similar to: Windows 10 1909 point and print restriction v2

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Windows 10 1909 point and print restriction v2"

2020 Mar 03
3
Windows 10 1909 point and print restriction v2
Hello Morillo, I have reviewed the steps described again. In fact, I had already done this several times. :D Even so, it does not map. The shared folder is mapped, but the printer is not. On windows 7 it works correctly. On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 12:33 PM MORILLO Jordi via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello Elias, > > Printing is working well for us. > Carrefully
2020 Mar 04
1
Windows 10 1909 point and print restriction v2
https://www.windows-security.org/ffeed32dc5fef8e9dbb78a867381f697/always-render-print-jobs-on-the-server ForceCSREMFDespooling = ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ If you and and i suggest you do set this in GPO. > > From a Windows 10 computer, If you browse NOT like this. > \\smbprintserver\myprinter, what > > kind of error have you ? But you use UNC like this :
2020 Mar 03
0
Windows 10 1909 point and print restriction v2
From a Windows 10 computer, If you browse \\smbprintserver\myprinter, what kind of error have you ? -----Message d'origine----- De?: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> De la part de Elias Pereira via samba Envoy??: mardi 3 mars 2020 17:13 ??: samba at lists.samba.org Objet?: Re: [Samba] Windows 10 1909 point and print restriction v2 Hello Morillo, I have reviewed the steps
2020 Mar 03
0
Windows 10 1909 point and print restriction v2
Hello Elias, Printing is working well for us. Carrefully read this page: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Automatic_Printer_Driver_Downloads_for_Windows_Clients Come back if you have any trouble -----Message d'origine----- De?: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> De la part de Elias Pereira via samba Envoy??: mardi 3 mars 2020 15:53 ??: samba <samba at
2018 Jan 09
3
Deploy software in fileserver folder
Hello list, I tried to set up a folder on our fileserver domain member, so I can deploy software for users' machines, but is not working. If I put the software inside "netlogon" it installs correctly. \\172.16.1.7\storage\programs Auth Users - read & execute, list folder contents, read and write Do I need other permissions? -- Elias Pereira
2018 Jan 11
2
Deploy software in fileserver folder
Hey Luke, thanks for the help!!! It's working now!!! God bless you and your family!! :D Remember that GPOs need to run as the context of either the computer or the > user. Computers typically do not have access to many folders on a file > server, even as "Everyone". That is why the NETLOGON folder works. > > If you're deploying as a USER configuration, then it
2018 Jan 10
2
Deploy software in fileserver folder
Which GPO? Computer or User Configuration? Remember that GPOs need to run as the context of either the computer or the user. Computers typically do not have access to many folders on a file server, even as "Everyone". That is why the NETLOGON folder works. If you're deploying as a USER configuration, then it should run as the context of the user, meaning the Everyone permission
2015 Oct 09
4
Migrate directories and files
hello guys, In my tests lab did the migration ldap base of the old samba3 to Samba4 ADCD. It's possible to migrate directories and files from users of the old samba3 to Samba4 ADDC? -- Elias Pereira
2014 Dec 22
5
Net groupmap list strange result
On 22/12/14 17:47, Elias Pereira wrote: > And now, I run the command "samba-tool user list" and the result is as > follows: > > *# samba-tool user list* > *ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb* > *Could not find machine account in secrets database: Failed to fetch > machine account password from secrets.ldb: Could not find entry to match > filter:
2018 Jan 11
2
Deploy software in fileserver folder
Hi Elias, > I thought it worked, but after I uninstalled the software that I deployed > via user scope, it did not reinstall. I selected the "Redeploy application" > option, but it also did not work. The user scope GPO are run with the privileges and access tokens of the logged on user, so the user have local admin rights for install and need access rights to the share you
2017 May 30
2
member domain idmap config ad/rid
> > Simple answer: > Administrator, No > Domain Admins, Yes Ok. It was already that way. root at fileserver:/etc/samba# getent group ... domain admins:x:10004: domain users:x:10000: dap:x:10003: dti:x:10001: For some reason with the administrator user is not working, I put my user as domain admin and include him as a member of unix and now I can access the security tab.
2024 Apr 02
1
How to diagnose a busy LDAP server process in the Samba AD DC
The saga continues... I've spent a whole day with log level 5 and 7 and no error. All I have to do is return the log to the default and the error reappears. I monitored the "LDAP Query: Duration", but I didn't notice any crashes in the queries. I don't know if it's a long time, but some queries took 1.5s. Is there anything else I can do? On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at
2024 Apr 11
1
How to diagnose a busy LDAP server process in the Samba AD DC
Hello Andrew, 1. What is the explanation for the fact that when the log level is set to 5 or 7, the NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT error does not appear, but when it is at the default log level, it does? Another point I've noticed before is that when I run the command "samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --reset-well-known-acls --fix --yes" (*Checked 15337 objects (0 errors)*), and in another
2024 Apr 02
1
How to diagnose a busy LDAP server process in the Samba AD DC
1.5 seconds is pretty long, I would look into what those queries are. I would also look into repeated queries, sometimes these things are clients stuck in a loop where they don't complete because they expect some termination condition. Andrew Bartlett On Tue, 2024-04-02 at 09:25 -0300, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > The saga continues... > I've spent a whole day with log level 5
2017 May 24
3
apt.van-belle.nl offline?
Hello L.P.H van Belle Your apt are offline? I am getting error messages while updating my distro and when I access the https://apt.van-belle.nl/ the following message appears: "Site: Unknown This site you entered is not known by this server. or did you used an ipaddress to access this server ! Try again with a correct hostname" -- Elias Pereira
2024 Mar 25
1
How to diagnose a busy LDAP server process in the Samba AD DC
Hello Andrew, What's the explanation for when the log level is set to 5, the error NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT doesn't appear, but when it's at the default log level, it does? On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 10:33?AM Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> wrote: > hi Andrew, thanks for the help!!! > > It seems to me the LDAP process being busy would be the root cause here. >>
2024 Apr 11
1
How to diagnose a busy LDAP server process in the Samba AD DC
On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 14:21 -0300, Elias Pereira wrote: > Hello?Andrew, > > 1. What is the explanation for the fact that when the log level is > set to 5 or 7, the NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT error does not appear, but > when it is at the default log level, it does? I don't have an explanation for this, sorry. ?Have you looked into the 1.5 second queries, what is sending them and
2019 Aug 19
2
interference of the nmbd service with the dhcp of the debian server??
> > Just a thought, is dhcpcd5 installed ? No. Does this happen on the XEN Server of Client (guest OS). If Xen, which xen version? xen 7.0.0 The command cat lan-dev-$(ip route | grep default |awk '{ print $5 }').network shows nothing. Do I need to create this file? His content is just my interface. Ex: eth0? On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:54 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba
2024 Feb 10
1
kcc_periodic output
Hi samba list!!! Douglas, /usr/sbin/samba_kcc is made in python. Does it have a link to source4/dsdb/kcc/kcc_periodic.c which is made in C? The errors that appear in my DCs have their output in the C code. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I read in some old posts on the list that samba would have a new code for kcc (python code?), which would be closer to what M$ uses. Could this have anything
2019 Apr 17
2
samba-tool domain schemaupgrade fails on DC member
Hello, Thanks for the feedback Garming!!! 👍 On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:35 AM Garming Sam <garming at catalyst.net.nz> wrote: > Hi, > > While I think we have most of the 2012 schema problems under control > now, there's still quite a bit of work to get the functional level > things working. In order to actually raise the level, we still need to > implement a number of