similar to: minimum of 'server services' for NT style domain ?

On 09/10/2019 09:35, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 09/10/2019 09:14, lejeczek via samba wrote: >> hi guys, >> >> what would be an absolute minimum on the list of sevices one should have >> for NT style domain? (userdb in separate LDAP, dns too is in bind9) >> >> And maybe even less need for stand-alone server? >> >> many thanks, L. >>

On 09/10/2019 10:08, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 09/10/2019 09:47, lejeczek via samba wrote: >> On 09/10/2019 09:35, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 09/10/2019 09:14, lejeczek via samba wrote: >>>> hi guys, >>>> >>>> what would be an absolute minimum on the list of sevices one should >>>> have >>>> for NT

On 09/10/2019 09:47, lejeczek via samba wrote: > On 09/10/2019 09:35, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 09/10/2019 09:14, lejeczek via samba wrote: >>> hi guys, >>> >>> what would be an absolute minimum on the list of sevices one should have >>> for NT style domain? (userdb in separate LDAP, dns too is in bind9) >>> >>> And maybe

On 09/10/2019 11:27, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 09/10/2019 10:56, lejeczek via samba wrote: >> friendly advice: read the subjects carefully as you do with the body of >> the messages > Even friendlier advice, ask the question in the post ;-) neutral remark - everybody has, including myself, but gee man... you have some issues... to solve. cheers, L. >>> list

hi guys, I realize it's not necessarily Samba type of a question but since this community here is vast with lots of win experience I thought I'd poke - same one winstation(ver. 1903) and computer's domain users when logged in can connect WIFI no problems, only Samba domain users cannot (to the same WIFIs). Anybody? many thanks, L.

Hi dear R users: I'm trying the following code to download an information from the web. url1 <-

hi guys, I had a user (as I understand root should/must not be used for that) which is in "domain admins" group(ldapsam backend) which now(it worked for many years) with win10 fails, at Win10 end's: "The join operation was not successful. This could be because and existing computer account having name 'win7' was previously created using a different set of

Hi all, I've been working on shell scripts that allow to manage ldap accounts (users, groups, machines). They are similar to the smbldap-tools but do not need PERL to work (and so on...) and are *very* simple to configure - they may be a good alternative. The only tools you need are standard ldap client commands (ldapadd, ldapdelete, ldapmodify, ldapsearch). The scripts can be used as

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 09:12:56AM -0500, KENNETH ROY CABRERA TORRES wrote: > Hi dear R users: > > I'm trying the following code to download an information from the web. > > url1 <-

Hi There, i'm keep having problems with samba and smbldap-tools for adding machine accounts on the fly. So I'm somewhat sick of smbldap-tools and i wanted to know if someone is aware of an alternative to it. I haven't found one yet. Anyone? (except writing it myself what would be the very last alternative :) Thanks in advance Greets Patrick

On 15/08/2019 13:02, lejeczek via samba wrote: > hi guys, > > I realize it's not necessarily Samba type of a question but since this > community here is vast with lots of win experience I thought I'd poke - > same one winstation(ver. 1903) and computer's domain users when logged > in can connect WIFI no problems, only Samba domain users cannot (to the > same

Op 8/21/2015 om 1:31 PM schreef Nikolaos Milas: > On 20/8/2015 11:09 ??, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > >> As soon as I manage to re-build Dovecot with the latest snapshot, >> I'll test it! > > Hello, > > I've built dovecot with a today snapshot from hg > (dovecot-2-2-9f815e781beb) and I am trying to enable haproxy. > > I configured as follows (lines added

how to set up a file server with samba 3.5 and openldap with ssl support in debian. thanks

On 16/06/15 14:27, lejeczek wrote: > On 16/06/15 14:16, lejeczek wrote: >> On 16/06/15 13:14, B wrote: >>> P, >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:07:52PM +0100, lejeczek wrote: >>> >>>> I've barely started reading on dsync and I wonder.. >>>> would you know if it is possible to sync/replicate only >>>> specific

On 19/04/2023 08:04, wwp wrote: > Hello lejeczek, > > > On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:50:29 +0200 lejeczek via CentOS <centos at centos.org> wrote: > >> Hi guys. >> >> I cannot wrap my hear around this: >> >> -> $ unset _Val; test -z ${_Val}; echo $? >> 0 >> -> $ unset _Val; test -n ${_Val}; echo $? >> 0 >> -> $

hi everyone just a quickie to devel maybe. I'm looking at some bits: devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages? regards, L.

On 16/06/15 13:14, B wrote: > P, > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:07:52PM +0100, lejeczek wrote: > >> I've barely started reading on dsync and I wonder.. >> would you know if it is possible to sync/replicate only specific >> domain(users)? or it's always the whole lot? > See > http://blog.dovecot.org/2012/02/dovecot-clustering-with-dsync-based.html >

On 08/06/18 19:38, Phil Perry wrote: > On 08/06/18 15:54, lejeczek wrote: >> hi >> >> how do you pass vars to rpmbuild for definition? eg >> >> rpmbuild --define \'"${_definition2}"\' >> >> I've been fiddling with ways to escape, but none is >> fricking working.. >> I mean, rpmbuild rushes to work(no errors nor

Hi guys. I cannot wrap my hear around this: -> $ unset _Val; test -z ${_Val}; echo $? 0 -> $ unset _Val; test -n ${_Val}; echo $? 0 -> $ _Val=some; test -n ${_Val}; echo $? 0 What is this!? How should two different, opposite tests give the same result Is there some bash option which affects that and if so, then what would be the purpose of such nonsense? many thanks, L.

hi guys I wonder if any Centosian here have done something different than only contemplated using Fedora Server, actually worked on it in test/production envs. If here are some folks who have done it I want to ask if you deem it to be a viable option to put it on at least portion of servers stack. Anybody? Many thanks, L.