similar to: Problem in viewing server hostname when browsing network

I'm not able to use samba and vmnetnat. Please help me because this is making me crazy. I use XP on an ADSL connection. PPPoE IP is assigned dinamically. Eth0 IP can be assigned dinamically or statical *tried both* RedHat 8.0 is the guest, XP service pack 1 is the host. I also uses sygate firewall on XP *but i set allow all for testing* Linux routes via NAT and it works fine (even DNS

Single server with Samba 4.3.11. Since when we changed some shares with a richer permission set users are unable to drag and drop files into the share. They can create files, rename and delete them, but d'n'd isn't working. They never had problems in the past, it began recently. Unfortunately I cannot tell exactly what has been changed as it's administered internally and they

On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 12:04:30 +0200 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > You are meaning here, literally: windows client try to > > register/update DNS using ONLY the dns provided by DHCP? > > Or, speaking differently the same thing, windows client suppose > > blindly that DNS got by DHCP ARE AD DCs? > > Ok, DNS registration seems

Hi. We're trying to upgrade an old NT domain to AD. It's our second upgrade, and while the first was successfull this one has raised some issues for existing Windows 7 clients. If we disconnect the computer from the domain and join it back to the new S4 AD it works. Existing clients throws this error in Samba: Kerberos: AS-REQ b1rd42nbtmp648$@NT4DOMAIN from ipv4:10.0.0.42:49472 for krbt

hi , thank's for your reply . no , current DC doesn't have that GUID: samba-tool spn list zimbra$ zimbra$ ... ldap/3ecb2a51-b21d-4bef-84ed-700db7963ff4._msdcs.domain.lan samba-tool spn list landc$ landc$ ... ldap/5bf8cf1f-1e35-40c6-a20d-0abc88238d92._msdcs.domain.lan that GUID is of the machine we are trying to join to: samba-tool spn list nextcloud$ nextcloud$ ...

Hi List, I say: xm create server7 Using config file "/etc/xen/vm/server7". Error: VM name ''server7'' already exists but xm list Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 24092 8 r----- 63.2 server7 512 2 0.0 ??? Best, Mike (XEN

> Yes you can use the Ubuntu 22.04 packages if you really must, but this > will only get you Samba 4.15.3 > On the other hand, Using Samba from backports on Debian bullseye will > get you 4.17.8 and is, in my opinion, easier to use. Both for Debian and Ubuntu it's better to use Michael repos, to get consistent minor release updates: http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba/README

> samba-tool domain: no such subcommand: provision Are you sure there's no typo or hidden character? provision command is still there in 4.18.2 :) # samba-tool domain provision ERROR: No domain set! -- Lorenzo Milesi - lorenzo.milesi at yetopen.com CTO @ YetOpen Srl Corso Martiri della Liberazione 114 - 23900 Lecco - ITALY - | 4801 Glenwood Avenue - Suite 200 - Raleigh, NC 27612 - USA

Looks like a known issue when running samba as AD DC: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9673 Perhaps try logrotate service to help rotate log.samba: https://linux.die.net/man/8/logrotate -- Regards, Jones Syue | ??? QNAP Systems, Inc. On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 12:26 PM Lorenzo Milesi via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > I know about this param, I configured it and

> As I understand it, you only need Michael's repo for Ubuntu, The Debian > backport repo gets updated with the same Samba packages as his repo (or > is it the other way around ?). He is the Debian Samba maintainer. With the repos you can select several minor versions (from 4.16 to .18), while backports only contains the latest (currently 4.18) IIRC. -- Lorenzo Milesi -

Samba 4.12.1 installed from source following the wiki. I noticed /usr/local/samba/var/log.samba is not being rotated at all, it starts since the day I installed and it's still growing (500M so far). Is this something which must be handled manually with a logrotate entry? What signalling does samba require after the file has been rotated? I didn't find anything on the wiki, is it worth

> That all smells quite similar to what I were seeing > here before, and what someone else were seeing too, > all with 4.17[.4]. This famouse WERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND > error too. We upgraded one more domain, and in the hope to avoid this error, we remained on 4.16. So we deployed a new 4.16.9 DC, joined, everything is fine. Remove the old DC, upgrade OS, install 4.16.10 (which was

> which share isn't working ? > is it 'CONDIVISIONE' ? What is really weird is: Computer01, Win10, user1 logged in as local (not using domain user), share mapped with domain user. In the path I've posted in the first message the user can access BUT cannot write. Computer01, Win10, user1 logged in as domain user: same as above, user can access the folder but cannot write.

Is it possible to delegate permissions to users using (Linux) command line? https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Delegating_administrative_permissions_to_non-administrators thanks -- Lorenzo Milesi - lorenzo.milesi at yetopen.com CTO @ YetOpen Srl Corso Martiri della Liberazione 114 - 23900 Lecco - ITALY - | 4801 Glenwood Avenue - Suite 200 - Raleigh, NC 27612 - USA - Tel +39 0341 220 205 -

> By setting this: vfs objects = recycle , you have turned of 'acl_xattr'. Ouch! :( Is there a way to keep acl_xattr and recycle? Shall I specify both of them? > You should also be aware that the permissions set from Windows (you are > setting them from Windows, aren't you ?) are stored in an EA. Yes, we're using RSAT from Windows. I see ea support has been set to yes

> Can I suggest you upgrade to Ubuntu 20.04 and use Louis's repo: > http://apt.van-belle.nl/ Unfortunately it's not a viable solution in the short period... Is there any problem with S4.12 and Ubuntu 18.04? Or with the default compile options on 18.04? thanks -- Lorenzo Milesi - lorenzo.milesi at yetopen.it YetOpen S.r.l. - https://www.yetopen.it/ Via Salerno 18 - 23900 Lecco -

I never said the team does recommend it, still I don't see the purpose of saying "it's possible" when can be "fraught with problems". Maybe the wiki [1] should be more explicit on this, despite discouraging and suggesting better options it doesn't say it's highly problematic, it's still offered as an option.

> I would expect to only see that on a machine with the MIT kdc installed, > try this > > apt-get -s remove krb5-kdc > > This will prove one way or other if it is installed and what it wants to > remove along with it, it will not remove anything. Apparently nothing requires it: The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:

I am quite confident about the command I was typing. :) And I copied from yours and tried it again. == [root at dc ~]# samba-tool domain provision samba-tool domain: no such subcommand: provision Usage: samba-tool domain <subcommand> Domain management. Options: -h, --help show this help message and exit Available subcommands: info - Print basic info about a domain and the DC

> Can I suggest you read 'man smb.conf' Thanks, but on what "topic"? Is there a specific param or config you think could be relevant? > Try adding 'server max protocol = NT1' and ensure SMBv1 is running on > all machines. Is this just for SMBv1 or because you think could be related to the login problem? > Also, is the ldap server really running on port