similar to: [Announce] Samba 4.9.10 Available for Download

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "[Announce] Samba 4.9.10 Available for Download"

2019 Jul 02
3
[Announce] Samba 4.9.10 Available for Download
Quick update, I checked ldb-1.4.x to ldb-1.6.x and couldn't find an LDAP_REFERRAL_SCHEME defined anywhere. (Perhaps it's in an un-released version). So, for now a copy of the define from ldb_module (source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/ldb_module.h) will do, I guess: # cat samba-4.9.10-ldb-scheme.patch *** samba-4.9.10/source4/include/includes.h.orig 2019-07-02 14:47:43.008208717
2019 Jul 02
0
[Announce] Samba 4.9.10 Available for Download
Hi, While trying to compile 4.9.10 on RHEL7.6, I got the following error: [1845/4160] Compiling source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/update_keytab.c ../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/partition.c: In function 'partition_search': ../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/partition.c:906:14: error: 'LDAP_REFERRAL_SCHEME_OPAQUE' undeclared (first use in this function) ldb,
2019 Jul 02
0
[Announce] Samba 4.9.10 Available for Download
On Tue, 2019-07-02 at 14:50 -0400, Vincent S. Cojot via samba wrote: > Quick update, I checked ldb-1.4.x to ldb-1.6.x and couldn't find an > LDAP_REFERRAL_SCHEME defined anywhere. (Perhaps it's in an un- > released > version). > > So, for now a copy of the define from > ldb_module (source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/ldb_module.h) will do, I > guess: > > # cat
2010 Mar 13
1
Compile problem: "lib/ldb/ldb_map/ldb_map.h", line 64: syntax error before or at: 0x20
Trying to compile samba source4. Anybody have any ideas? Here's the error: With gcc, version 3.4.3, I get: Compiling lib/ldb/ldb_map/ldb_map_inbound.c In file included from lib/ldb/ldb_map/ldb_map_inbound.c:28: lib/ldb/ldb_map/ldb_map.h:64: error: syntax error before numeric constant The following command failed: gcc -O2 -m64 -g -DDEBUG_PASSWORD -DDEVELOPER -Wall -Wshadow
2019 Jun 10
6
please confirm: sssd not a good idea :)
On 08/06/2019 21:32, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 08/06/2019 16:24, Uwe Laverenz via samba wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> when you join a linux server to an active directory with "realm" it >> uses "sssd" as default. This works well as long as you just want to >> be a simple domain member. >> >> As soon as you want a real member
2019 Jun 10
3
please confirm: sssd not a good idea :)
On 10/06/2019 16:04, vincent at cojot.name wrote: > > There is probably some amount of redtape on this but AFAIK it works > fine for me: My RHEL7.6 hypervisors are joined to my AD DC 4.10.4 VMs > through use of realm '(and thus sssd): > > Here's a RHEL7.6 client: > # realm list > ad.lasthome.solace.krynn > ? type: kerberos > ? realm-name:
2020 Aug 21
3
Problem with secondary DC
On Thu, August 20, 2020 16:14, Rowland penny wrote: > On 20/08/2020 20:40, James B. Byrne via samba wrote: >> FreeBSd-12.1p8 >> Samba-4.10.15 >> >> >> I have this problem: >> >> samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs >> Searching for dsServiceName in rootDSE failed: operations error at >> ../../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/rootdse.c:518 >>
2018 Dec 06
5
RHEL7/Centos7 with Samba AD
Hi All, I know RHEL has bad press here but I'd like to share a different opinion (works for me) and maybe share some of my settings. BTW, Those views are my own, not those of my employer. I run a small AD at home. The setup is as follows: - two AD DCs (RHEL7.6 KVM virtual machines + Samba 4.8.7 rpms based on SPECs from TranquilIT/Fedora). - several Win10 laptops joined to the domain. -
2017 Dec 13
2
Replication issue (maybe due to 4.7.0 bug?)
On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 11:37 +0100, Gaetan SLONGO wrote: > Hi Andrew. > > Any idea to solve this ? You need to turn up the logs on the destination server until you get more useful log entries leading up to: ==> /var/log/samba/log.samba <==  [2017/12/07 10:10:55.825907, 0] ../source4/dsdb/repl/drepl_out_helpers.c:942(dreplsrv_op_pull_source_ap ply_changes_trigger)  Failed to
2015 Nov 06
2
Join Samba without GC role
It's strange. We have root domain and a lot subdomain. We try to join Samba to one of subdomain. Active Directory DB (NTDS.dit) without GC = 1.2 Gb, with GC=16 Gb. When we try to join Samba we have samba DB limit 4Gb. We see that samba replicate information about all domains in forest: descriptor_sd_propagation_recursive: DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=domain1,DC=oao,DC=company not found under
2014 Jan 10
3
Samba 4 RPC hangs after a while
Hello all, ? this is my first Post in a Mailing List I hope everything goes fine. ? We are running a Samba 4 DC (4.0.14, Version 4.1.4 has the same problem) as a second DC in our Windows Environment. This server is in a second site. ? So after a while Samba 4 hangs and it is not possible to talk to the server via the RPC Protocol. So all samba-tools Commands like ?samba-tool drs showrepl? run
2015 Nov 02
2
Join Samba without GC role
Thanks for the answer! Is that true if we have Subdomains, Samba write to DB information only about join-domain? And what option --domain-critical-only do? I did not see the difference - with or without. -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abartlet at samba.org] Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2015 12:14 PM To: Luchko Dmitriy <Luchko.D at digdes.com>; samba at
2019 Apr 05
2
Samba 4.8.10 for Debian 9 is now available (amd64/i386)
Hai,   I've updated the Samba 4.8.10 packages for Debian 9   Repo info : https://apt.van-belle.nl/ Build logs: https://downloads.van-belle.nl/samba4/Buildlogs/stretch/ Short version: apt-get install apt-transport-https # optional if you setup https apt repo. wget -O - http://apt.van-belle.nl/louis-van-belle.gpg-key.asc | apt-key add - echo "deb http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian
2019 Jul 02
1
[Announce] Samba 4.9.10 Available for Download
> That's probably because you don't have a system-wide install of ldb on > your system. Here's what I have on mine: > > # rpm -qa libldb\* > libldb-1.4.6-2.el7.x86_64 > libldb-devel-1.4.6-2.el7.x86_64 > > # rpm -qf /usr/include/ldb.h > libldb-devel-1.4.6-2.el7.x86_64 > I have libldb-1.3.4-1.el7.x86_64 which is the stock CentOS 7.6 version. From where
2019 Apr 15
2
cutting corners (4.10.2 on el7.6)
Hi All, I'm not well versed in the samba code base so I'm asking here.. :) I only wanted to run a small AD/DC for my SOHO (1 spouse, 3 kids, 1 dog & 1 cat). I've managed to build 4.10.2 on rhel7.6 with gnutls-3.3.29 and python-2.7. (this required an updated cmocka, which in turn required an updated cmake) but... building without testsuite and without clustering (ctdb) allows
2018 Mar 16
3
samba 4.7->4.8 in place upgrade
Hi, I'm testing the in-place upgrade from 4.7.5 samba to 4.8 and unfortunately it breaks. After the upgrade samba seems to have trouble to find his way through the db: ------------------ #ldbsearch -V Version 4.8.0 #ldbsearch -H private/sam.ldb Unable to determine the DomainSID, can not enforce uniqueness constraint on local domainSIDs search error - No such Base DN: DC=example,DC=com
2019 Apr 08
3
Samba 4.8.11 for rhel7/centos7 rpms
Hi everyone, In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba 4.8.11 that I'm using on RHEL7.6. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for my SOHO). Comments most welcomed. http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.11 If you're on RHEL7/Centos7, you've got several repos to choose from: http://azzurro.ezplanet.net/el7
2018 Dec 06
2
Can't configure GDM after update to CentOS 7.6
Hi, It looks like the upgrade to CentOS 7.6 has been unusually disruptive with the GNOME desktop version bump and a series of moving targets under the hood. The result is some wreckage at my client's desktop installations, which I've been busy to repair since yesterday. First things first. I have a custom configuration of GDM, which consists mainly of two things. 1. Display my
2018 Apr 26
2
[BUG] Fail update Samba 4.8.0
As guidance, we look forward to Samba 4.8.1 for upgrade. However, the same bug remains in version 4.8.0 Again I will go back to the previous version (4.7.5) Does anyone else share this problem? samba4.service - LSB: start and stop samba4 Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/samba4; bad; vendor preset: disabled) Active: active (running) since Thu 2018-04-26 16:32:31 -04; 6 minutes ago
2019 Oct 23
1
vfs_fruit & resource forks on macOS
> On 23 Oct 2019, at 18.54, Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org> wrote: > > On 10/23/19 4:31 PM, Perttu Aaltonen via samba wrote: >> From version 4.10.6 onwards folder icons are not working anymore on macOS. I can see the "._Icon?? file written on disk but seems like Samba isn?t reading it back and presenting it to the client. Is there a change or new setting that is needed