0x40150a59 in

Hi, We are having issues with our samba server running on CentOS 7. It's generating core dumps and dumping them in the / (root filesystem) directory in the form of core.##### where the # is a series of numbers. Snippets of log files and some troubleshooting commands are below. Hope someone can have a look and see if I should file this as a bug, as there were similar posts in the samba

Dear Jeremy, thanks for your reply. I assume I load the the debug symbols by passing something in the [global] section? I now changed back to a fuse_mount to get my colleagues back to work again. Tomorrow at 17 CEST I can add a test share with vfs_glusterfs to test it. Best Bene Am 09.11.20 um 17:55 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 04:01:47PM +0100, Benedikt Kale? via

Please CC me directly as i'm not on the list. I have attached a patch against latest CVS (cvs diff -u) that adds the following functionality. I can break it up if you would prefer it in pieces. Comments welcome. o add compare-perms option This creates a new inode for a file even if only the perms have changed. This way if a file outside of destdir is hardlinked to a dentry inside

On Tue, 2020-03-03 at 17:17 +0000, MORILLO Jordi via samba wrote: > Hello ! > > I decided to upgrade my fileservers from stretch/samba 4.9 to > buster/samba 4.11 > I just realized that smbd is not working anymore :-/ > If someone has an idea It would be amazing... as an idiot, I upgraded > my 20 servers.... without snapshot.... > Thank you so much > > Here's

Hi Andrew, >> I decided to upgrade my fileservers from stretch/samba 4.9 to >> buster/samba 4.11 >> I just realized that smbd is not working anymore :-/ >> If someone has an idea It would be amazing... as an idiot, I upgraded >> my 20 servers.... without snapshot.... >> Thank you so much >> >> Here's some logs : >> >> root at

Here is some news: The problem concern this 2 parameters: bind interfaces only = yes + interfaces = lo eth0 If I comment this 2 lines, smbd is starting (but not listening on localhost) We have find our problem source with Denis and figure out that package 4.11.6 from samba.tranquil.it may have been bad compiled (chroot problem ?) No problem with 4.11.6 from Louis VanBelle ans no problem with

This adds support for whitelisting the acceptable options in the "refuse options" setting in rsyncd.conf. It introduces "!" as a special option string that refuses most options and interprets any following strings as patterns of options to allow. For example, to allow only verbose and archive: refuse options = ! verbose archive The "!" does't refuse no-iconv,

Can someone point me at how the machine account plays into permitting access here? [it] path = /mnt/data/samba/data/it valid users = CUSTOMER\sgw CUSTOMER\fhäu @CUSTOMER\edv read only = No browseable = No A user out of the group "edv" uses the PC "p10013". Sometimes he gets access, sometimes not. Logs show: (a) check_ntlm_password: authentication for user [P10013$]

Hi, I have written a package that contains many s4 generic functions and associated methods. I am having a lot of trouble getting R to build the help pages for these generic functions without reporting, "missing link(s): ~~fun~~, which means that it cannot find the appropriate function when code in the example section of the help is run. Right? After some playing around I can get it to

Am 2015-12-29 um 18:59 schrieb Rowland penny: > NO! This will give you precisely 0 users > > config * == the range the 'builtin' users will be mapped to. > config customer == the range for all the domain users that have a > uidNumber attribute. If a user doesn't have a uidNumber attribute > containing a number inside the range set in smb.conf (in your case >

Hello alAl, after update of our test server to 4.12.1 from 4.11 it crashes. If the vfs module is removed from the config everthing works as before. Logs from the crash see here: .0.31:445] Apr 16 13:36:47 lx-sv-03 smbd_audit[6263]: [2020/04/16 13:36:47.546559, 0] ../../source3/lib/util.c:830(smb_panic_s3) Apr 16 13:36:47 lx-sv-03 smbd_audit[6263]: PANIC (pid 6263): vfs_full_audit.c: name table

Hello. At a customer's site I had: _ Windows 2008 DC; _ Samba 4.8 fileserver on FreeBSD 11.3/amd64 on UFS; _ several Windows and Mac clients. Recently, having to move to Samba 4.10, I decided to bring up a new fileserver in a jail (and let the base 4.8 one die after transferring all shares). I have no problems with Windows clients, but several strange things are happening with Macs.

Dear all, since a few days I have a panic error in my logfiles on my second joined DC, Samba version 4.3.4. Can anyone help? PANIC (pid 24120): assert failed: VALID_STAT(smb_fname->st) May 16 10:01:43 s4slave smbd[24120]: [2019/05/16 10:01:43.333006, 0] ../source3/lib/util.c:900(log_stack_trace) May 16 10:01:43 s4slave smbd[24120]: BACKTRACE: 30 stack frames: May 16 10:01:43 s4slave

I am trying to install samba 4.5.1 from source, as a domain controller only, under Ubuntu 16.04, with ZFS filesystem (actually inside an lxd container with ZFS backing). Out-of-the-box, samba-tool domain provision does not like the filesystem: ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): Provision failed - ProvisioningError: Your filesystem or build does not support posix

Dear List, I updated to samba 4.12.10-SerNet-Debian-9.buster from 4.12.9 and did a gluster volume set volume performance.write-behind off Now I get this in /var/log/syslog and randomly people don't get access to a shae. Nov? 9 15:56:14 ctdb-host smbd[16832]: [2020/11/09 15:56:14.078120,? 0] ../../source3/lib/popt_common.c:68(popt_s3_talloc_log_fn) Nov? 9 15:56:14 ctdb-host smbd[16832]:??

> On 29 Oct 2015, at 23:22, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 05:27:49PM +0100, Thomas Werschlein wrote: >> Hi all >> >> Since we changed our installation from Samba 3.x to 4.x (currently 4.2.5 on Solaris 11.1), we repeatedly encounter the following 'widelinks_warning', originating from Windows Server 2012 R2 RDS