similar to: Winbind group mapping

Hello everyone, I have a small problem with dovecot installed on ubuntu-13.10. I use dovcot as LDA with a LDAP-passdb and a pam-passdb. The userdb is static. A mail to LDAP-user 'foo' is delivered with the error-message dovecot: lda(foo): Error: User foo doesn't have home dir set, disabling duplicate database A mail to the pam-user 'bar' will deliverd without this error.

Hello, i wish to get search answers without referrals this works with openldaps ldapsearch: # ldapsearch -LLLb dc=ad,dc=schule,dc=lan -E '1.2.840.113556.1.4.1339' cn=user1 dn SASL/GSSAPI authentication started SASL username: administrator at AD.SCHULE.LAN SASL SSF: 56 SASL data security layer installed. dn: CN=user1,CN=Users,DC=ad,DC=schule,DC=lan however, ldbsearch needs the control

Hi, i try to create a new machine account, like i always did, but haven't done since 3.x. My backend is ldap: passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://fileserver idmap backend = ldapsam:ldap://fileserver As root I do the following: smbpasswd -D 10 -a -m admeta --------------------------------- Netbios name list:- my_netbios_names[0]="FILESERVER" tdb(unnamed): tdb_brlock failed (fd=3) at

Hello Soeren. I've started to look at this issue and I'd agree that at first glance it looks like a libvirt issue. The 'cannot acquire state change lock' messages suggest a locking bug or severe contention at least. To help me better understand the problem I have a few questions about your setup. >From your earlier report it appears that you have 15 VMs running on the

Hello, I'm trying to join a samba-fileserver to a 4.8.4 Domain Controller. Both are installed from the Debian Unstable Sources. I've setup some scripts that allows me to provision the latest samba-version for testing purposes on two VMs. The following configs where working absolutly fine when provisioning a Samba-DC version 4.7.3 and I was able to do profile roaming, but since the DC is

Hi, I would send those, but unfortunately we did not think about the journals getting deleted after a reboot. I just made the journals persistent on the servers, we are trying to trigger the error again last time we only got half way through the VM’s when removing the snapshots so we have a good chance that it comes up again. Also the libvirt logs to the journal not to libvirtd.log, i would

Small addition again: This error shows up in the log while removing snapshots WITHOUT rendering the Vms unresponsive — Jun 01 01:33:45 mc-dc3ham-compute-02-live.mc.mcon.net libvirtd[1657]: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock Jun 01 01:33:45 mc-dc3ham-compute-02-live.mc.mcon.net vdsm[6839]: vdsm vm.Vm ERROR vmId=`56848f4a-cd73-4eda-bf79-7eb80ae569a9`::Error getting block

hai, im still on holiday but i did see some things a bit, also in addition about the smb.conf in classic mode dns forwarder is predecated, so i suggest avoiding the option. this part, you set ssl off but also set the ports to the ssl ports. ldap ssl = off ldap passwd sync = yes /etc/ldap/ldap.conf BASE dc=mydomain URI ldap://sam3dc.mydomain ldap://sam3dc.mydomain:666 use URI

I have a working setup with samba & squid on one machine. However it seems that ntlm_auth is not doing what I expected. As an unprivilegd user I am able to test succesfull password: ute at alix:~$ ntlm_auth -V Version 3.5.6 ute at alix:~$ ntlm_auth --username=hans --password=keins NT_STATUS_OK: Success (0x0) Surely I know this password. Now the same with diagnostics on: ute at

Hi, sorry to bother you: I have three AD in the domain. They all deliver different IDs: root at addc2:~# id testuser uid=3000155(EXAMPLE\testuser) gid=100(users) Gruppen=100(users),3000155(EXAMPLE\testuser),3000036(EXAMPLE\TEAM1),3000014(EXAMPLE\gesch?ftsstelle),3000001(BUILTIN\users) root at addc3:~$ id testuser uid=3000133(EXAMPLE\testuser) gid=100(users)

Hi Adam, Hi Eric, We had this issue again a few minutes ago. One machine went down exactly the same way as described, the machine had only one snapshot and it was the only snapshot that was removed, before that in the same scriptrun we deleted the snapshots of 15 other Vms, some without, some with 1 and some with several snapshots. Can i provide anything from the logs that helps ? Regards

Hi, I updated from 3.0.11 to 3.0.12 and tried the new ldapsam:trusted parameter. Alas smbd dies silently a second after startup. With debug level 2 I can't see any reason in the logfile. My smb.conf is (relevant part I hope): ================================= [global] workgroup = BBS_XXX netbios aliases = fileserver revreselif passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://localhost

>>>>> "BDR" == Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk> >>>>> on Tue, 13 May 2008 07:32:43 +0100 (BST) writes: BDR> This example does not crash in R 2.7.0, R-patched nor BDR> R-devel (r45677) for me (x86_64 F8 Linux.) It also BDR> does not crash with the CRAN build of R 2.7.0 on BDR> Windows XP. Neither does it

There are two misspellings in the german Error message for friedman test: Fehler in friedman.test.default(cont$score, group = cont$goup, blocks = cont$cont) : y, Gruppen und blöcke müssen die sekbe Länge haben The correct spelling would be: Fehler in friedman.test.default(cont$score, group = cont$goup, blocks = cont$cont) : y, Gruppen und *Blöcke* müssen die *selbe* Länge haben Instead of

You will see the current code is different, and your 'fix' is not needed nor applies in R-devel. You failed to provide an example to reproduce the alleged bug, but the issue does seem to be using lines beyond the documented line length. So it would have only affected people who did that .... And generating a new report (PR#11438) was distinctly unfriendly. If after studing the R FAQ

On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 21:07:54 +0200 Waishon via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > If it's imported here's the DC-Provision log too: > > service-samba-dc | Looking up IPv4 addresses > service-samba-dc | More than one IPv4 address > found. Using 192.168.188.2 > service-samba-dc | Looking up IPv6

OK, I am just sending it here too as it looks like r-devel at r-project.org is not the right place: =EF=BB=BFOn Fri, 2008-04-25 at 08:48 +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: > While trying to fix swig & R2.7 I actually discovered that there is a > bug in R 2.7 causing a crash (so R & swig might actually work): >=20 > the bug is in ./src/main/gram.c line 3038: >=20 >

Hi, I am in the process of migrating our windows workstations to a samba domain. Here is the problem: When creating the domain user I put every user additionalyy in the domain admin group so that he/she can copy his old files on the local profile to his new domain account. Then after this is done I put them to the domain users group but some (!) of the user the lose then access to the

Hello, my enviroment: All Servers are Ubuntun 16.04-18.04 SAMBA AD DC Server and several SAMABA DOMAIN MEMBER (connected via WINBIND). In ADDC I've created a group "restrictaccess" and added some users. Now when im typing "id <username>" on a Domain Member, for some users the group "restrictaccess" are listed for some not! For example: ON DC: #

Am 2017-09-25 um 17:18 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > as mentioned in the other reply > > DC: 100 > DM: 10513 > > - and using "id" as Louis did: > > DC # id kamleitnerl > uid=10072(ARBEITSGRUPPE\kamleitnerl) gid=100(users) > Gruppen=100(users),3000001(BUILTIN\users) > > DM # id kamleitnerl > uid=10072(kamleitnerl) gid=10513(domain