similar to: Samab 4.11.2, 4.10.10 and 4.9.15 for rhel7/centos7 rpms

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Konstantin Shalygin wrote: > On 11/5/19 8:26 PM, vincent at cojot.name wrote: >> can you provide more detail? >> >> RHEL7 has libtomcrypt but no devel rpm for it. >> That's the onoy issue I had with it. > > tomcrypt.h is required for build this package. Yes, that's the reason I've rebuilt libtomcrypt from the RHEL sources (see

Hi Konstantin, True, for 4.11.y I didn't backport the changes I made on 4.9.x/4.10.x for glusterfs. Is this what you were talking about? Vincent On Fri, 14 Feb 2020, Konstantin Shalygin via samba wrote: >> Ah, good catch! I'll update it shortly. >> Thanks > > Vincent, this issue still not fixed even for samba 4.11.6 > > > > Thanks, > > k >

On 2/14/20 8:16 PM, vincent at cojot.name wrote: > True, for 4.11.y I didn't backport the changes I made on 4.9.x/4.10.x > for glusterfs. Is this what you were talking about? I mean libtomcrypt-devel is still commented in SPEC. k

Hi everyone, I've posted some rpm builds of samba 4.11.3, 4.10.11 and 4.9.17 for RHEL/Centos 7.x (currently 7.7). The 4.11 rpms use the python3 and python3-devel rpms introduced in the standard RHEL/Centos repos at the same time as the 7.7 version. Comments and/or testing feedback would be most welcomed. http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.11.3

Hi everyone, I've posted some updated source and binary rpms following the release of updates by the samba project. Updated rpms include samba-4.10.6 and ldb-1.5.5. Here are the links: - http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.10.6/RHEL7 As usual, these work fine for me (4.10.6) but YMMV. Please do report issues if you find some. Regards, Vincent

Hi everyone, In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba 4.10.8 that I'm using on RHEL7.7. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for my SOHO). These rpms use the default python2 from the system. The 4.10.x SPEC file is now more closely aligned with upstream (Fedora SPEC file) and I've yet to test these builds using the system's python3 on RHEL7.

Hi everyone, In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba 4.8.11 that I'm using on RHEL7.6. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for my SOHO). Comments most welcomed. http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.11 If you're on RHEL7/Centos7, you've got several repos to choose from: http://azzurro.ezplanet.net/el7

On Fri, 2019-04-05 at 16:09 -0400, Vincent S. Cojot via samba wrote: > Hi everyone, > > In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba > 4.8.10 > that I'm using on RHEL7.6. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for > my > SOHO). Comments most welcomed. > > http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.10 How do you build this on

Hi Konstantin, On Wed, 10 Jul 2019, Konstantin Shalygin via samba wrote: > Vincent, excellent work! Thank you. Glad it's helping others. > Can you also provide support for rados vfs (already exists in SPEC) and > ctdb_mutex_ceph_rados_helper? That's probably doable but you'd have to BETA-test for me since I don't have a working ceph cluster at home. The information

Hi everyone, In case anyone's interested, I've posted some rpm builds of samba 4.11.1 for RHEL/Centos 7.x (currently 7.7). The samba 4.11.1 SPEC file is closely based on the Fedora Samba 4.11.1 SPEC file with some additions for using Samba as an AD/DC. These rpms use the python3 and python3-devel rpms introduced in the standard RHEL/Centos repos at the same time as the 7.7 version.

Hi everyone, In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba 4.10.4 that I'm using on RHEL7.7. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for my SOHO). Comments most welcomed. These rpms use the default python2 from the system. http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.10.7 http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.9.12 Regards, Vincent

On Sun, 2019-04-07 at 12:38 -0400, vincent at cojot.name wrote: > On Sat, 6 Apr 2019, Sérgio Basto via samba wrote: > > > > http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.10 > > > > How do you build this on Centos 7 without gnutls 3.4 and nettle 3.2 > > ? > > Hi Sergio, > that's a very good question. I built these on rhrl7.6 with gnutls- >

Hi Konstantin, Thank you for the diff. I will review it and merge it today. About the missing directories, I think it may be doable to add them to the 'ctdb' rpm. As I'm not using ctdb, what should the ownership/permissions be for those directories? Regards, Vincent On Thu, 11 Jul 2019, Konstantin Shalygin wrote: > On 7/10/19 9:49 PM, vincent at cojot.name wrote: > >

Adding Alexander (cc'ed, thank you) Hi Sergio, I found some hints (dating back almost a year ago) about why gnutls-3.4 might be needed: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2018-April/127282.html I don't know how much of this still holds true (I've been running an AD DC with rhel7's gnutls 3.3.z for over a year without apparent issues). Regards, Vincent On Mon, 8

Hi Konstantin, On Fri, 12 Jul 2019, Konstantin Shalygin wrote: > On 7/11/19 8:59 PM, vincent at cojot.name wrote: >> Thank you for the diff. I will review it and merge it today. >> About the missing directories, I think it may be doable to add them to the >> 'ctdb' rpm. As I'm not using ctdb, what should the ownership/permissions >> be for those

Hai,   I've updated the Samba 4.8.10 packages for Debian 9   Repo info : https://apt.van-belle.nl/ Build logs: https://downloads.van-belle.nl/samba4/Buildlogs/stretch/ Short version: apt-get install apt-transport-https # optional if you setup https apt repo. wget -O - http://apt.van-belle.nl/louis-van-belle.gpg-key.asc | apt-key add - echo "deb http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian

> That's probably because you don't have a system-wide install of ldb on > your system. Here's what I have on mine: > > # rpm -qa libldb\* > libldb-1.4.6-2.el7.x86_64 > libldb-devel-1.4.6-2.el7.x86_64 > > # rpm -qf /usr/include/ldb.h > libldb-devel-1.4.6-2.el7.x86_64 > I have libldb-1.3.4-1.el7.x86_64 which is the stock CentOS 7.6 version. From where

Hi All, I'm not well versed in the samba code base so I'm asking here.. :) I only wanted to run a small AD/DC for my SOHO (1 spouse, 3 kids, 1 dog & 1 cat). I've managed to build 4.10.2 on rhel7.6 with gnutls-3.3.29 and python-2.7. (this required an updated cmocka, which in turn required an updated cmake) but... building without testsuite and without clustering (ctdb) allows

This is a common error. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Bart??omiej Solarz-Nies??uchowski via samba > Verzonden: maandag 16 september 2019 14:09 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > CC: ubi >> Maciej Wysocki

Hai, ? If updated the repo's for amd64/i386 . ? Buster????samba 4.10.10 Stretch???samba 4.9.15 + 4.10.10 Bionic??? samba 4.9.15 + 4.10.10 ? No changes made by me. ? Repo info : https://apt.van-belle.nl/ ? Have fun with these.. ? ? Greetz, ? Louis ? ?