similar to: vfs_ceph quota support?

Hello everyone, we are running a CTDB cluster and share folders on ocfs2 volumes via samba using the vfs acl_xattr to store acls in extended attributes. It works fine with Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. I'm currently testing 18.04 and have a weird (but reproducable) ACL behaviour: I grant two users a and user b full access on a folder from a windows client. (Share permissions are fullcontrol for

Good Morning, Using Linux Mint 19.1 I have configured UFW to allow Samba. I see that ports 135 tcp, 137 udp, 138 udp , 139 tcp and 445 tcp are all set properly. The problem is that with UFW enabled I cannot connect to my Windows 8.1 PC. Error "Unable to mount location - failed to retrieve list from server, file or directory does not exist". With UFW disabled I can connect and browse

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:19:50AM +0200, David Disseldorp via samba wrote: > Hi Felix, > > On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 16:30:17 +0200, Felix Stolte via samba wrote: > > > is the vfs_ceph supporting quota set on a directory inside cephfs? > > Not at this stage. CephFS uses a non-standard (xattr) interface for > quotas, which is not currently supported by Samba.

Is there a recommendation for good books covering the setup/deployment of Samba 4 using an Active Directory structure? Something on the order of "The Official Samba-3 HOWTO and Reference Guide"? I've setup a Samba4 server and I've gotten a Win10 machine to join the domain, but i can't seem to move past that to get a user to login or to create a share. Sort of blindly

Hello, today i upgrade my printserver from samba 4.8.6 to 4.9.2 (ubuntu 18.04). First, all is working correctly. But whe im typing "testparm" now the following warnings are shown: ############## Loaded services file OK. Warning: Service printers defines a print command, but parameter is ignored when using CUPS libraries. Warning: Service print$ defines a print command, but

Hi everyone, we are using custom dfree commands to implement quotas. While these work fine on normal shares, the "dfree command" parameter seems to be ignored in the homes section. Is this correct (and intended)? Best regards Felix IT-Services Telefon 02461 61-9243 E-Mail: f.stolte at fz-juelich.de -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Felix, On 4/18/24 08:33, Stolte, Felix via samba wrote: > Is this a bug or maybe a misconfiguration? In the latter, which parameters could cause this? I guess the nodes end up using different combinations of dev/inode as primary key for the locking.tdb record. Probably because the device numbers differ on the nodes and you didn't fix this known issue with GPFS with the fileid VFS

Hi, I'm testing out ceph_vms vs a cephfs mount with a cifs export. I currently have 3 active ceph mds servers to maximise throughput and when I have configured a cephfs mount with a cifs export, I'm getting a reasonable benchmark results. However, when I tried some benchmarking with the ceph_vms module, I only got a 3rd of the comparable write throughput. I'm just wondering if

Hello List, as anyone tried to install samba with/ontop on a ceph cluster? Regards, Dirk

On 2016-01-08 at 09:31 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 04:26:24PM +0100, Dirk Laurenz wrote: > > Hello List, > > > > as anyone tried to install samba with/ontop on a ceph cluster? > > Try compiling and setting up with vfs_ceph. Correct, that's basically it. > Needs some more work, but should work. Some posix features are not quite there

hi jeremy / all, On 11/6/19 10:39 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: > This is re-exporting via ceph whilst creating 1000 files, > yes ? What timings do you get when doing this via Samba > onto a local ext4/xfs/btrfs/zfs filesystem ? yes, creating 10k small files. doing the same on a local ssd, formatted with an ext4 fs without any special options: root at plattentest:/mnt-ssd/os# time for s in

Hi Michael, I am wondering about the meaning of the cmake flags LLVM_ENABLE_LIBCXX and > LLVM_ENABLE_LIBCXXABI. Are they used to indicate that if the C/C++ compiler > for building LLVM is clang, and if this clang has support for libc++ with > libc++Abi, that both lib++ and libc++abi should be used (instead of linking > to the default, which at least on Linux is libstdc++)? Yes that

Greetings all! I am in the process of deploying a POC around SAMBA and CEPH. I'm having some trouble locating concise instructions on how to get them to work together (without having to mount CEPH to the computer first and then exporting that mount via SAMBA). Right now, my stopper is trying to locate ceph.so for x64 CentOS 6.5. [2014/02/26 15:05:23.923617, 0]

Hi Jack, Ross & all... We have been working with V-Trails in refining their solution for Mp3 streaming and will be bearing the fruits of this labor starting this weekend publicly with 5 different "Audiorealm Network" stations for first initial public testing - after final testing we look to release this solution NETWORK wide - making the Audiorealm.com Network effectively the first

Also please note that there is a description of each option in the CMakeLists.txt :) llvm/trunk/CMakeLists.txt option(LLVM_ENABLE_MODULES "Compile with C++ modules enabled." OFF) option(LLVM_ENABLE_CXX1Y "Compile with C++1y enabled." OFF) option(LLVM_ENABLE_LIBCXX "Use libc++ if available." OFF) option(LLVM_ENABLE_LIBCXXABI "Use libc++abi when using

Hi folks, we are running a clustered Samba Fileserver using CTDB with two public IPs. We observed the following (mis) behavior: If user A with write permissions opens an excel file via public ip A and User B opens the same file via public ip B, both users get a Deny-Write lock on the same file and overwrite each others changes: 0:3693691 145522 DENY_WRITE 0x12019f RDWR

> Given my experience of running multiple streams on an > old 486, I'd say you will run out of bandwidth before you > overpower the server. Bandwidth is indeed the biggest resources. We used dual CPU p3-600's at icast. We had 4 machines and we built it to easily handle 12,000 listeners over 500 streams. Only 3 were active at any one time ( the 4th was failover ). CPU load

Hi, I am wondering about the meaning of the cmake flags LLVM_ENABLE_LIBCXX and LLVM_ENABLE_LIBCXXABI. Are they used to indicate that if the C/C++ compiler for building LLVM is clang, and if this clang has support for libc++ with libc++Abi, that both lib++ and libc++abi should be used (instead of linking to the default, which at least on Linux is libstdc++)? If not, what is the canonical way of

Hi All I have a newly implemented two node CTDB cluster running on CentOS 7, Samba 4.7.1 The node network is a direct 1Gb link Storage is Cephfs ctdb status is OK It seems to be running well so far but I'm frequently seeing the following in my log.smbd: [2018/09/18 19:16:15.897742, 0] > ../source3/lib/dbwrap/dbwrap_ctdb.c:1207(fetch_locked_internal) > db_ctdb_fetch_locked for

Hi list, we have migrated a single node Samba server from Ubuntu Trusty to a 3-node CTDB Cluster on Debian Bullseye with Sernet packages. Storage is CephFS. We are running Samba in Standalone Mode with LDAP Backend. Samba Version: sernet-samba 99:4.18.2-2debian11 I don't know if it is relevant here's how we have mounted CephFS on the samba nodes: (fstab):/samba /srv/samba ceph