similar to: Container setup - selftests not running?

On 05/07/2019 21:12, Joachim Lindenberg via samba wrote: > Following my questions in https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2019-July/224115.html and the lack of recent builds of Samba in Ubuntu, I started to build Samba on my own. > I installed a new virtual machine with Ubuntu 18.04.2 (LTS) server (+ssh), installed docker and docker-compose, and then tried to build using the following

On 7/4/19 12:49 PM, Joachim Lindenberg wrote: > * I am not (yet) familiar with LXD or nspawn. Do you have any pointer on how Samba DC works with LXD? > I've only used LXD for containerizing web applications so far.

On Monday, August 7, 2023 6:05:03 AM EDT Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > https://github.com/samba-in-kubernetes > Andrew, thanks a bunch for pointing people to our org! I really appreciate it. More below... > On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 11:08 +0200, Joachim Lindenberg via samba wrote: > > Hello Anantha, Michael, > > IIRC this is somewhat optimistic or a secret sausage. For

Hi Patrick, thanks for the pointers. I tried today, and while it was easy to start my first container, I am not really happy with LXD, exactly for the reason St?phane gives in https://stgraber.org/2016/03/11/lxd-2-0-introduction-to-lxd-112/ "How does LXD relate to Docker/Rkt?"... what I really like about docker and docker-compose is, that it encourages to separate code from data and

I am building a Dockerfile and I am setting up MariaDB repos as follow: # Setup MariaDB repos RUN touch /etc/yum.repos.d/MariaDB.repo I should write this inside the MariaDB.repo file: [mariadb] name = MariaDB baseurl = http://yum.mariadb.org/5.5/centos6-amd64 gpgkey=https://yum.mariadb.org/RPM-GPG-KEY-MariaDB gpgcheck=1 What's the right way to do this? The one below? echo

On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 06:31, Keith Keller <kkeller at ...> wrote: > On 2016-01-29, reynierpm at gmail.com <reynierpm at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I am building a Dockerfile and I am setting up MariaDB repos as follow: > > This question is probably way offtopic for a CentOS mailing list. > >> # Setup MariaDB repos >> RUN touch

I am working in a Dockerfile but there is a "secure" MariaDB server script I need to run which is interactive and I don't know how to deal with this. Basically this is the flow I have follow on the script at test environment and is the same I want to achieve in the Dockerfile without user interaction by just answering as you seen on the flow below: #

On 7/3/19 8:21 AM, Sven Schwedas via samba wrote: > Though I'm not sure if docker is the right tool for the job; samba as a > fat daemon running a bazillion subprocesses orchestrated by a persistent > database that's very sensitive to instances leaving and joining the > domain seems the antithesis to docker's philosophy. > Docker would be a terrible choice for this;

I continue to receive an error installing R via dockerfile on a buster image python:3. E: The value 'buster-cran40' is invalid for APT::Default-Release as such a release is not available in the sources My starting point is the debian buster based Python:3 image adding a couple of python specific configurations and then using the commands in the R project documentation for installing R on

My dockerfile: FROM python:3 WORKDIR /usr/src/app COPY requirements.txt ./ COPY languageserver-master ./ COPY radian-master ./ RUN pip3 install --no-cache-dir -r requirements.txt EXPOSE 8080 RUN apt-key adv --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key 'E19F5F87128899B192B1A2C2AD5F960A256A04AF' RUN echo "deb http://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/debian buster-cran40/" >>

I run DCs in containers. LXC, privileged, on proxmox. On Jul 24, 2024 at 09:19 +0200, Joachim Lindenberg <samba at lindenberg.one>, wrote: > > Therefore I wished, Samba-Ad-Dc were able to run as a container

I have to support a legacy build that runs on CentOS 6. I?m new to Docker and would like to use the official CentOS 6.10 image (https://github.com/CentOS/sig-cloud-instance-images/blob/da050e2fc6c28d8d72d8bf78c49537247b5ddf76/docker/Dockerfile <https://github.com/CentOS/sig-cloud-instance-images/blob/da050e2fc6c28d8d72d8bf78c49537247b5ddf76/docker/Dockerfile>) as a Docker container on

Hmm? It?s picking up the pre-made binary from ppa:marutter/rrutter4.0 using apt-get install. Isn?t it what Lauren?s trying to do? From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> Date: Monday, July 8, 2024 at 11:57?AM To: marcoblanchette at icloud.com <marcoblanchette at icloud.com> Cc: Gerber, Lauren J <lauren.gerber at helsinki.fi>, r-sig-debian at r-project.org <r-sig-debian

On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 16:48:59 +0200 Joachim Lindenberg via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello Rowland, > there can be a lot more services than just the OS and Samba-AD-DC. Just like Microsoft, Samba doesn't recommend using a DC for other services and running it in some form of VM doesn't make it different. > As > a must have you have to configure bind, and

Am 03.09.18 um 15:12 schrieb Robert Marcano via samba: > On 09/03/2018 04:10 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >> >> As I am learning docker lately I came to the idea of using a docker >> container as a "fallback" DC at sites where there is no budget (or >> understanding) for a 2nd physical DC. >> >> That 2nd DC *might* run as docker

Hi everybody. Just wanted to mention that I've published a docker image of tinc 1.1pre15 for the raspberry pi 2/3. It was compiled from source on a raspberry 3 and published as byscontrol/tinc-rpi <https://hub.docker.com/r/byscontrol/tinc-rpi/> along witht the configuration instructions. The latest tag refers to 1.1pre15 only, but I can publish other versions as well if needed. Hope

Hi: I have a Dockerfile, which builds an image which installed R 3.3.2 in Ubuntu 14.04, but building using that Dockerfile seems to have stopped working and I am unclear why. I believe the relevant error is: Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet

Hi Dirk, Thank you so much for looking into this when you got home. I greatly appreciate it. I was actually in the midst of writing to everyone the following message: ?. ?. ?. Hi All, I have some good news. ? My docker image is now up-to-date with R version 4.4.1. I first had to clear a bunch of unused data using docker system prune ?force. Apparently, it cleared over 32.53 gigs of data, and

Hi Marco, Thank you for the follow up email. In the line below, do I replace $(lsb-release -cs) with jammy (Ubuntu 22.04) or leave it alone: Add-apt-repository ?deb https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu jammy-cran40/? It?s good to know about installations for Bioconductor. I am not currently using it, but I may need it in the future for other projects. Br, Lauren -- Lauren J. Gerber

Yes, keep the $(lsb-release -cs) there. This allows you to change the version of the OS without having to change anything else (for instance we are migrating all of our docker to 24.04 LTS right now, so we only have to modify the FROM entry and all of our Dockerfile will still work). From: Gerber, Lauren J <lauren.gerber at helsinki.fi> Date: Thursday, July 11, 2024 at 2:21?AM To: