similar to: GPO not working for roaming profile server path

Yes I followed the how to, the users profiles create fine On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 11:06 AM, lingpanda101 via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 6/23/2017 12:55 PM, jacek burghardt via samba wrote: > >> Is there a script that will give roaming profiles users correct r/w >> permissions. Changing permissions by hand is time consuming is there a >> better

i've seen that is similar to your latest test. What about a gpresult -h result.html. The GPo is appplied to the user? Greetings!! 2017-11-30 13:29 GMT+01:00 Daniel Carrasco <d.carrasco at i2tic.com>: > I don't know if is relevant and maybe is the same as GPO that you've > created, but Ive a profiles folder with this configuration: > > [profiles] > path

I've created a folder for roaming profiles: [profiles] comment = Network Profiles Share path = /srv/samba/profiles browseable = No store dos attributes = Yes csc policy = disable map acl inherit = Yes read only = No vfs objects = acl_xattr Share permission and folder permission seems right, exactly as in: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Roaming_Windows_User_Profiles I've

Hello, I created a GPO Roaming Profiles redirection in my AD as shown on this page (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Roaming_Windows_User_Profiles#The_Windows_Roaming_Profile_Versions). The data are stored in a sharing file server (samba member domain). When I open a windows user session it doesn't work. Event observer says "Access denied". So I changed 'chmod 1750

OK, now i've to start to move the big part of my users from my old NT-like domains to my new AD domain. I've setup roaming profile in the new domain following the wiki (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Roaming_Windows_User_Profiles, 'using windows ACL') and for new profiles works like a charm. But i've tried to move/copy old profile to the new domain, and seems work, with

Hai, > > Hi Louis, I think you missed this: current configuration > (Samba, NT mode) > > But I think you are on the right lines, using the same drive letters > for both sites is asking for trouble. No, thats ok and should work, since i do that also but in AD dom, and you may not use persistant drives and you disconnect them at logoff. > > However the bigger

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > Is this on a DC ? No, is a DM. > If it isn't, Try setting it up exactly like it is shown on the > wikipage, note that you only need the 'vfs objects' line if it isn't > set in [global] Wikipage say only: Create a new share. For details, see Setting up a Share Using Windows ACLs. and

Hello, The GPO must be linked to the computers OU also, then the computer part will be applied too. Greetings!! 2017-11-30 14:54 GMT+01:00 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > Mandi! Daniel Carrasco via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > > What about a gpresult -h result.html. The GPo is appplied to the user? > > Mmmhhhh... seems me no. Clearly

Hi, Just a quick question about Roaming Profiles : Is there a way to force Windows to use Roaming Profils only on the share network, and without local copy ? I set Roaming Profile on a samba share with a GPO, but some users have a big profile so login is very slow Thanks Tom

Hello, The below happens with Samba 4.7.* (didn't checked with other Samba 4 versions): Setup: Samba 4.7.* AD, two domain controllers, 'computer A' and 'computer B' are Windows 10 domain members. 1. A user (login 'username') logs in into domain for the first time, on a 'computer A'. Samba DC doesn't find existing profile directory and creates an empty

Samba 4.8 (Louis debian repo), DM. Today i've had to recovery a deleted file in that share, that use 'vfs_recycle' modules: [Work] comment = Spazio di Lavoro Utente map acl inherit = Yes path = /srv/work read only = No store dos attributes = Yes vfs objects = acl_xattr recycle full_audit volume = Work full_audit:failure = none full_audit:success = mkdir rmdir read pread

I've read all docs on upgrades, from wiki to Louis notes, and i think i'm ready to upgrade. First step, move from stretch to jessie, and from 4.5 to 4.8, upgrade in place. But having a domain with 6 DCs, i'm a bit scared to upgrade all DC in one turn, and i'm think about something like: a) upgrade DC with FSMO roles, then wait 1-2 day to spot troubles b) then upgrade all DC in

On 23/09/2019 13:42, Trenta sis via samba wrote: > Thanks, ntlm auth is temporary until we have solved some issues > getent is needed by filesystem acl > If you think you need the 'winbind enum' lines so that 'getent' works, then think again ;-) If you do not have the 'winbind enum 'lines 'getent passwd username' will still work. 'getent passwd'

hi in samba/cifs/windows is there a thing similar to "su"? i'll explain: as root with "su" i can switch to another user without knowing his password i want to do the same thing, as domain admin, when i mount a share: mount the share impersonating another user without knowing his password i need it to test permissions on this share thanks in advance

It?s possible to implement a PDC without netbios service? ============================================================= M.Sc. Jos? Renato Castro Milanez Analista de Tecnologia da Informa??o/TI Analist Diretoria de Suporte a Inform?tica/Computer Support Direction Universidade Federal de Itajub?/Federal University of Itajub? Itajub? - Minas Gerais - Brasil Telefone/Phone (55) (35) 3629-1643 E-mail

Debian stretch, louis packages 4.9.16+dfsg-0.1~stretch~1 . After some time (roughly: two weeks) my DC with FSMO roles (seems that other DC are unaffected) goes suddenly on trash: memory jump from 50% (3GB) to 100%, container start to swap and slow down (load 10-15) al the phisical server. A simple restart solve all the troubles. Some hint on how to debug that? Thanks. -- dott. Marco Gaiarin

Hello, I'm running Samba 4.9.5 as domain member, when I bring down the current Window DC (10.50.50.187) the winbind seems to hang instead of switching to the other available DC (10.50.50.25) The "net ads" command show that Samba switched to the other available DC: net ads join -U 'administrator' -S 'PAVONE.HYPERFILE.LOCAL' 'HYPERFILE.LOCAL'^C root at

[ I've just asked abut that, here, but now seems a simpler things, so i retry... ] This seems NON a samba touble, but a different behaviour in M$ client OS. But, really, i've not clue how to find an answer... Suppose to have a Win7 and a Win10 machine, both NOT joined to a domain. Suppose to have a share, with guest access enabled, where only readonly access are needed. Suppose also

On 23/09/2019 15:18, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > Mandi! Rowland penny via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > >> I repeat (louder this time): NO ONE NEEDS THE 'WINBIND ENUM' LINES IN >> SMB.CONF > While it is true that i can live happily without 'winbind enum', it is > not completely true that 'no one needs' that. > > For example,

Hi all, We're a small charity and we've got a working and stable Debian 9 AD system using one Samba server (version 4.9.5-Debian) and 4 x Windows 10 Pro clients.? The server has two shared folders - "Profiles" for roaming profiles and "users" for user's home directories. We've just got delivery of two donated computers, and we got 2 new staff members.? I