similar to: best upgrade path

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 10:22 AM Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Not sure what you mean by 'AD and/or member file server', they are the > same thing really, unless 'AD' is a massive typo for 'DC'. In which > case, the answers are, no, you shouldn't upgrade a DC directly from > 4.6.x to 4.10.0, though you can do it in

On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 10:44:26 -0400 Sonic <sonicsmith at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 10:22 AM Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > Not sure what you mean by 'AD and/or member file server', they are > > the same thing really, unless 'AD' is a massive typo for 'DC'. In > > which case, the

On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 14:29:32 +0200 Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 at 14:22, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 13:55:18 +0200 > > Viktor Trojanovic via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 at 17:45, L.P.H. van Belle

Hi All, I started using Samba as an AD DC on el7 a few weeks ago. I have some questions for others who mights also be using Wing's rpms on el7 (http://wing-net.ddo.jp/wing). A) Is there a wiki/issues page for that repo? I could not find any.. B) is that the only repo of samba rpms available for el7/centos7? C) Is there a reason why samba46-4.6.14 is the latest available version? Are

Hi Previous: CentOS 6.X, samba4.x86_64 4.2.10-15.el6 Now: CentOS 7.6.1810, samba 4.8.3-4.el7 When I start smb, nmb or winbind I get no errors at all. This is all I get: May 24 22:44:04 HOST systemd[1]: Starting Samba SMB Daemon... May 24 22:44:05 HOST systemd[1]: smb.service: main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE May 24 22:44:05 HOST systemd[1]: Failed to start Samba SMB

Dear All, I'm using gentoo as samba AD DC but was having issue with ldbedit or ldbsearch. And some small glitch. Can help to advise a better distro to use as an AD DC? Thank you. Regards, Chan Min Wai

Rowland, I found something related that you were doing. "[PATCH] samba-tool: Easily edit a users object in AD" Did you finish the script? On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 1 Dec 2017 15:00:39 -0200 > Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks Rowland for the quick answer!! :)

I'd like to share the results of a little experiment I did yesterday. On an Arch Linux box on which in December I tried, and failed, to upgrade from 4.7.4. to 4.9.4 and then had to revert back to 4.7.4, yesterday I did the upgrade to the new 4.10 release. This time, everything worked, I had no errors whatsoever. So, I then made a backup of the new installation, in 3 different ways: Online

Dear all, I have a problem with our samba installation and really need your input since I'm running out of ideas. Short story: UidNumbers on a DC have a strange behaviour Longer Story: 1) Self compiled samba ad-dc now on V4.8.5 (recently and painlessly upgraded from 4.6.14) +bind9 +dhcp on debian stretch mostly managed through RSAT 2) 2 DC's + 3 linux (debian/ubuntu) +20ish win10 clients

Sorry for all these replies, i missed this. > Is the upgrade path from samba 4.6 + libldb 1.1 to samba 4.6 + libldb 1.3 No, that wil break your samba!!! Samba 4.6 max 1.1.29 for ldb. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Vincent S. Cojot via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 18 april 2018 14:06 >

On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 13:55:18 +0200 Viktor Trojanovic via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 at 17:45, L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> > wrote: > > > > you can upgrade from 4.7 to 4.9. > > but you must run samba-tool dbcheck > > that should work also. after the check run samba-tool dbcheck > > --reindex > > I

I am trying to compile R under a new setup, and frankly, I have had a lot of problems, but I think the stuff below points to a possible bug in R's (custom) configure checks for C++11/14/17, but not for C++98. This is a report about R from the R-3-6 branch, with a svn checkout from today, revision r77135. In my case the compiler name is x86_64-conda_cos6-linux-gnu-g++, not g++. I denote this

Hi! I am running samba 4.6.16 in Ubuntu 18.04 all ok, after ugrade to Samba 4.10.6, in running test smbclient //localhost/netlogon -UAdministrator -c 'ls' show me erro: NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_DB_CORRUPTION so I demoted dc e and installed 4.6 and upgraded to 8.3 (same versions of my other samba dcs on the network), and all ok again. existe any problem in update dc 4.6 to 4.10 or 4.8 to

Hi Sambassadors, I would like to setup one machine that acts as AD Controller, File Server, DNS, and DHCP servers. I have read the warning against having AD Controller + File Server on the same machine and those are understood. This is for a very small environment, so I'm ok with the single point of failure. That said, I have the AD Controller setup and tested (Very cool!) I've

Hi List, it appears that for the third or fourth time now, I''ve asked a question that nobody seems to respond to. Other questions (often things that could quite easily have been extracted by searching with Google or from api.rubyonrails.org) are answered almost momentarily. I''ve to admit I''m more than a little frustrated by this, so have to ask myself if it was my own

I just removed GSoC 2017 from the Table of Content. I guess it is what Praveen meant. S 2018-03-18 20:08 GMT+01:00 Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > Hello > > This is already done. All the relevant projects from 2017 were moved to 2018. > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 7:12 PM, Praveen Velliengiri via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>

On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 21:07:57 +0100 Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Am 14.02.19 um 20:56 schrieb Gregory Sloop via samba: > > And yes, I get that doesn't really solve the distro upgrade > > problem, but if it was a given that you could spin up a new DC and > > sync, then transfer FSMO roles - well that would go a long way to

On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 12:49:26 +0200 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Mandi! L.P.H. van Belle via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > > Im pretty sure this is a bug in the DC part. > > Ahem, sorry, but i'm lost in following this therad. I've hust setup my > test domain, using samba 2:4.5.8+dfsg-2+deb9u1~bpo8+1 (your package,

Hai Rowland, Im pretty sure this is a bug in the DC part. I'll show. On the DC. dc1:~# getent passwd winadmin NTDOM\winadmin:*:10000:100::/home/users/winadmin:/bin/bash wbinfo --group-info="Domain Users" NTDOM\domain users:x:100: id winadmin uid=10000(NTDOM\winadmin) gid=100(users) groups=100(users),3000004(BAZRTD\group policy creator owners),3000008(NTDOM\domain admins)

Dear All, I've some question. When I create new users/groups in AD DC. It seem that I still need to add UID and GID in unix attribute. Possible my setup on rfc2370. So I would like to check if there is any other way to do this without configuring UID and GID? Thank you. Regards, Chan Min Wai