similar to: gencache.tdb: device busy

Hi Jeremy,   I got some info on that topic from the illumos devs:   > It's a sporadic issue, you're lucky enough to not encounter it on 4.9.5. > > I confirmed in 4.10.2, it happens: > > winbindd.log:  tdb(/tmw-nas-3p/samba/var/lock/gencache.tdb): tdb_open_ex: tdb_mutex_init failed for /tmw-nas-3p/samba/var/lock/gencache.tdb: Device busy > > So either apply OS fix, or

Release Announcements ===================== This is the third release candidate of Samba 4.12. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.12 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the third release candidate of Samba 4.12. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.12 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

I added LOG statements to mutex.c printing the strerror from the return values.   From   ret = pthread_mutexattr_init(&ma); in line 570   I got errorno 16 --> device busy.   But due the manual of pthread_mutex_attr_init() there should only be ENOMEM and EINVAL...   Doing gdb smbd -> run Doe not reveal anything, but I never used gdb for debugging anything. I just gave it a shot...        

A little summary of building Samba 4.12.0rc3 on OmniOS: The following 4 (5) small patches are needed in order to compile and run Samba 4.12.0rc3 on the latest OmniOS r151032p (OpenSolaris/Illumos variant): 1. ARRAY_SIZE is already defined in <sys/sysmacros.h> on OmniOS, put an #ifndef around it in lib/replace/replace.h (can be ignored but causes a gazillion compiler warnings :-):

Good morning in the Lord Regarding the port of libtheora1.1beta3 for OpenBSD for amd64 and the problem I described at: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/theora/2009-August/002640.html Attached is a patch for libtheora/patches/patch-lib_x86_mmxencfrag_c I can play videos with it. ?Does it work for you? Best regards -- Dios, gracias por tu amor infinito.

Hi everyone, I'm having an odd issue with a Samba install - it starts SIGABORTing complaining that gencache.tdb has gone missing.. ie [2007/08/09 12:52:50, 0] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_log(662) tdb(/var/db/samba/gencache.tdb): tdb_reopen: open failed (No such file or directory) [2007/08/09 12:52:50, 0] smbd/server.c:open_sockets_smbd(572) tdb_reopen_all failed. If I recreate it and restart

I have this warning when I mount MS Windows shares, tunneling SMB over SSH in order to create a VPN-like shares management. Here the steps: # ssh -2 -N -L 445:shares_server:445 user@shares_server And after creating the port forwarding: # smbmount //share_server_netbios_name/share_directory /mnt/Samba -o username=user%pass,ip=127.0.0.1 On the shares_server runs a MS Windows XP Professional,

Hi, When mounting a drive on a Samba server version - 3.0.24-6etch10 with smbmount //127.0.0.1/sagedata3 testmnt -o username=rbailey%password I get the warning namecache_shutdown: Couldn't close namecache on top of gencache. which makes no sense to me and apart from a couple of other postings reporting the error does not appear much in Google searches. Obviously, we prefer things to

Dear all, Hi. I'm a Samba user from Taiwan. I'm running Samba 3.0.23, Debian GNU/Linux 3.1r2, Linux kernel 2.6.16.14, gcc 3.4.4. I encounter the following strange message when using smbmount: imacat@rinse ~/tmp % smbmount //cotton/share ~/tmp/cotton added interface ip=192.168.0.1 bcast=192.168.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Got a positive name query response from 127.0.0.1 (

For what it’s worth you are not alone in seeing similar problems with Samba and gencache. Our site has some 110K users (university with staff & students (including former ones), and currently around 2000 active (SMB) clients connecting to 5 different Samba servers (around 400-500 clients per server). When we previously just let things “run” gencache.tdb would grow forever and authentication

> For what it’s worth you are not alone in seeing similar problems with Samba and gencache. > > Our site has some 110K users (university with staff & students (including former ones), and currently around 2000 active (SMB) clients connecting to 5 different Samba servers (around 400-500 clients per server). When we previously just let things “run” gencache.tdb would grow forever and

On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 11:59:04AM +0200, Francesco Malvezzi wrote: > Il 04/09/18 06:00, Volker Lendecke ha scritto: > > Hi! > > > > Technical description below, but the exec summary is: Yes, we have a > > performance problem with gencache. > > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:28:05AM +0200, Francesco Malvezzi via samba wrote: > >> Hi all, >

I run smbd 4.18.8 inside a docker container via "smbd --foreground" (see the attached config). Recently my server was abruptly restarted due to a power outage. Upon the restart it was able to successfully start the container, but the shares became inaccessible due to smbd rejecting all authentication attempts. In the logs I found: [2024/03/18 08:22:50.790021, 5]

List, I have a client PC that is able to connect to my network via a VPN tunnel. When the client PC comes back to the mother ship, it acquires an ordinary network address via DHCP. In this situation, the PC is currently having problems viewing Samba printers... the printer folder takes several minutes to open all the printers, and requesting a print from an application takes a couple of minutes

The config looks ok, thats great. :-) Its not needed to stop samba running : net cache flush If you run: net cache list and have a look, then flush it and look again. You see its empty. If you need to copy the idmap than it is needed to stop samba. Can you show me an output of. dpkg -l | egrep "tevent|tdb|ldb|talloc|cmocka" Im running latest versions of these. Own compile or

I’m going to try to upgrade from 4.7.6 to 4.7.7 on one of our servers soon and see if things break or not. With 4.7.6 things are stable at least. Our file servers are in a Microsoft Windows domain (consisting of 6 Microsoft Windows 2016 AD servers). The graphs (logarithmic time scale) below are login times from a probe station that times a connect using “smbclient” with a Kerberos ticket and

On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 15:13:10 +0200 Peter Eriksson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I’m going to try to upgrade from 4.7.6 to 4.7.7 on one of our servers > soon and see if things break or not. With 4.7.6 things are stable at > least. > > Our file servers are in a Microsoft Windows domain (consisting of 6 > Microsoft Windows 2016 AD servers). > > >

Hi! Technical description below, but the exec summary is: Yes, we have a performance problem with gencache. On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:28:05AM +0200, Francesco Malvezzi via samba wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a midsize AD domain with some 50k users but only 100 workstations > joined. > > Sometimes I find server CPU throttling at 100%. In order to let it drop Can you find out

Unfortunately I didn’t seem to have saved one of those big gencache.tdb files (we don’t currently see them). Or at least I can’t seem to find them now… A while ago when we first discovered this I posted a message: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2017-December/212577.html <https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2017-December/212577.html> I now notice that I never replied to a