similar to: Samba Crash on File Access

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Samba Crash on File Access"

2018 Nov 08
0
Crashes on File Access - Post Solaris Patching
I recently patched my Solaris server and suddenly my Samba service is not working correctly. When Anyone accesses a samba share the samba daemon panics and shuts down. Solaris than restarts the system, unless there are multiple panics simultaneously than the service is placed in maintenance mode. The SAMBA server is a stand alone supporting a dozen end users for a large file store behind the
2009 Jan 29
1
Problem building Samba 3.3 on Solaris 10
Hi, I attempted to build v3.3 using Sun Studio 12, but it failed right out of the gate. It looks like it can't find the standard libraries, but according to the make output, it's looking in the right places. Would someone please clue me in as to what I'm missing? Thanks. -John Using FLAGS = -I/opt/heimdal/include -I/usr/sfw/include/openssl -g -xs -xtarget=ultraT1
2005 Apr 22
0
[LLVMdev] tabs
I found 179 more *.{c,cpp,h} files with tabs. Unfortunately, the tabs stops used vary so blindly expanding them messes up alignment in many cases :( Index: examples/BFtoLLVM/BFtoLLVM.cpp Index: include/llvm/AbstractTypeUser.h Index: include/llvm/GlobalVariable.h Index: include/llvm/InstrTypes.h Index: include/llvm/IntrinsicInst.h Index: include/llvm/ADT/PostOrderIterator.h Index:
2007 Jan 11
1
Build problems with non-standard location of mysql libs
Overall the build process for dovecot is very clean. I did however run into a significant problem when it came to locating the mysql libraries, especially when building a 64 bit executable but similar problems occured building a 32 bit executable. I am describing the 64 bit build issues below since that is the worst case scenario. Fixing the 64 bit build will automatically fix the 32 bit
2006 Apr 21
1
Linker problem in installing 64-bit R
Hi, I am trying to compile R-2.2.1 on Solaris 2.9 with a 64-bit build. Following the instructions in "R Installation and Adminstration", I changed the following settings in "config.site": CC="gcc -m64" F77="g77 -64" CXX="g++ -m64" LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib/sparcv9 -L/usr/local/lib" But I got the following error messages:
2002 Sep 20
1
Install with 64-bit GCC 3.2 (PR#2048)
Hi, been trying to build R-1.5.1 for som eof our users here. No probs with gcc-3.2 32-bit installtion, but thought we'd try it with the 64-bit just for the crack. Configuring thus CC=gcc3 CFLAGS="-m64" CXX=g++3 CXXFLAGS="-m64" F77=g773 FFLAGS="-m64" LDFLAGS="-m64 -L/usr/local/packages/gcc-3.2/lib/sparcv9" ./configure
2010 Feb 03
2
[LLVMdev] [patch] SPARCV9 subtarget support
On 03/02/2010, at 10:16 PM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello, Nathan > >> I've put together some preliminary patches to add frontend support for the sparcv9-* subtarget (ie 64-bit SPARC), modelled on the corresponding x86-64 code - do these look reasonable for inclusion? This doesn't address the codegen side of things yet (isel falls over when trying to actually emit
2004 Jul 21
0
[LLVMdev] GC questions.
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > > Yes, this makes a tremendous amount of sense. Do you think you could > prepare some patches to make this happen? If you have any questions, feel > free to ask :) Ok, a patch[1] is attached. I didn't care to coerce the offset, since I assume that it is an uint, but maybe I should? Hopefully I've understood the llvm source
2009 Mar 11
1
Compiling R-2.8.1 on Sparc Solaris 10: libRlapack.so: symbol __vlog_: referenced symbol not found
Hi, I am compiling R2.8.1 on a Sun M4000 machine with Solaris 10. I am using Sun Studio 12. I get the following error: cc -xtarget=native64 -G -L/usr/sfw/lib/sparcv9 -L/opt/csw/lib/sparcv9 -o grDevices.so chull.o devNull.o devPicTeX.o devPS.o devQuartz.o init.o mkdir ../../../../library/grDevices/libs Warning in solve.default(rgb) : unable to load shared library
2006 Jun 19
0
Hard Solaris 8 compile
We currently have a samba install on Solaris 8 providing a front-end to a Rational ClearCase system. Because of some recent changes, we are having Kerberose issues in validating files (too many open files). After some research, I found that the best way to resolve these is to re-compile samba as a 64bit application to increase the open file restrictions on a Solaris 32 bit app. The problem I am
2011 Feb 09
1
Problem installing MCMCpack on SPARC Solaris 10
Hi list, I tried to install MCMCpack to R-2.12.0, got the following error, CC -m64 -library=stlport4 -I/apps/sparcv9/R-2.12.0/lib/R/include -DSCYTHE_COMPILE_DIRECT -DSCYTHE_DEBUG=0 -DHAVE_TRUNC -DHAVE_IEEEFP_H -I/opt/csw/include -KPIC -g -c MCMCSVDreg.cc -o MCMCSVDreg.o "error.h", line 598: Error: The function "abort" must have a prototype.
2005 Jun 30
3
[LLVMdev] X86AsmPrinter + MASM and NASM backends
Some wheird problem, Target/X86 builds okay now. But there seems to be another problem with the Cygwin build :- make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/build/llvm/lib/Target/SparcV9/ModuloScheduling' llvm[4]: Compiling ModuloSchedulingSuperBlock.cpp for Debug build /usr/src/llvm/lib/Target/SparcV9/ModuloScheduling/ModuloSchedulingSuperBlock.cpp : In member function `virtual bool
2006 Oct 31
0
6310483 boot needs some more help for gcc on SPARC
Author: eota Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 50021b84343742e322d24ce75d5cf4b26369fd38 Log message: 6310483 boot needs some more help for gcc on SPARC Files: create: usr/src/psm/stand/boot/sparc/common/util.h update: usr/src/psm/promif/ieee1275/common/prom_node.c update: usr/src/psm/promif/ieee1275/common/prom_test.c update: usr/src/psm/stand/boot/common/readfile.c update:
2004 Oct 01
0
samba compilation error message
I try to compile samba 3.0.7 with parameters "--with-ldap" and "--with-ldapsam" and got a messages: *************** checking for LDAP support... yes checking ldap.h usability... no checking ldap.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: ldap.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: ldap.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: ldap.h: proceeding
2010 Feb 04
0
[LLVMdev] [patch] SPARCV9 subtarget support
Hello, Nathan >   I may need to clarify, sparcv9-* is used for the SPARCV9 ABI (ie 64-bit ABI), rather than the SPARCV9 CPU per se. It serves the same purpose as x86_64-* and powerpc64-*, which is to say it's associated with -m64, not -mcpu=v9 (although unsurprisingly -m64 does require a V9 or later CPU). I may be wrong, but I think the only distinction in ARM is between arm and thumb
2005 Sep 27
2
Invalid address error message
Hi, I ran a d-program with syscall::open:entry probe but got the following error messages sometimes: dtrace: error on enabled probe ID 1 (ID 14: syscall::open:entry): invalid address (0xff34e000) in predicate at DIF offset 76 dtrace: error on enabled probe ID 6 (ID 14: syscall::open:entry): invalid address (0xff34e000) in predicate at DIF offset 28 I don''t know how to interpret these
2005 Jul 28
1
[LLVMdev] about Sparcv9 assembly code
Hi: When I tried to use llc -march=sparcv9 to compile some llvm .bc to SparcV9, I got such error: llc: /llvm/lib/Target/SparcV9/SparcV9RegInfo.h:62: virtual void llvm::TargetRegClassInfo::markColorsUsed(unsigned int, int, int, std::vector<bool, std::allocator<bool> >&) const: Assertion `UserRegType == RegTypeWanted && "Default method is probably incorrect for
2004 Jul 22
2
[LLVMdev] GC questions.
Ok, here's the new patch. (Please tell me if I shouldn't mail patches directly on the mailing list.) While I was editing LowerGC.cpp I made a little test (not part of this patch, but the diff with LowerGC.cpp in cvs is attached). I've added a new intrinsic called llvm.gcroot_value(sbyte*, sbyte*), which takes a pointer directly instead and transforms it into an alloca. The idea is the
2004 Sep 29
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM build error (sparc gcc 3.2.2)
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:44:50PM -0400, Shukang Zhou wrote: > I met some errors when I tried to build LLVM. The tar file is > llvm-1.3.tar.gz. I am using a sparc machine with gcc 3.2.2. > > ------------- > Compiling SparcV9CodeEmitter.cpp > /uf24/zhou/research/llvm/src/lib/Target/SparcV9/SparcV9CodeEmitter.cpp: In > static member function `static void >
2003 Feb 04
1
Bug in configure script for Solaris v9 arch with libsunperf (PR#2530)
System details: -------------- Sun Blade 1000, Solaris 8, Sun ONE Compiler Suite (rebranded Forte 7), R versions 1.6.0 and 1.6.2 - suspect others are affected, too Problem description: ------------------- Using the recommended env var setting from p.15 of the Admin Guide, the configure script fails the sgemm sunperf test, even though the sunperf libraries are available Not linking with