similar to: Samab 4.11.1 for rhel7/centos7 rpms

On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 12:43 PM Vincent S. Cojot via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > In case anyone's interested, I've posted some rpm builds of samba 4.11.1 > for RHEL/Centos 7.x (currently 7.7). The samba 4.11.1 SPEC file is closely > based on the Fedora Samba 4.11.1 SPEC file with some additions for using > Samba as an AD/DC.

On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > You do realize I've been publishing .spec files and build tools for > all of this for a while now, with hooks to build for CentOS 7, 8, and > Fedora 30 with full AD features enabled for a few years now? My source > repo is over at https://github.com/nkadel/samba4repo . Yes, I am aware of your efforts. Your project is much more

Hi everyone, I've posted some rpm builds of samba 4.11.2, 4.10.10 and 4.9.15 for RHEL/Centos 7.x (currently 7.7). The 4.11 rpms use the python3 and python3-devel rpms introduced in the standard RHEL/Centos repos at the same time as the 7.7 version. Comments and/or testing feedback would be most welcomed. http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.11.2

On Thu, 2019-10-24 at 21:38 -0400, Vincent S. Cojot via samba wrote: > On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > > You do realize I've been publishing .spec files and build tools for > > all of this for a while now, with hooks to build for CentOS 7, 8, > > and > > Fedora 30 with full AD features enabled for a few years now? My > > source > >

Hi Konstantin, True, for 4.11.y I didn't backport the changes I made on 4.9.x/4.10.x for glusterfs. Is this what you were talking about? Vincent On Fri, 14 Feb 2020, Konstantin Shalygin via samba wrote: >> Ah, good catch! I'll update it shortly. >> Thanks > > Vincent, this issue still not fixed even for samba 4.11.6 > > > > Thanks, > > k >

Hi everyone, I've posted some rpm builds of samba 4.11.11, 4.10.17 and 4.12.5 for RHEL/Centos 7.x (currently 7.7). These rpms use the python3 and python3-devel rpms introduced in the standard RHEL/Centos repos at the same time as the 7.7 version. Comments and/or testing feedback would be most welcomed. http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.12.5

On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, S?rgio Basto wrote: > Hello, count with me, "my" project [1] , I have sync my spec from Nico > repo, I think the biggest difference is I'm using all internal > libraries ... Hi Sergio and Nico, I revisited nico's SPEC main samba 4.11 SPEC file last night to see if I had missed much and found huge similarities (we must have have forked

Hi everyone, I've posted some rpm builds of samba 4.11.3, 4.10.11 and 4.9.17 for RHEL/Centos 7.x (currently 7.7). The 4.11 rpms use the python3 and python3-devel rpms introduced in the standard RHEL/Centos repos at the same time as the 7.7 version. Comments and/or testing feedback would be most welcomed. http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.11.3

Hi everyone, In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba 4.10.8 that I'm using on RHEL7.7. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for my SOHO). These rpms use the default python2 from the system. The 4.10.x SPEC file is now more closely aligned with upstream (Fedora SPEC file) and I've yet to test these builds using the system's python3 on RHEL7.

On Fri, 2018-12-07 at 23:32 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote: > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 2:35 PM Vincent S. Cojot via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > So, IMHO RHEL7/Centos7 does just fine in a Samba AD/DC setup either as > > clients or DCs. I still have a few details to work out (how to move the > > Samba servers from local auth to AD auth,

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Konstantin Shalygin wrote: > On 11/5/19 8:26 PM, vincent at cojot.name wrote: >> can you provide more detail? >> >> RHEL7 has libtomcrypt but no devel rpm for it. >> That's the onoy issue I had with it. > > tomcrypt.h is required for build this package. Yes, that's the reason I've rebuilt libtomcrypt from the RHEL sources (see

On 2/14/20 8:16 PM, vincent at cojot.name wrote: > True, for 4.11.y I didn't backport the changes I made on 4.9.x/4.10.x > for glusterfs. Is this what you were talking about? I mean libtomcrypt-devel is still commented in SPEC. k

Hi everyone, I've posted some updated source and binary rpms following the release of updates by the samba project. Updated rpms include samba-4.10.6 and ldb-1.5.5. Here are the links: - http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.10.6/RHEL7 As usual, these work fine for me (4.10.6) but YMMV. Please do report issues if you find some. Regards, Vincent

On Tue, 31 Mar 2020, henri transfert via samba wrote: > Ok Thank you Andrew > > So I assume it is reasonable to install all packages listed for the CentOS8 > in a CentOS7 server , I already have EPEL repo configured. Don't install centos8 packages on an centos7 system, it would probably break some things. Instead -add- the python3 rpms for Centos7. > Our Samba 4.9 AD DC is

Hi everyone, In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba 4.10.4 that I'm using on RHEL7.7. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for my SOHO). Comments most welcomed. These rpms use the default python2 from the system. http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.10.7 http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.9.12 Regards, Vincent

Hi All, I know RHEL has bad press here but I'd like to share a different opinion (works for me) and maybe share some of my settings. BTW, Those views are my own, not those of my employer. I run a small AD at home. The setup is as follows: - two AD DCs (RHEL7.6 KVM virtual machines + Samba 4.8.7 rpms based on SPECs from TranquilIT/Fedora). - several Win10 laptops joined to the domain. -

On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:34 AM Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-12-07 at 23:32 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 2:35 PM Vincent S. Cojot via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > So, IMHO RHEL7/Centos7 does just fine in a Samba AD/DC setup either as > > >

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 8:43 AM Gabriel O. Franca via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Good morning people, > > I am opening my lab with version 4.10.2 in centos 7.6. > I'm trying to compile using python3 without success. > Has anyone managed to compile using python3 in the centos 7.6 that might > give way to the stones? > Here is the error message

On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 2:07 AM Andreas Schneider via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Monday, July 8, 2019 6:30:21 PM CEST Vincent S. Cojot via samba wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I've posted some updated source and binary rpms following the release of > > updates by the samba project. Updated rpms include samba-4.10.6 and > >

On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 2:35 PM Vincent S. Cojot via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > So, IMHO RHEL7/Centos7 does just fine in a Samba AD/DC setup either as > clients or DCs. I still have a few details to work out (how to move the > Samba servers from local auth to AD auth, etc.. mostly because it's not > my area of expertise) but it's been working fine for me so