similar to: Samba 4 & Thunderbird Mail Client

[ I don't think it is a samba trouble, but indeed some clue... ] A user of mine have a rather complex Thunderbird local folder email archive, in a network folder (P:\Mail), with CSC enabled (it is a portable system). Rather frequently (at least once a week) in the share a 'disk folder' (a directory) with the same name of the 'file' of the email folder get created. Because

Reding the thread in list about gluster, i've found that in your samba packages 4.5.12+dfsg-2+deb9u2~bpo8+1 there's no vfs_glusterfs module, only the manpage. root at vdmsv1:~# grep glusterfs /var/lib/dpkg/info/samba*.list /var/lib/dpkg/info/samba-vfs-modules.list:/usr/share/man/man8/vfs_glusterfs.8.gz root at vdmsv1:~# grep /vfs/ /var/lib/dpkg/info/samba*.list

Reading here i've understod that for LDAP query it is better to use SAMAccountName as 'login', but today i've found: https://docs.microsoft.com/it-it/windows/desktop/ADSchema/a-samaccountname so, 'SAMAccountName' is a compatibility field with NT mode, limited to 20 chars. Someone here use 21 chars logins? ;-) -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66

I've read all docs on upgrades, from wiki to Louis notes, and i think i'm ready to upgrade. First step, move from stretch to jessie, and from 4.5 to 4.8, upgrade in place. But having a domain with 6 DCs, i'm a bit scared to upgrade all DC in one turn, and i'm think about something like: a) upgrade DC with FSMO roles, then wait 1-2 day to spot troubles b) then upgrade all DC in

Samba 4.8 (Louis debian repo), DM. Today i've had to recovery a deleted file in that share, that use 'vfs_recycle' modules: [Work] comment = Spazio di Lavoro Utente map acl inherit = Yes path = /srv/work read only = No store dos attributes = Yes vfs objects = acl_xattr recycle full_audit volume = Work full_audit:failure = none full_audit:success = mkdir rmdir read pread

On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:51:47 +0100 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I've seen: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/PAM_Offline_Authentication > > I've tried to enable offline logon, and seems to work as expected. > > I've only found a little strange thing, i think related to the fact > that in my DM i've set

I'm starting to upgrade my domain members to debian stretch/samba 4.8, using louis packages. Domain controllers still on jessie/samba45. Upgrade went smooth, but after upgrade seems that the DM was not able anymore to retrieve rfc2307 data, eg: root at vdmsv2:~# getent passwd gaio gaio:*:10000:10513:Marco Gaiarin:/home/LNFFVG/gaio:/bin/false root at vdmsv2:~# ldbsearch -H

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... > I hope this clarifies things, Super-clear! Thanks! -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66 Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia'' http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/ Polo FVG - Via della Bontà, 7 - 33078 - San Vito al Tagliamento (PN) marco.gaiarin(at)lanostrafamiglia.it t

I need to do a simple query, against some LDAP data in 'laster draft schema' format i've added to te samba/AD schema. All LDAP query return the same result on all (6) of the DC: root at vdcsv1:~# ldapsearch -H ldap://vdcsv2.ad.fvg.lnf.it -W -D CN=mta,OU=Restricted,DC=ad,DC=fvg,DC=lnf,DC=it -b DC=ad,DC=fvg,DC=lnf,DC=it "(cn=prova123)" rfc822MailMember Enter LDAP Password:

Debian stretch, louis packages 4.9.16+dfsg-0.1~stretch~1 . After some time (roughly: two weeks) my DC with FSMO roles (seems that other DC are unaffected) goes suddenly on trash: memory jump from 50% (3GB) to 100%, container start to swap and slow down (load 10-15) al the phisical server. A simple restart solve all the troubles. Some hint on how to debug that? Thanks. -- dott. Marco Gaiarin

Ahem no one reply me. A little fast-rewind: i need to have some 'aliases' to my servers (DM); seems i need to add in smb.conf: netbios aliases = FILESV but also add a 'SPN'; trying to look around for an examples, lead me to ''nothing'', or to examples that seems to me unrelated. Supposing the domain is 'ad.fvg.lnf.it' and the FQDN of the real host is

I need to close a site. No, no people fired, i've defined sites and DC because i hope that get (re)opened, but... There's some care i need to have to remove a DC (clearly, without FSMO roles)? I've looked on wiki to 'remove a DC' but i was not able to find something... Thanks. -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66 Associazione ``La Nostra

Following: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Demoting_a_Samba_AD_DC i've demoted and removed a DC. Seems all went as expected: root at vdcud1:~# samba-tool domain demote --server=vdcsv1.ad.fvg.lnf.it -U gaio Using vdcsv1.ad.fvg.lnf.it as partner server for the demotion Password for [LNFFVG\gaio]: Deactivating inbound replication Asking partner server vdcsv1.ad.fvg.lnf.it to synchronize

In Samba/NT i was used to share mapping done in netlogon script, so users move around between sites, get home and profile from remote location but still have share mapped from local servers. In Samba/AD, using GPO, share mapping is in ''user policy'', and so user roam between sites and get different policies? I'm googling around but i'm a bit confused... i can still use

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > Not sure what you are proposing is going to work, AD expects every user > to be a member of Domain Users, even though there is nothing in AD to > show membership. Ah. > Do you require this user to visible on all domain machines ? [...] > It might help if you could explain how you are going to use your new > user

[ I've just asked abut that, here, but now seems a simpler things, so i retry... ] This seems NON a samba touble, but a different behaviour in M$ client OS. But, really, i've not clue how to find an answer... Suppose to have a Win7 and a Win10 machine, both NOT joined to a domain. Suppose to have a share, with guest access enabled, where only readonly access are needed. Suppose also

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > > But my question really is: why this policy apply, if i've not enabled > > in GPO? > Probably because GPOs have no effect on a Samba AD DC, they will only > effect Windows clients. Rowland, i'm speaking about windows clients, not samba servers! I've enabled 'complexity checks' in samba servers,

Not only NT domains, but also Samba 3.6! Wow! I'm a retro-sysadmin! ;-) I know i'm asking a rather hard thinks but... we are upgrading, but also solving some troubles. We have ''decently'' integrated some W10 1803 in a NT domain, but now with some other 1903 there's no way to make roaming profiles work. Looking at samba logs, seems that the client don't try at

I'm using samba 4.5 on a debian jessie (Louis packages). Rarely it happen that a power outgage tear down all the stuff, here. I've noticed that if the DM start before the DC, clearly all account data are inaccessible. To prevent or minimize that, the ''offline mode'' of winbind can be safely used also on DM servers? Or is tailoread against roaming client (portables,

You guys mix to things. > AFAIK is the 'privileges' that are host-specific. Is correct. >the policies are on the domain (in the LDAP data, > the root DN, look at them!). Yes, but only the GPO policies and these are not applied to the samba server. And because of that, samba-tools password settings needs to be set on every DC. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk