similar to: Linux multiple member server

Good to hear I was correct about all members having same ranges. Now, I have had this idmap sequence order for years in my smb.conf files and have copy pasted always moving forward. Sorry if I am misunderstanding you but, your saying invert them, listing the SAMDOM first followed by the "*"? like this example? idmap config SAMDOM : backend = rid idmap config SAMDOM : range =

Rowland, Sorry, now I am really confused . . . I thought users were suppose to maintain the same ranges on all the member servers? My ranges came from the v4.1 days when I was running Sernet version (before they moved to a pay for model.) I trying to join a linux workstation to my domain (if that makes a difference.) On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at

Hi! For the files that are in the share Regards; On 18-07-2018 18:09, Micha Ballmann wrote: > You mean your Samba shares? For fure. > > Regards > > Am 18. Juli 2018 22:54:28 MESZ schrieb Carlos via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org>: > > Hi! > > I would like to know if I can use GlusterFS to replicate the files in my > samba domain member?

Hi! I would like to know if I can use GlusterFS to replicate the files in my samba domain member? Regards;

On 30/01/15 19:14, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > There is no uidNumber or gidNumber specifically listed (there is an > objectGuid and an objectSid.) > > Did nothing. > > Now? > > --- > > ------------------------- > > Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy > > 615.885.2846 (main) > www.donelsontrophy.com [1] > > "Everyone deserves an

Okay, so I did this to myself. I overlooked an important sentence on the "https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_%26_Windows_Profiles". The sentence that instructs to do "Profile share using Windows ACLs" ***OR*** "Profile share with using POSIX ACLs". So, I have reset the permissions to how they were before I messed them up doing the "POSIX ACLs" part.

Yesterday I was "tailing" a log file (nmbd, I think) and noticed complaints by my member server that there was another "domain master" at the ipaddress on my DC1. This morning Windows clients are being denied updates to "116.168.192.in-addr-arps/IN" (which I believe is the reverse zone.) I think I have an error in my smb.conf file for this server as I have had an

On my test system I can only get 'getent -V' to respond. Member server smb.conf file: root at mbr01:~# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf [global] workgroup = TEST security = ADS realm = TEST.BOB netbios name = mbr01 domain master = no host msdfs = no dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab kerberos method = secrets and keytab client signing = if_required ## map id's outside to

On 2016-11-14 08:39, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Is this on a windows 7 or 10 client or both? > Are you useing \\FQ.DN\share or \\hostname\share > Try the FQ.DN, as Microsoft advices. > > And where are the TLS parameters in the below config. > Did you set this up? > > Greetz, > > Louis > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van:

I have a member server running Ubuntu 16.10, Samba 4.4.5 that is serving files to W10 and W7 clients. Things appear fine and suddenly the server share disappears and the W clients "cannot see" the server. The client error message is: "The device or resource (member hostname) is nt setup to accept is not setup to accept connections on port "The file and print sharing

Hi All I have a newly implemented two node CTDB cluster running on CentOS 7, Samba 4.7.1 The node network is a direct 1Gb link Storage is Cephfs ctdb status is OK It seems to be running well so far but I'm frequently seeing the following in my log.smbd: [2018/09/18 19:16:15.897742, 0] > ../source3/lib/dbwrap/dbwrap_ctdb.c:1207(fetch_locked_internal) > db_ctdb_fetch_locked for

On Fri, 18 May 2018 14:44:09 +0200 Micha Ballmann via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Is it possible to Mix Samba 4.8.2 with Samba 4.7.7? Yes > > I have three domain controller (up to 10000 users) running on Samba > 4.7.7. > > I want to kill all samba processes of Dc1 and do all necessary steps > for an upgrade to version 4.8.2. Dc2 and Dc2 still running

On Fri, 18 May 2018 15:24:50 +0200 Micha Ballmann <ballmann at uni-landau.de> wrote: > Thx, > > all samba server were compiled from source. > In which case, download the Samba tarball and unpack it, cd into the directory created by the unpacking, check if you require any extra packages and install them. Run configure with exactly the same options as you did previously. If

I compiled an older version of Samba, 4.5.9, in CentOS7 using the guide, however, I am unable to start the service. Samba also does not appear in the “systemctl” list, nor does it appear in init.d after successful compilation and installation with no errors. The “smbd -b” commands reports that Samba is installed.

On 30/01/15 18:28, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > After restoring the member server and re-running the improved > "4-setup-samba4-MEMBER-wheezy.sh" script I am still having the same > issue. W7 client still not allowed to access the member server. > > Administrator still has a uidNumber: > > getent passwd Administrator >

I have been improving my DC. I now have a DC01, DC02 and a DCMEMBER01. All running sernet-samba 4.1.16 on Debian 7.8.0 thanks to Louis' (old) scripts. (Any linux client work has gone on hold, for the moment.) Next step was to adjust the file permissions as instructed on "Setup and configure file shares with Windows ACLs". When I access the "Computer Management" (thru ADUC

Can someone please clarify the scope of the remarks in this wiki page: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/RFC2307_backend specifically, can you confirm that the following applies only to a Member Server, (not the DC)? https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/RFC2307_backend#Configuring_RFC2307_backend_for_Winbind > Configuring RFC2307 backend for Winbind > > Add the following to the [global]

As was used to (in Samba NT/LDAP), i've enabled quota on /homes, and homes are exported (as homedrive) for users. Editing quotas (with edquota) works as expected, and in windows explorer users get quota correctly reported, but a simple: repquota -a return nothing: root at vdmsv1:~# repquota -a *** Report for user quotas on device /dev/sdb1 Block grace time: 28days; Inode grace time:

Hai, > I have an issue that "getent passwd SAMDOM\usrname" returns a blank response. And > Running "getent passwd" returns all the local users. Both results "are" correct. But have you tried this : getent passwd "SAMDOM\username" And does id username still work ;-) Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba

On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 15:31:06 -0500 Robert Wooden via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Good to hear I was correct about all members having same ranges. > > Now, I have had this idmap sequence order for years in my smb.conf > files and have copy pasted always moving forward. > > Sorry if I am misunderstanding you but, your saying invert them, > listing the