similar to: FreeRADIUS & SAMBA when Active Directory domain is not a FQDN

Hi Rowland, Apologies for the tardy reply, I mistakenly set the mailing list to digest... Thanks for the suggestion, I'll ask the AD guys about this but I have a feeling it is an unlikely solution as Office 365 & Skype for Business apparently relies on the UPN. Unfortunately the local domain is a result of following Microsoft's "Best Practice" in the early 2000's which

On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 22:21 +0000, Steve Bluck via samba wrote: > FreeRAIDUS is checking for a username in the format of > [user]@[internet domain] for Eduroam (World wide WiFi network, mostly > used by Education), if it is not a locally defined Internet domain it > then refers the RADIUS request to a higher level RADIUS server. > However if it's our defined domain e.g.

On 12/11/2019 21:17, Steve Bluck via samba wrote: > OS is Centos 7; FreeRADIUS Version 3.0.13; Samba version 4.9.1; > > > > I'm building a FreeRADIUS box for Eduroam authentication for both SP & IDP, and have hit a stumbling block I can?t figure or Google my way out of. > > > > The issue is the local AD domain is along the lines of ?example.campus?, but users

FreeRAIDUS is checking for a username in the format of [user]@[internet domain] for Eduroam (World wide WiFi network, mostly used by Education), if it is not a locally defined Internet domain it then refers the RADIUS request to a higher level RADIUS server. However if it's our defined domain e.g. EXAMPLE.COM it will check with our AD server. Normally the sAMAccountName & AD domain pair is

On Tue, 2023-04-04 at 09:37 +0200, Kees van Vloten wrote: > Op 04-04-2023 om 00:32 schreef Andrew Bartlett: > > > > > On Mon, 2023-04-03 at 15:08 +0000, Tim ODriscoll via samba wrote: > > > > > Unfortunately it's still erroring out: > > > (7) mschap: Creating challenge hash with username: host/SL-6S4BBS3.MYDOMAIN.co.uk > > > (7) mschap:

On Mon, 2023-04-03 at 15:08 +0000, Tim ODriscoll via samba wrote: > Unfortunately it's still erroring out: > (7) mschap: Creating challenge hash with username: host/SL-6S4BBS3.MYDOMAIN.co.uk > (7) mschap: Client is using MS-CHAPv2 Is this set as a UPN (with the realm appended) on the user? -- Andrew Bartlett (he/him) https://samba.org/~abartlet/ Samba Team Member (since 2001)

Sorry if I didn't find the right manual. I would like to set up a new Domain Controller and connect it to an existing Office 365 with Exchange in a way, AD-Users of a certain group can login and not having to login to Office365. My questions: Can I map the existing Office365-Accounts to the new Domain? Is the existing username scheme in Office 365 of lois.griffin at company.com compatible

On Mon, 2023-04-03 at 15:08 +0000, Tim ODriscoll via samba wrote: Unfortunately it's still erroring out: (7) mschap: Creating challenge hash with username: host/SL-6S4BBS3.MYDOMAIN.co.uk (7) mschap: Client is using MS-CHAPv2 > Is this set as a UPN (with the realm appended) on the user? I don't see any UPN's in my AD record, only SPNs - unless I misunderstand you? I've run

On 09.07.20 18:59, Bernhard Dick via samba wrote: > Hi, > > Am 02.07.2020 um 17:23 schrieb Martin Hauptmann via samba: >> Sorry if I didn't find the right manual. >> >> I would like to set up a new Domain Controller and connect it to an >> existing Office 365 with Exchange in a way, AD-Users of a certain >> group can login and not having to login to

> I guess we have to look at the conf files then, first these two: Thank you for the config file snippets. I can confirm mine were almost identical, so I've tweaked them so that they are now exactly the same as yours except for the "--require-membership-of=example\authorization_groupname" line in ntlm_auth. Unfortunately it's still erroring out: (7) mschap: Creating

On Tue, 2023-04-04 at 07:55 +0000, Tim ODriscoll wrote: > On Mon, 2023-04-03 at 15:08 +0000, Tim ODriscoll via samba wrote: > > > > > > Unfortunately it's still erroring out: > > (7) mschap: Creating challenge hash with username: host/SL- > > 6S4BBS3.MYDOMAIN.co.uk > > (7) mschap: Client is using MS-CHAPv2 > > > > > Is this set as a

On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 13:14:35 +0000 (UTC) Billy Bob <billysbobs at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > The 'Nooooo, don't do that is: > > > > > Don't change the UPN > > > > > > > > Why not? It's a recommended best practice to choose a subdomain > > > > of your primary domain (e.g. "ad.example.com"), and

> > > The 'Nooooo, don't do that is: > > > Don't change the UPN > > > > Why not? It's a recommended best practice to choose a subdomain of > > your primary domain (e.g. "ad.example.com"), and then add alternate > > UPN suffix which allows user logons to match their email addresses. > > > > In fact, this page on the

Bonjour, It seems that freeradius 3.0.1-6.el7 of centOS 7 don't work. When doing very simple authentification (PAP control of ssh login on a switch), I get a segmentation fault when the first accounting packet arrives on the server. Does anyone test succesfully this version of freeradius ? Thanks PS: no error with the compilation of the last source version of freeradius (3.0.7) --

It seems to me that the ver of FreeRadius is 1.0.1: yum list | grep "radius" freeradius.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 installed freeradius-mysql.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 base freeradius-postgresql.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 base freeradius-unixODBC.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 base According to freeradius.org, this

Greetings list, I'm haveing problem with FreeRADIUS v1.0.1-3 which came with CentOS 4.1 FreeRADIUS refuses to use system accounts for authentication. The latest freeradius-1.0.4 is working correctly. Can we have this update or have to wail till RH release new rpm src? Thanks, -j

Hi All, The freeradius version in CentOS 5 is ancient, so I've been considering rebuilding the Fedora 10 rpm for freeradius-2.1.3 on CentOS. That means I'll have to maintain the package, and I'm not an uber packager. Normally I wouldn't care, but in this case I do because the freeradius server is going to be critical. So, should I rebuild the F10 rpm, or should I just stick with

Hi; Samba team say "It is recommended that administrators set these additional options, if compatible with their network environment:" ntlm auth = no I use samba with FreeRadius. I configure "ntlm_ auth = no" but freeradius users not connected to wifi. I use ntlm_auth in FreeRadius side.. best regards

Hello Tim, Hello samba-people, is there an uptodate guide for authenticating via freeradius somewhere? I have some Ubiquiti APs plus a Cloud Key and I want to authenticate WLAN clients via WPA2-Enterprise instead of a (shared) PSK. It seems like https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Authenticating_Freeradius_against_Active_Directory is missing some steps (basic setup of freeradius). Can you

no thats not it samba-tool does not set upn but msktutil does set the upn. So an option for samba-tool to set upn would be nice... Greetz Louis > Op 28 dec. 2016 om 18:38 heeft Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven: > > On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 17:05:39 +0100 > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: