similar to: samba performance when writing lots of small files

hi Stefan / all, resurrecting this thread ? On 9/26/19 9:19 PM, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > try to use a newer version of Samba 4.7 is already outdated. The Problem > the smb-protocol and not Samba it self. As Steve French mentioned on the > last SambaXP it will be much better with Linux 5.x. So maybe you try a > new kernel root at plattentest:~# uname -a Linux plattentest

hi jeremy / all, On 11/6/19 10:39 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: > This is re-exporting via ceph whilst creating 1000 files, > yes ? What timings do you get when doing this via Samba > onto a local ext4/xfs/btrfs/zfs filesystem ? yes, creating 10k small files. doing the same on a local ssd, formatted with an ext4 fs without any special options: root at plattentest:/mnt-ssd/os# time for s in

On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 03:18:24PM +0100, thoralf schulze via samba wrote: > hi Stefan / all, > > resurrecting this thread ? > > On 9/26/19 9:19 PM, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > > try to use a newer version of Samba 4.7 is already outdated. The Problem > > the smb-protocol and not Samba it self. As Steve French mentioned on the > > last SambaXP it will be much

Hi Thoralf, try to use a newer version of Samba 4.7 is already outdated. The Problem the smb-protocol and not Samba it self. As Steve French mentioned on the last SambaXP it will be much better with Linux 5.x. So maybe you try a new kernel Stefan Am 25.09.19 um 16:37 schrieb thoralf schulze via samba: > hi there, > > running a simple test like > > time for s in $(seq 0 9999); do

On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 01:17:03PM +0100, thoralf schulze via samba wrote: > hi jeremy / all, > > On 11/6/19 10:39 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > This is re-exporting via ceph whilst creating 1000 files, > > yes ? What timings do you get when doing this via Samba > > onto a local ext4/xfs/btrfs/zfs filesystem ? > > yes, creating 10k small files. doing the same on

Hi All I have a newly implemented two node CTDB cluster running on CentOS 7, Samba 4.7.1 The node network is a direct 1Gb link Storage is Cephfs ctdb status is OK It seems to be running well so far but I'm frequently seeing the following in my log.smbd: [2018/09/18 19:16:15.897742, 0] > ../source3/lib/dbwrap/dbwrap_ctdb.c:1207(fetch_locked_internal) > db_ctdb_fetch_locked for

Hi list, we have migrated a single node Samba server from Ubuntu Trusty to a 3-node CTDB Cluster on Debian Bullseye with Sernet packages. Storage is CephFS. We are running Samba in Standalone Mode with LDAP Backend. Samba Version: sernet-samba 99:4.18.2-2debian11 I don't know if it is relevant here's how we have mounted CephFS on the samba nodes: (fstab):/samba /srv/samba ceph

Just found my issue. After I removed the cephfs mounts it worked! I will debug ceph. I assumed because I could touch files on mounted cephfs it was working. Now virsh list works! thanks jerry Lars Kellogg-Stedman > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 04:56:38PM -0400, Jerry Buburuz wrote: >> Recently both virsh stopped talking to the libvirtd. Both stopped within >> a >> few days of

Hi, is it possible to hide/restrict access to the home drives of our samba users when accessing them directly via netbios address? I have set up the home folders in ADUC. They are all mapped to drive H: and users have full access to their drive. The problem is, that others users also have access (accept write) to other users folders when opening the domain shares via \\<netbios

I'm sending this message to both dovecot and ceph-users ML so please don't mind if something seems too obvious for you. Hi, I have a question for both dovecot and ceph lists and below I'll explain what's going on. Regarding dbox format (https://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox), when using sdbox, a new file is stored for each email message. When using mdbox, multiple

Hi, I'm testing out ceph_vms vs a cephfs mount with a cifs export. I currently have 3 active ceph mds servers to maximise throughput and when I have configured a cephfs mount with a cifs export, I'm getting a reasonable benchmark results. However, when I tried some benchmarking with the ceph_vms module, I only got a 3rd of the comparable write throughput. I'm just wondering if

Hello everyone, it's my first post here on this mailing list and I hope, I make it right. I posted a question on https://serverfault.com/questions/1031441/dovecot-as-proxy-with-submission and nobody was able to answer it. So I decided to push that question here (I'm talking about any new dovecot version and I've tested it with 2.3.4.1 (f79e8e7e4)). I try to run a dovecot proxy

Thanks Jack. That's good to know. It is definitely something to consider. In a distributed storage scenario we might build a dedicated pool for that and tune the pool as more capacity or performance is needed. Regards, Webert Lima DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* *IRC NICK - WebertRLZ* On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 4:45 PM Jack <ceph at jack.fr.eu.org> wrote:

Hi Philon, now, it's time for "Mahlzeit" ;-) Sorry, that I read the wiki1 instead of wiki2. I thought the 1 means that it is server one of ... my fault. Also not reading the first line above the menu. My focus was really on the content. ;-) Also my problem with the doc of Dovecot2 proxy is, that the document https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/authentication/proxies/

Hi Folks, is the vfs_ceph supporting quota set on a directory inside cephfs? Regards Felix -- Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH 52425 Jülich Sitz der Gesellschaft: Jülich Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Düren Nr. HR B 3498 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir. Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher Geschäftsführung: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Wolfgang Marquardt (Vorsitzender), Karsten Beneke (stellv.

Hi, i have a share called [home]. Designed like described here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/User_Home_Folders#Creating_the_Home_Folder_for_a_New_User. First i have no problems but i want to enable a trash folder for each user. At this time i have about 8000 home directories. The directorys are subfolders from [home]. Is it possible to enable a trash folder inside the home directory

I have been using the rgenoud package for a nonlinear least-squares problem with lots of local minima, and it works very well but takes lots of time. According to the article refrenced in the documentation, the original GENOUD-software by the same authors seems to allow for user-supplied analytical derivatives instead of numerical approximations, which would probably save some time. Does anybody

Hi Konstantin, Thank you for the diff. I will review it and merge it today. About the missing directories, I think it may be doable to add them to the 'ctdb' rpm. As I'm not using ctdb, what should the ownership/permissions be for those directories? Regards, Vincent On Thu, 11 Jul 2019, Konstantin Shalygin wrote: > On 7/10/19 9:49 PM, vincent at cojot.name wrote: > >

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:19:50AM +0200, David Disseldorp via samba wrote: > Hi Felix, > > On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 16:30:17 +0200, Felix Stolte via samba wrote: > > > is the vfs_ceph supporting quota set on a directory inside cephfs? > > Not at this stage. CephFS uses a non-standard (xattr) interface for > quotas, which is not currently supported by Samba.

hi there, On 07/18/2016 10:24 AM, kendell clark wrote: > I can confirm this. […] maybe debian bug #827141 is relevant … we've seen similiar symptoms, recompiling samba and friends with the patch mentioned there restored the behaviour we got with pre-badlock 4.1.17. it boils down to winbind not re-using signed&sealed connections when pulling user information from the ad, which seems to